Why has this not made it into precise yet?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995747
Title:
Gedit: Remove trailing spaces feature removes last line.
To manage notifications about this bu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773828
Title:
crash seen after trying to authorize updates
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gksu
The password authentication screen wouldn't come up - said that it
couldn't access the screen. I have desktop effects turned off, yet am
now having difficulty having clicks recognized, especially on the panel
and window decorations. Navigation by ke
I found that simply rebuilding the source package for universalindentgui
included in 9.04 works as well. All that should be necessary to fix it,
then, is to push a changelog-only update to trigger a rebuild: should be
an easy candidate for SRU.
--
Error while loading shared libraries: libqscinti
Public bug reported:
The current version of universalindentgui packaged in Ubuntu Jaunty
32-bit is defective: it installs (including qscintilla dependencies),
but does not run: it cannot find libqscintilla2.so.3, and there is only
libqscintilla2.so.5 available. Creating a symlink does not solve t
Per COPYING.txt in the source, this is LGPL.
--
[needs-packaging] VRJuggler New Deb Package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Yep, double-checked it with Giggle. I noticed it when I uploaded a new
revision of a package to my PPA and had the upload rejected because the
orig.tar.gz was of the same version but contained changes - when I
looked into what it produced, the diff.gz only had the changes I had
made between my las
Please attach the original (corrupted) RTF and any original source
document (abw file, etc) to the upstream bug and reopen it, please.
--
Abiword occasionally corrupts RTF documents
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
oh, and if you've already gotten a goofed-up orig.tar.gz, you need to
git checkout upstream
(fix things and commit)
git tag upstream/upstream-version-with-a-repack-designation
git checkout master
git merge upstream
then do a git-buildpackage (eventually with --git-tag)
--
git-import-dsc incorre
Public bug reported:
If you import a dsc directly to create a new repository, it will put the
/debian dir in the upstream branch (".orig.tar.gz") so you've now broken
the original tarball as well as your ability to upgrade over an existing
source package (orig tarball doesn't match checksums)
Wor
Interestingly, even set up like this workaround, I cannot build a
package that requires one of the packages in the additional mirror.
--
quotes in remaining arguments to pbuilder-dist must be escaped
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398989
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
In order to pass an argument to the underlying pbuilder, for example,
--extramirror, any quotes must be escaped by the user. It seems that
one level of quotes are stripped by pbuilder-dist for the "remaining
arguments" which is less than
I have attached an improved diff which only adds the argument if that
directory exists.
** Attachment added: "pbuilder-dist-aptconfdir.diff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28983184/pbuilder-dist-aptconfdir.diff
--
pbuilder-dist no longer setting aptconfdir
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36304
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
On line 257 on the jaunty current version, there is this line:
return self.auth + ' /usr/sbin/' + self.builder + ' ' + ' '.join(arguments)
which should be
return self.auth + ' ' + os.path.join('/usr/sbin/', self.builder) + ' ' + '
'.joi
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
In the Python code of pbuilder-dist, a number of calls are of the "look
before you leap" form (rather than the pythonic "Easier to ask
forgiveness" idiom) which can lead to race conditions. An example "bad
call" is on line 93:
if not os
Tried to upgrade from Intrepid to Jaunty, this was the only issue (well,
this and the packages dependent on it)
r...@gamma:~$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure lirc
/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: lirc is broken or not fully installed
r...@gamma:~$ sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up lirc (0.8.4a-0ubuntu5) ...
Public bug reported:
The package of DrPython puts the documentation in a non-standard (for
DrPython) location but does not patch the program to look in the right
place. I only looked in the Preferences dialog, but I wouldn't be
surprised if it's like this all over.
The button opens Firefox with
This is fixed in Debian, so all projects taking those packages should
have it fixed. It was never an AbiWord bug.
** Changed in: abiword
Status: New => Fix Released
--
OpenDocument plugin should be shipped with Abiword, not -plugins
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24195
You received this
This was fixed upstream long ago.
** Changed in: abiword
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Crashes when deactivating all plugins
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56694
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
Oh, and it doesn't seem to matter if it's in the preview pane or opened,
neither displays correctly.
