I've noticed the same thing… both on Ubuntu, and lately on Gentoo as
well, so I'm thinking maybe something in udev / kernel has changed?
I use FVWM2 as my desktop on both OSes. My desktop runs Ubuntu 20.04
(AMD64).
On my laptop (Panasonic CF-53, which runs Gentoo) it's particularly
insidious, pl
Right, so the situation is this: bit rot.
mplayer is no longer maintained apparently, the suggested alternative
being `mpv`, which *can* be used with `xscreensaver` (see Debian
bug#958865 link).
Guess we can close this now, time to migrate over to `mpv`.
--
You received this bug notification be
So this issue has been known of in Debian for a while now. I reported the
issue today there:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958865
but there was this earlier report from nearly a year ago:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920485
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug
Reproduced the same crash on Debian 10.
** Also affects: mplayer (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857407
Title:
mplayer broken The
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I'm using 'mplayer' alongside 'xscreensaver' to play a few videos as
screen savers. To save space, I've dropped the frame size of the videos
(and they play without sound).
On some videos, which I have converted from other media (the example I
will give here is a truncat
I hit the same bug on Gentoo with glibc-2.29-r2 and alsa-lib-1.1.8.
Looking at the code, I see they do something similar to the suggestion
made in https://stackoverflow.com/a/32672476.
It would appear this kludge no longer works. Down later the suggestion
was to tweak the -std=XXX flag passed to
C source (and headers), and are installed *together* so there
shouldn't be a need to introduce this fragile complexity of having
architecture-dependent C compiler include paths.
It certainly was this way on Gentoo/MIPS where we had to contend with
not two, but three ABIs (o32, n32 and n6
Okay, well firstly, we're not planning on moving up to 18.04 LTS for a
while… so everything here is as per the Ubuntu 16.04 LTS distribution.
> - the current libperl in 18.04 should be libperl5.26:amd64 - could you
upgrade that and all other packges and retry?
root@bnesecrf0:~# apt-cache search l
Public bug reported:
This could be a bug in the underlying toolchain or Perl libraries.
The host in question has been updated from Ubuntu 12.04 LTS → 14.04 LTS
→ 16.04 LTS.
root@bnesecrf0:~# sa-compile
Feb 15 08:52:01.090 [1364] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can
take a while...
On 29/04/14 18:35, Stefan Bader wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On 29.04.2014 05:23, Stuart Longland wrote:
>> Did the linux-3.13.0-24-generic package miss out a few files or are they
>> in a separate package the installer forgot to install?
>
> That could be and depends on y
As a point of interest, this is an `rbdmount` script I use with upstart
as a work-around to the mountall issue.
It assumes that the devices listed in /etc/ceph/rbdmap are intended to
be mounted locally, and so calls mount on each listed device that
appears.
Very much a hack: it'd be more elegant
t; /lib/modules/3.13.0-24-generic/kernel/crypto/cast_common.ko
> /lib/modules/3.13.0-24-generic/kernel/crypto/wp512.ko
> /lib/modules/3.13.0-24-generic/kernel/crypto/crc32.ko
> /lib/modules/3.13.0-24-generic/kernel/crypto/deflate.ko
> /lib/modules/
the device it needed would appear in time.
I can understand the "let's wait it out and see if it appears", but not
the "let's halt everything until the device magically appears". The
latter is dangerous for any system for which local console access is
difficult or un
Public bug reported:
Hi,
This is a fresh install of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS AMD64. I tried configuring
a Ceph Rados Block Device (rbd) to be mounted during boot on
/var/lib/one, containing my OpenNebula configuration and database.
The idea being that should the machine go belly up, I'll have an up-to-
you should see the attachments now. Due to being
the reporter of the problem I am unable to mark the bug as "confirmed".
Regards,
--
Stuart Longland
Systems Engineer
_ ___
\ /|_) | T: +61 7 3535 9619
\/ | \ | 38b Douglas StreetF: +61 7 3535 9699
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099047/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099049/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099050/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
--
You received this
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099046/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099048/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497
Title:
US
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099045/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099044/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099042/+files/Lsusb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497
Title:
USB
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099041/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497
Title:
USB
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Hi,
I just did a fresh install of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS onto a machine here.
During the installation (which is pre-seeded) and in the BIOS, my
keyboard works flawlessly.
However, the moment I boot the machine u
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099040/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497
apport information
** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313497/+attachment/4099043/+files/PciMultimedia.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13134
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I just did a fresh install of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS onto a machine here.
