While running 9.04 and 9.10 (I have tried both) the kcryptd process uses just
one core on an atom 330.
I'm seeing about 18-19MB/s throughput.
I doubt this is a bug, and instead I suspect that it needs to be
submitted as a feature request. Clearly, encryption will be used more
and more often, and
Still broken in 8.04 LTS
Would the fix be backported from 9.04 IF it is working?
--
Nautilus does not notify about permissions errors over samba shares
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Bob Slydell: What would you say ya do here?
Sebastien Bacher : Well look, I already told you! I deal with the goddamn
customers so the engineers don't have to! I have people skills! I am good at
dealing with people! Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you
people?
I guess what
Also, a correction for step 3:
Reduce the permissions of the folder
chmod 0700 foldername/
--
Nautilus does not notify about permissions errors over samba shares
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Step 4 above is wrong, that process works fine for me.
I've just done some further testing, and a requirement to reproduce this
is that the share must be mounted as a cifs filesystem. ie: mount -t
cifs //servername/sharename
--
Nautilus does not notify about permissions errors over samba shares
Public bug reported:
Distro:Hardy
Regression from Gutsy
Issue: When browsing to samba shares that the user does not have correct
permissions to view, no error is displayed. Instead, the user is
presented with an apparently empty folder.
Expected: Nautilus should notify the user that they do not