--
Non-text attachments are shown inline as if they are text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
** Attachment added: "Screenshot, entire message is unviewable (message sent by
a Barracuda anti-spam server)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21812423/Screenshot-QuarantineSummaries%20%283%20total%29%20-%20Evolution.png
--
Non-text attachments are shown inline as if they are text
https://bug
** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing the problem (attachment at the end of
the message)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21812360/Screenshot-Inbox%20%2845%20unread%2C%20732%20total%29%20-%20Evolution-2.png
--
Non-text attachments are shown inline as if they are text
https://bugs.launchpad
I apparently also have this problem - the mail server is Novell NetMail,
over IMAP, for me. Some emails (that I know are HTML ones) the entire
message shows up as the MIME-encoded text (aka, I can't see any readable
text) whereas others the attachment just shows up like this after the
email. It w
Oh, and it doesn't seem to matter if it's in the preview pane or opened,
neither displays correctly.
--
Evolution fails to display HTML email formatted
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323335
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "screenshot with "3D" corruption (email address obscured)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21812245/Screenshot-Inbox%20%2845%20unread%2C%20732%20total%29%20-%20Evolution-1.png
--
Evolution fails to display HTML email formatted
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323335
You rec
** Attachment added: "Screenshot without the 3D corruption (email address
obscured)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21812219/Screenshot-Inbox%20%2845%20unread%2C%20732%20total%29%20-%20Evolution.png
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21812220/Dependencies
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
When receiving HTML email (from an IMAP server), the preview pane shows
the source code, not the formatted email, about 95% of the time (there
appears to be no pattern: the rare email that shows fine might show
wrong later on, etc. If it matter
I cannot test this as I do not use Intrepid. It would be best if
someone could reproduce this first in Hardy (AMD64 for me, but no way of
knowing if it's arch-dependent) then following the same steps in
Intrepid. This report should then become a backport request.
--
Clicking "add" causes crash
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus-share
Hardy AMD64
0.7.2-0ubuntu5
Reproduce:
Open synaptic.
Right click a folder in Nautilus, and choose Sharing.
Click to share, and click Install when it prompts you to install the sharing
service.
Expected results:
A little installing window
Latest in Hardy.
--
Misspelling in package description: "especifications"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
Public bug reported:
"has non standard
especifications." should be
"has non-standard
specifications."
** Affects: pidgin-sipe (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Misspelling in package description: "especifications"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247459
You received thi
Public bug reported:
In both the Gutsy and Hardy versions, clicking the "Add" button under
Profiles, then entering a name, will cause a crash and segfault.
Starting it again, you'll find that the session was in fact created
(it's in the drop down list.)
** Affects: grsync (Ubuntu)
Importance
I'm not really sure how the (probably alphabetical) positioning of the
file format in the list of possible formats is any reflection of our
compatability. If you think you've found an actual bug, then please
report it separately - however, it seems to be a case of unusual logic.
--
OpenDocument
Please do your work based on the upstream sources if this is truly an
upstream bug (as a quick look suggests it might be) - you'd want to
check for the presence of that directory and create it if it doesn't
exist before showing the dialog. Any patch should be submitted
upstream.
--
~/.Abisuite/A
(save space between arches), I can bring this back.
Just as an item to mention here, for Intrepid I'd like to get rid of all
plugin packages, since it does not help the end user to have them split
and that is the trend with other distributions packaging AbiWord.
However, right now I&
Oops, pasted the wrong URL. It's https://launchpad.net/~abiword-
stable/+archive/
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
Yes, I have updated to the new upstream release (fixing security bugs -
see http://abisource.com/release-notes/2.6.3.phtml ) and have packages
uploaded to the "abiword-stable" team ppa, a better solution than using
my own personal one. https://launchpad.net/~abiryan/+archive/ The
version is 2.6.3
I have it on word from folks in irc on #ubuntu-devel that we're going to
try to get it in 8.04.1 - the first hardy update in 3 months, when the
cd's are re-spun. The current CD's include the old AbiWord.
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug
Good catch on poppler-utils, Michael, didn't realize that poppler was
split. I have had to update the package some more since the previous
package (2.4.6) left out some explicit dependencies to just be pulled in
by other libs which we don't use anymore. I have corrected those errors
- please revi
Scrolling bit has already been mentioned - it's something weird with
Ubuntu only, will take a look later though I fear it's lower in the
stack than Abi and so I have little experience debugging down there.