During the installation (which is pre-seeded) and in the BIOS, my
keyboard works flawlessly.
However, the moment I boot the machine up, I note the keyboard is not
operational. Naturally, I discover this
For the record, my initial report of problems was here:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-March/179844.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289318
Title:
Samba dumps core if
Actually, rather than commenting out stanzas, one should just fix the
directives to use the correct statement in the sogo.conf:
Require all granted
# Explicitly allow caching of static content to avoid browser specific
behavior.
# A resource's URL MUST change in order to have the cl
Just discovered this "gem" trying to mount a Ceph RBD device on boot.
To add insult to injury, this is on a normally headless server, which is
in a difficult spot to get a keyboard and monitor to.
A server that requires me to be physically present to press a S key (and
also as a side-effect, *does
That seems to have fixed it at long last. We've got a rather
complicated boot menu system so out of those netboot tarballs, I just
grab initrd.gz and linux files, and place them in a common directory
tree so we can deploy various i686 and AMD64 distributions by picking
them from a menu.
The broke
Hi, Apologies for the delay. I've been on other projects and only just
got back to this one.
We're using the files from
http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/pub/ubuntu/archive/dists/precise-
proposed/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz
I'm downloading the latest copy of that now,
Silly question, has this fix made it into the current netboot images for
Ubuntu 12.04 on AMD64 and i686?
I just downloaded the latest netboot images, even tried the ones in the
-proposed directory, and I'm still getting a long pause from my netboot
images.
--
You received this bug notification b
I've got the following in my preseed file:
d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/sdc
d-i grub-installer/only_debian boolean false
d-i grub-installer/bootdev string /dev/sdc
We've got two machines intended as Ceph OSD nodes, they've got two 3TB
HDDs on the two high-speed SATA ports and a 60GB SSD on
Well, I've been battling this for the past 8 hours.
I'm trying to configure some virtual machines. My intention is to
provision some real machines for use in an Ceph/OpenStack cluster.
Since it'll probably take a few attempts, I want to automate as much as
possible.
As a test, I am doing the dep
Hi,
Is there any possibility of this patch being reviewed and included in
the Ubuntu 10.04 series? We just had the customer at this site ring up
complaining that they couldn't log in today. Turns out something
reverted our patched gdm package back to the original Ubuntu one.
Think: big industri
Fair enough, I think I found some related files on the HP site, been
reading through those.
What I don't understand is this: why is it suddenly a firmware issue now
on Ubuntu 12.04, when it wasn't an issue on VMWare ESX? The hardware
has not changed. If there's a firmware bug, fine, but why was
Just re-loaded, lspci reports the affected controller as being the
following:
07:01.0 RAID bus controller: Compaq Computer Corporation Smart Array 64xx (rev
01)
Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Smart Array 642
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 18
Not sure what the official status is, but I'm getting this problem with
a HP ProLiant box here running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and linux-
image-3.5.0-25-generic as well as the 3.2-series kernels.
For me the machine will run fine for about a day, then everything locks
up. If I'm lucky, I can SSH in, but
I've noticed this myself.
For what it's worth, a lot of people here are experiencing it with
Windows VMs. I tried booting a Zentyal system with a qxl emulated card
and got the same result.
root@bneprdcn0:/var/lib/libvirt/images# dpkg -l qemu-kvm*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Statu
Okay, I can confirm this would appear to fix the problem.
Test procedure:
1. Log in remotely to the affected machine using ssh, run the following
command:
$ sudo watch ls -l /proc/$( pidof gdm-binary )/fd
2. Start a remote X session with that host (through Xnest, plain X,
whatever)... observ
** Patch added: "The aforementioned patch for gdm"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053217/+attachment/3324446/+files/gdm-2.30.2.is.2.30.0-filehandle-fix.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Public bug reported:
At a client's site (a large mining company here in Queensland) we have a
Ubuntu 10.04 virtual machine running MacroView SCADA in a dr:bd high
availability cluster. Workstations connect to the server via XDMCP for
control of the local plant.
In the past they ran two discrete
Hate to bump an old bug... but it seems silly to create another one for
essentially the same issue.
I am currently packaging a proprietary application as an Ubuntu package
(the MacroView SCADA system, as it so happens). Host platform is Ubuntu
10.04 LTS i386.
In previous releases, the upstream s
45 matches
Mail list logo
