[Bug 1969786] Re: Upgrade from 20.04 to 22.04 failed: AttributeError: 'DistUpgradeController' object has no attribute 'tasks'

2025-06-06 Thread Ryo Onodera
Also, `debootstrap`-ing `focal` and installing `nsight-systems:amd64` didn't trigger the bug, correctly marking the package as `MarkDelete`. ``` MarkInstall libc6:amd64 < 2.31-0ubuntu9.18 -> 2.35-0ubuntu3.10 @ii umU Ib > FU=1 MarkInstall locales:amd64 < 2.31-0ubuntu9.18 -> 2.35-0ubuntu3.10

[Bug 1969786] Re: Upgrade from 20.04 to 22.04 failed: AttributeError: 'DistUpgradeController' object has no attribute 'tasks'

2025-06-06 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi, I'm affected by this bug as well. To large extent, I've tracked down the real issue. It looks like the culprit is the existence of `nsight-systems:amd64` on affected systems before the 20.04 => 22.04 upgrade. That package causes cascades of package removals (including the pivotal `ubuntu-desk

[Bug 554009] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2016-12-25 Thread Ryo Onodera
As this bug was closed with "fix-released", I'm re-opening as another bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs- tools/+bug/1644975 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2016-12-25 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi! Some time passed... Will this bug be addressed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644975 Title: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: htt

[Bug 1644975] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2016-12-07 Thread Ryo Onodera
I'm marking this status to confirmed because this is a re-open of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/554009 ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1522563] Re: hangs on packages libfm4 and libfm-extra4

2016-11-26 Thread Ryo Onodera
Thanks for fixing this!!! So, when is this released to xenial?? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522563 Title: hangs on packages libfm4 and libfm-extra4 To manage notifications about

[Bug 1644975] [NEW] Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2016-11-26 Thread Ryo Onodera
Public bug reported: Well, hibernation with swap file doesn't work while hibernation with swap partition works perfectly fine with the exactly same configuration and hardware. The reason is that when resuming from swap file, initramfs script can't correctly detect the machine are hibernated from

[Bug 554009] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2016-10-26 Thread Ryo Onodera
Oops, I pasted wrong URL for the patch... This is the URL I intended to quote: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs- tools/+bug/554009/+attachment/1366060/+files/resume.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 554009] Re: Resume from disk (swapfile) fails

2016-10-26 Thread Ryo Onodera
Well, my setup needed this patch (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs- tools/+bug/554009/+attachment/1368963/+files/probe.c) for the hibernate to work. And it isn't applied to the package. I'd like to help this is really fixed. In short, my setup is swapfile inside the system file

[Bug 1522563] Re: hangs on packages libfm4 and libfm-extra4

2016-10-25 Thread Ryo Onodera
I've encountered with similar problem for the package libfuse2. After some investigation, it seems that this is caused by an infinite loop inside resolve_path. After this tiny hack, it finished to work: ``` ryoqun@miyako:~$ diff -u /usr/bin/debsums{?*,} --- /usr/bin/debsums.backup 2016-10-26

[Bug 1633865] [NEW] zfs-doc is needlessly depended by zfsutils-linux

2016-10-16 Thread Ryo Onodera
Public bug reported: Not minor bug. However as far as I'm aware, usually *-doc packages aren't depended by really actual packages. They should be optional for disk space savings. However the zfs package doesn't follow the convention as follows: ryoqun@miyako:~$ aptitude show zfsutils-linux Packa

[Bug 1083038] Re: Encrypted LVM in Ubiquity unavailable when installing alongside an existing OS

2016-09-02 Thread Ryo Onodera
Maybe related to this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1514120 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1083038 Title: Encrypted LVM in Ubiquity unavailable when install

[Bug 1514120] Re: Encrypted Ubuntu on dual boot

2016-09-02 Thread Ryo Onodera
This should be really fixed... Encrypted ubuntu installation SHOULD be treated equally as plain-text installation. It seems that encrypted installation can be chosen only if the whole system disk is overwritten... I think Ubiquity just can use the free area of the system disk I've prepared for Ub

[Bug 1160352] Re: Still reachable leak is reported with dlopen and pthread

2013-03-26 Thread Ryo Onodera
** Description changed: Valgrind reports still reachable leaks in dlopen()/dlclose() only when linked with -lpthread with the following code: - $ cat /tmp/valgrind-dlopen-pthread-leak.c + $ cat /tmp/valgrind-dlopen-pthread-leak.c #include #include int main() { - char *error =