Fixed the bug issues in the changelog. (formatting and location) I
tried to find the approp
** Attachment added: "diff between 0ubuntu1 and 0ubuntu2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13762989/fixes_to_abi2620ubuntu1.diff
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
OK - I have uploaded the 0ubuntu1 version to my PPA, with a rewritten
summary changelog that goes in one step from the last ubuntu 2.4.6 (as
in, the version in the archive now) right to the 2.6.2-0ubuntu1,
combining all my PPA edits and the more formal discussion of patches
above. I also have note
Ah, great, thanks, didn't get that :) Should I leave in all my
0ubuntu0~ppaXX changelog entries? Also, what's the call on the goffice
plugin? As long as I'm asking questions, should this final package go
on my PPA or should I just post a debdiff against ~ppa20 here to avoid a
non-PPA tagged buil
Apologies for the "ping," but I am posting to let you know that the
ppa20 builds that incorporate all actionable feedback I received are
ready to go. At this point, I'd like to know if there are more material
changes I should be making, or if we are waiting for the availability of
a specific perso
I would imagine so, since both the incoming Ubuntu version and the
Fedora version are fairly true to upstream, and that bug is confirmed in
2.6.2. The filer of that bug (or perhaps you) should take that upstream
(if it's not there already, I think I remember filing that back when I
learned strace)
I just double-checked with Marc Maurer (abi dev) and I can in fact
safely delete the dev files (headers, pc, and .la files for plugins).
ppa20 will feature this change, and will be building soon. Apologies
for the misunderstanding.
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Now replying to Daniel, who posted while I wrote this one:
AbiWord Common: This one is easy - in 2.6 we eliminated the difference
between the gnome and gtk-only builds of AbiWord. The only difference
is now a configure switch for gnomevfs, and given that I have used an
AbiWord "non-gnomevfs" buil
Many of the patches were obsoleted by the improvements to the build system in
2.6, so they didn't apply any more:
01_aaa_fix_plugins_m4 (in the 2.4.6 package but not in 00list!)
01_relibtoolize
02_no_pedantic_configure
09_bad_MANIFEST_omission
The language patches are obsolete due to string updat
That is the same effect I experience, you just described it better. Do
you find this happening in any other applications?
--
Fast scroll wheel issue on Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215845
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Oh, I guess I never actually linked to the MIR I filed.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wv/+bug/215209
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
Let's move the discussion of the scroll issue to those bugs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/215845
In any case it is not a showstopper. Right now I am waiting on the MIR
for wv, as listed and explained above. The package itself is good,
done, tested, and ready for final r
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: abiword
Reproduce:
(Use a 2.6 series package on Hardy)
Scroll up or down very quickly using a scroll wheel or something emulating it.
Observe: The scroll bar moves/up down quickly but returns to the
original position. This does not happen if you scroll
The View, Presentation is a little bug that should be forwarded
upstream, shouldn't be too tough to get a solution and I can easily
backport that patch or what have you.
I'd file the unicode bit too - I'm not sure how likely that is to be
fixed soon, but it's definitely good to know, and I might b
Please review build 2.6.2-0ubuntu0~ppa17 on my PPA for sponsorship and
upload. I see I need a debdiff - I will upload one, but the source
package is also new and there are some binary files that differ (icon,
about dialog image used on Windows at least) so they are omitted. The
debdiff might be u
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: wv
wv was removed from the AbiWord source tarball in 2.6, and so in order
to update AbiWord to 2.6 (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174 ) , we
need wv (really just the libwv-1.2-3 and libwv-dev packages) promoted to
Main.
Ma
I can confirm that bug, Lionel. It is not a packaging bug, I believe,
as no source patches touch related code - please re-file it separately
in Launchpad and upstream. http://bugzilla.abisource.com. (It is
possible it is an Ubuntu-only bug attributable to something in X or
similar, as I'm not exa
It looks like this bug will be "Fix Released" only when 2.6 is uploaded
to Ubuntu: http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174
--
AbiWord-2.4 crashed with SIGSEGV in fp_Page::setView()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150799
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Current (ppa16) packages fix the following bugs registered in Launchpad:
Bug #24195
Bug #56694
Bug #36807
Bug #58662
Bug #3197
Bug #118582
Possibly:
Bug #191194
Bug #150799
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug notification because you are a
This bug will be "Fix Released" only when 2.6 is uploaded to Ubuntu:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174
The plugin will be shipped (and should be working now) in the abiword-plugins
package.
(Note there are newer releases of link-grammar available from AbiSource with
ma
This bug will be "Fix Released" only when 2.6 is uploaded to Ubuntu:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174
(Explicit use of gnomevfs was disabled in my new 2.6 packages to allow
the use of the GVFS FUSE fallback, which has a much cleaner, more
efficient user experience.)
--
Did this ever make it upstream? If/when it does please remember to link
this bug.
