[Bug 654981] Re: SRU empathy to 2.32.0.1 in maverick

2010-10-13 Thread Sulumar
I dont See the behaviour Martin described with the -proposed empathy, it seems to work fine for that But i cant içnvite ppl to join a conversation with the -proposed empathy. 1TO1 works fine. conference dont -- SRU empathy to 2.32.0.1 in maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654981 You recei

[Bug 657865] Re: josm-plugins cannot be installed with maverick version

2010-10-13 Thread Sulumar
With -proposed enabled josm pulls josm-plugins and both install without problems ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- josm-plugins cannot be installed with maverick version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657865 You received this bug notification because you a

Re: [Bug 650880] Re: Update Manager did not start

2010-10-08 Thread Sulumar
On 08/10/10 16:16, Michael Vogt wrote: > Thanks for your bugreport. > > What message was displayed when it did not start? > > ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete > > Nothing at all when i start it normally it works -- Update Manager did not start https://b

[Bug 652780] Re: During Testcase firefox wont start

2010-10-01 Thread Sulumar
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652780/+attachment/1661847/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652780/+attachment/1661848/+files/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profile_defa

[Bug 652780] [NEW] During Testcase firefox wont start

2010-10-01 Thread Sulumar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch) Release:10.10 firefox: Installé : 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 Candidat : 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 Table de version : *** 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0 50

[Bug 650880] Re: Update Manager did not start

2010-09-29 Thread Sulumar
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650880/+attachment/1652204/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Update Manager did not start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650880 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 650880] [NEW] Update Manager did not start

2010-09-29 Thread Sulumar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager During system test Update manager did not start ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: update-manager 1:0.142.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 Architecture: i3

[Bug 649736] Re: Suspend did not function

2010-09-28 Thread Sulumar
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649736/+attachment/1648229/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Suspend did not function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 649736] [NEW] Suspend did not function

2010-09-28 Thread Sulumar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pm-utils the tastcase about suspend fails on Maverick In the test cas the system does not suspend ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: pm-utils 1.4.1-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-gen

[Bug 649709] Re: No flash video image

2010-09-28 Thread Sulumar
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649709/+attachment/1648085/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649709/+attachment/1648086/+files/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profile_defa

[Bug 649709] [NEW] No flash video image

2010-09-28 Thread Sulumar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox During Testcase i could not see the video on Maverick Beta ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: firefox 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i6