[Bug 1160352] [NEW] Still reachable leak is reported with dlopen and pthread

2013-03-26 Thread Ryo Onodera
Public bug reported: Valgrind reports still reachable leaks in dlopen()/dlclose() only when linked with -lpthread with the following code: $ cat /tmp/valgrind-dlopen-pthread-leak.c #include #include int main() {   char *error = 0;   void *handle = dlopen(NULL, RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL);   if((

[Bug 1148529] Re: OProfile support is disabled

2013-03-20 Thread Ryo Onodera
Thanks for replying! First of all, Ubuntu started to provide the latest OProfile (0.9.8) again after some inactivity of packaging. I'm really happy about that. Thank you very mcuh!! Because now LLVM depends on libopagent, this bug is blocked by these following libopagent-related bugs: Bug 115402

[Bug 1148682] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libopagent.so: undefined symbol: bfd_init

2013-03-12 Thread Ryo Onodera
As reported at Bug 1154025, my original patch wasn't correct. We need to link statically to libbfd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1148682 Title: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libopag

[Bug 1154025] [NEW] Install PIC version of libbfd.a

2013-03-12 Thread Ryo Onodera
Public bug reported: Like Bug #50512, there should be the PIC version of libbfd.a. The reason is as follows: 1. As required, we need to link statically to libbfd (see linux-tools: perf should link statically to libbfd Bug #783660) 2. we need to build libopagent correctly, which uses libbfd with

[Bug 1148682] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libopagent.so: undefined symbol: bfd_init

2013-03-05 Thread Ryo Onodera
** Description changed: libopagent.so have to be linked to libbfd. I just created a tiny patch for it. However, I'm not sure if this is the right way to fix it.. Please review this. + ldd's change: + + Before: + ryoqun@rrm:~/rubinius/ryoqun$ ldd /usr/lib/libopagent.so -

[Bug 1071683] Re: error while loading shared libraries

2013-03-05 Thread Ryo Onodera
Could you try again after install this package?: apt-get install binutils -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071683 Title: error while loading shared libraries To manage notification

[Bug 1148682] [NEW] symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libopagent.so: undefined symbol: bfd_init

2013-03-05 Thread Ryo Onodera
Public bug reported: libopagent.so have to be linked to libbfd. I just created a tiny patch for it. However, I'm not sure if this is the right way to fix it.. Please review this. ryoqun@rrm:~/rubinius/ryoqun$ ldd /usr/lib/libopagent.so linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff0c39a000) li

[Bug 1148682] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libopagent.so: undefined symbol: bfd_init

2013-03-05 Thread Ryo Onodera
** Patch added: "oprofile-link-libbfd.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oprofile/+bug/1148682/+attachment/3559676/+files/oprofile-link-libbfd.patch ** Attachment removed: "oprofile-link-libbfd.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oprofile/+bug/1148682/+attachment

[Bug 1148529] [NEW] OProfile support is disabled

2013-03-05 Thread Ryo Onodera
Public bug reported: OProfile suppot for LLVM is disabled. It is used for profiling JIT-ed code by LLVM. Please enable OProfile. I created a rough patch for it. Please review. ** Affects: llvm-3.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "llvm-oprofile.patch"

[Bug 1062503] Re: apt fails to install libglapi-mesa-lts-quantal correctly on switching x stacks

2012-11-28 Thread Ryo Onodera
Oops, I forgot one thing to say. Could you confirm these bugs are really fixed now and close them? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062503 Title: apt fails to install libglapi-mesa-lt

[Bug 1062503] Re: apt fails to install libglapi-mesa-lts-quantal correctly on switching x stacks

2012-11-28 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi, for your information, this was affecting following bugs too: Bug #1065722 Bug #1025408 Bug #1025405 Bug #1068555 Bug #1069214 I was separately investigating this issue. The following comments are my report of the investigation (including reproduciable steps): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt

[Bug 1025408] Re: package libjbig0 2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-28 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi, fortunately, this bug is fixed now! I confirmed. This bug is similar to the now-fixed bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1062503 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 1025405] Re: package libtiff5 4.0.2-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libtiff5' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-28 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi, fortunately, this bug is fixed now! I confirmed. This bug is similar to the now-fixed bug: Bug #1062503 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025405 Title: package libtiff5 4.0.2-1ubun