--
Abiword segfaults on copy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173695
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
I am guessing that this will probably be fixed when AbiWord 2.6 gets uploaded,
as I have used it successfully. Please test with the packages linked here and
update this bug (and that one) if these packages fix the problem:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174
--
[Hardy]
This bug will be "Fix Released" only when 2.6 is uploaded to Ubuntu:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174 (It was a
strange bug introduced by the previous packaging, and does not appear to
affect AbiWord now that it has been updated to 2.6)
--
Ruler numbers are bold and i
This bug will be "Fix Released" only when 2.6 is uploaded to Ubuntu:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174 (The
abiword, abiword-common, and abiword-gnome packages were merged)
--
should depend on abiword-gnome
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58662
You received this bug no
Note that this is a packaging bug now. It will be fixed by the fix to
bug #202174. (The upstream "bug fix" doesn't really relate to this
bug.)
** Changed in: abiword
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
Bugwatch: AbiSource bug tracker #10953 => None
Status: Fix Released => New
--
Op
This bug will be "Fix Released" only when 2.6 is uploaded to Ubuntu:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174
** Changed in: abiword
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
Bugwatch: AbiSource bug tracker #10014 => None
Status: Fix Released => New
--
Crashes when deac
The PPA has moved here: https://launchpad.net/~abiryan/+archive/ (to
get rid of my messy email and match the nick used everywhere else). The
latest packages should have things working correctly, everything except
Collab. My current task is the MIR for libwv-1.2.
--
Please update to version 2.6
I see now looking at the build logs that I will have to write up another
MIR for libwv-1.2. This is maintained by the AbiWord developers
(specifically Dom Lachowicz, AbiWord maintainer) and is nearly a piece
of abiword itself - it is just a shared library so that folks can use it
if they need Word
ppa12 is building, fixing some small errors that prevented the build
from succeeding. The libasio-dev MIR is in -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asio/+bug/213688
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug notification because you are a
I have updated the report with my comments/additions, and linked this
report from the AbiWord 2.6 Update bug.
--
Main Inclusion Report for asio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213688
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
Getting there - ppa10 should have fixed menu items (with up to date
mimetype lists for the plugins). At this point, with help from #ubuntu-
devel, I'm working on the libasio-dev MIR, and if that doesn't work,
we'll go for #3. Being that it is an easy thing to change, I have also
removed the attem
Steve Langasek steve.langasek-at-canonical.com |AbiWord Bugzilla| wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:39:34PM -0000, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
>
>> Right now an issue is coming up with a compile-time-only dependency on a
>> libasio-dev, which is just a co
OK, well, it looks like I need one more spin of the binary to finish
implementing #2. I'd imagine I'm about 90% of the way there, about 30
minutes-1hr of work left.
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Right now an issue is coming up with a compile-time-only dependency on a
libasio-dev, which is just a collection of header files. Unfortunately, Ubuntu
has this in Universe, and so to stay in Main and enable collaboration support
(which requires this) is a bit complicated. The options are:
1 -
OK, I have a working PPA package up. Left for me to do (hopefully
today) - work on the AbiWord Extras packaging (it should be in the main
binary package, I just need to compile it against an un-installed
package. Should be pretty easy - I have the Fedora spec file that does
the same thing.), spli
The packages should not be separated - the four source packages are
unequivocally one single program. They are packaged together in all
other distributions that AbiWord developers can upload to. The issue is
that I neglected to point abiword-extras to the location of abiword. I
have corrected th
Based on the existing 2.4.6 Ubuntu packages (somewhat) and my first-hand
knowledge of AbiWord development, I have produced new Ubuntu packages of
AbiWord 2.6.0 and now 2.6.2 which fixes some basic issues in the 2.6.0
release and reduces dependencies. I've uploaded them to my PPA -
https://launchpa
2.4.x will have _no_ support going in to the future. Changes to the 2.4
tree stopped being made quite some time ago, due to the large number of
cleanups and improvements to the 2.6.x tree. 2.4.x has been closed for
some time, and AbiWord 2.6 is already in Fedora and SuSE. It would be
very shorts
2.4.6 is exceedingly old - released in November 2006. 2.6.0 contains a
lot of stability improvements, memory/performance improvements,
import/export enhancements, and so on. Including it (with the fixed bug
24195 to support ODF within the abiword package) in Hardy would be a
very important step f
Will we see a backport to Gutsy? Even though it may be a clever image
if you figure it out, it looks unprofessional if you're not anticipating
it.
--
Splash screen typo error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I had the same problem going from Feisty to Gutsy. Andrew Mitchell's
instructions worked for me, and should be included as automatic if at
all possible.
--
No conversion & bad error message with SQLite 2.x database
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64323
You received this bug notification because
Ideally this source would be updated to the latest version released by
AbiSource (auto-toolized and improved) -
http://www.abisource.com/downloads/link-grammar/4.2.4/
--
AbiWord grammar checker does not get installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3197
You received this bug notification because
Fixed upstream in 2.6 branch and trunk - r22162 and r22178 (combined)
** Changed in: abiword
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
Bugwatch: None => AbiSource bug tracker #11240
Status: New => Unknown
--
'Find' followed by 'Replace All' fails to replace the first instance
https://bugs.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: abiword-plugins
(Gutsy, AMD64, recently upgraded)
AbiWord starts normally if started from the Applications menu. However,
if starting because a file was double-clicked on, or if opening a file
from within the application, the contents of the document ar
In order to show the network shares, it must be able to open over the
network (that is, use GnomeVFS). The next version of AbiWord (2.6) will
use LibGSF which allows use of GnomeVFS transparently on systems where
it is available, so when 2.6 is released and packaged, this bug will be
fixed.
--
A
still present in Feisty btw.
--
Ruler numbers are bold and italic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
** Attachment added: "the abw-esq file produced"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7843191/index.html
--
Crash when saving copy as HTML
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubu
The saving as ABW is a separate problem I just figured out - sometimes
the dialog defaults to "ABW" as the file type, rather than
"Automatically Detected". When it is on automatically detected, I do
get the HTML export dialog before the crash.
--
Crash when saving copy as HTML
https://bugs.launc
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: abiword
Here's how I produced this:
In a document, I chose File, Save Copy As.
I clicked on an existing HTML document (to overwrite it/update it with the new
export)
I clicked Save.
Sometimes it will work, sometimes it will crash. Some of the time whe
It happens with this file and another version of the file, at the very
least - I don't do much exporting to HTML to test other files.
** Attachment added: "The file I was working with"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7843186/AbiWord%20Build%20Instructions%202-5-x.abw
--
Crash when saving copy
I seem to be having this problem but there is no package nss-mdns - I
know I had to change the nsswitch.conf to attempt to run Sugar at one
time, what package can I reconfigure to restore default settings?
--
mdns listed in nsswitch.conf causes excessive time for dns lookups
https://bugs.launchp
Public bug reported:
http://www.snc.edu/compserv/handouts/netdrive.pdf is the sample file.
To reproduce (Feisty):
Click and drag starting at the "s" in https:// on the first address shown (for
NetStorage), ending theoretically at the end of the URL.
For me, it never made it to the end without ha
This appears to happen on all printers. Only PNG images are affected -
JPG's insert and print fine.
--
Image prints as black box from AbiWord to LaserJet 6l
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58632
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
The two USB ports for the Zire are normal - you want to use the second,
I think. I no longer have this problem on Edgy.
--
gpilotd runs away with CPU after completing hotsync
https://launchpad.net/bugs/29043
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail
(and I initially reported this and am still using a serial sync dock)
--
gpilotd runs away with CPU after completing hotsync
https://launchpad.net/bugs/29043
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nexuiz
It looks like the version requirements for the Nexuiz package are goofed up -
Update manager could upgrade the data packages, but not the main one, and I get
the following output from a sudo aptitude dist-upgrade:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/apt$ sudo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nexuiz
It looks like the version requirements for the Nexuiz package are goofed up -
Update manager could upgrade the data packages, but not the main one, and I get
the following output from a sudo aptitude dist-upgrade:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/apt$ sudo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tomboy
I had selected and copied two columns in Gnumeric to paste into another
part of the spreadsheet. I then attempted to paste what I formerly had
on the clipboard (not remembering I had copied columns) into Tomboy,
which promptly crashed and asked if
It doesn't seem to matter what I am burning. I believe burning an Iso
works ok, but anything else fails. I also am having trouble burning
with K3b, so I'm not sure where the problem is. I'll see if I can get a
backtrace.
--
nautilus cd burner doesn't work
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79686
--
The office category is where AbiWord itself shows up, as well as
OpenOffice.org, evolution, Gnumeric, etc. This is a packaging error: an
incorrect Desktop file in the help package.
--
AbiWord's help should be in "Office", not "Programming"
https://launchpad.net/bugs/74625
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