[Bug 1065722] Re: Upgrade to quantal fails: "libqtgui4:i386 depends on libtiff5"

2012-11-28 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi, fortunately, this bug is fixed now! I confirmed. This bug is similar to the now-fixed bug: Bug #1062503 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065722 Title: Upgrade to quantal fails: "l

[Bug 1068555] Re: Quantal upgrade says "no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure"

2012-11-28 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi, fortunately, this bug is fixed now! I confirmed. This bug is similar to the now-fixed bug: Bug #1062503 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068555 Title: Quantal upgrade says "no pac

[Bug 1069214] Re: no package named `libtiff5' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-28 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi, fortunately, this bug is fixed now! I confirmed. This bug is similar to the now-fixed bug: Bug #1062503 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069214 Title: no package named `libtiff5'

[Bug 1068555] Re: Quantal upgrade says "no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure"

2012-11-25 Thread Ryo Onodera
Graeme, this bug can be happened even if Skype isn't installed. Skype depends on i386 library packages and those library packages actually cause this bug. So, if you installed some of those i386 library packages for some other reason, it's possible this bug is happened. -- You received this bug n

[Bug 1025408] Re: package libjbig0 2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-23 Thread Ryo Onodera
Btw, I think it's a good idea for do-release-upgrade to run "apt-get --dry-run" to ckeck there is any problem before hand. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025408 Title: package libjbi

[Bug 1025408] Re: package libjbig0 2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-23 Thread Ryo Onodera
Today, I investigated this problem again. I found another fact: when qdbus:amd64 isn't installed this problem does NOT occur. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025408 Title: package li

[Bug 1068555] Re: Quantal upgrade says "no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure"

2012-11-23 Thread Ryo Onodera
Please take a look into this. I've tracked down that this ALWAYS happens when AMD64 Precise Ubuntu with Skype installed is upgraded to Quantal. I've investigated this problem as much as possible. Please see Bug #1025408 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 1068555] Re: Quantal upgrade says "no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure"

2012-11-22 Thread Ryo Onodera
This is also related to Bug #1065722 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068555 Title: Quantal upgrade says "no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure" To manage notif

[Bug 1065722] Re: Upgrade to quantal fails: "libqtgui4:i386 depends on libtiff5"

2012-11-22 Thread Ryo Onodera
This is related Bug #1025408 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065722 Title: Upgrade to quantal fails: "libqtgui4:i386 depends on libtiff5" To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 1025408] Re: package libjbig0 2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-13 Thread Ryo Onodera
** Attachment added: "failed-libqtgui4-dry-run-upgrade.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jbigkit/+bug/1025408/+attachment/3432063/+files/failed-libqtgui4-dry-run-upgrade.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 1025408] Re: package libjbig0 2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-13 Thread Ryo Onodera
I'm attaching apt-get dry-run results indicating libqtgui4 issue. To be specific, it seems that unpacking libjbig0:amd64 and libtiff5:amd64 is skipped for some reason. Then configuring those packages is started and failed. On the other hand, processing libjbig0:i386 and libtiff5:i386 is fine, it s

[Bug 1025408] Re: package libjbig0 2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-13 Thread Ryo Onodera
OK, I did tested after restoring my backup. Now, I'm fairly certain this upgrade failure is caused by libqtgui4:i386, which is required by Skype. Actually this bug is not caused by Skype itself. Ubuntu pacakaging for Qt 4 has some problem. When libqtgui4:i386 is installed, the upgrade fails. Repr

[Bug 1025408] Re: package libjbig0 2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-12 Thread Ryo Onodera
Tristan Schmelcher (tschmelcher) and WDMARKPC (wdmarkpc), thanks for answering! My guess isn't still cetain, but I came it up from the fact that Skype requires this particular package. Usually it isn't required. My ubuntu was freshly installed recently. And it wasn't contomized a lot and had reall

[Bug 1025408] Re: package libjbig0 2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure

2012-11-09 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hmm, I just looked into this bug. Maybe, this is related to skype.. I want to ask other people affected by this bug. Was skype installed at the time of upgrades? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 1068555] Re: Quantal upgrade says "no package named `libjbig0' is installed, cannot configure"

2012-11-08 Thread Ryo Onodera
Hi, I eccountered this bug... This is related to #1025408 and #1025405 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068555 Title: Quantal upgrade says "no package named `libjbig0' is installed, c