John, I was simply referring to the workaround pointed out by our fellow
testers in comments #8 and #19, which for me is better than nothing
while waiting for Mozilla to fix (although I think this will not so
simple, as it is a result of learning from sites which send wrong mime
types, it's the old
Well, I'm sure this is not an Ubuntu bug, as I explained, so this is
definitely clearly identified, but I have no time nor interest to search
in the Mozilla database for a bug I already solved (sort of). I thought
to be helpful, but if you don't understand it, then keep searching the
solution where
I'm quite sure this is not an Ubuntu bug, but a Firefox one. I have the
same problem on a Mac, and a Windows machine. The workaround (not the
solution, which should come from Mozilla) is the one pointed out in
comments #8 and #19.
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Inv
Yesterday Gnome 2.28.2 (same version of Karmic, and older than Lucid)
was available on Gentoo. I emerged it, and Trash works as expected
there. So, as I supposed, this is not Gnome's fault. I hope now this
should be clear enough: please, fix this on Ubuntu
--
Files and folders deleted on a Sa
As I implied before (mentioning the version change of Gnome), I'm not so
sure it's Gnome's fault, so I wrote it here. If I find something similar
on Gnome bugzilla I'll let you know (as I did 6 months ago). I don't
have an account there, so I can't open a new bug.
--
Files and folders deleted on
Tried today on Lucid (released version) Problem remains.
So, we now have Gnome 2.30, but the behaviour is exactly the same as 6 months
ago. Now there are no time excuses (see #8), it's been 6 full months, and we
have the same extremely annoying bug (I don't agree at all with Imprortance:
low). C
Tried today on Lucid Beta (with a new Gnome version). Problem remains.
--
Files and folders deleted on a Samba network share don't appear at all in Trash
window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457047
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I tried another installation fron scratch (not upgrade) on another
machine, the problem remains the same
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
Files and folders deleted on a Samba network share don't appear at all in Trash
window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Sorry, I didn't understand. So here
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331947 i found something
inherent, they say the bug has already been solved, however this is not
true (at least for me), I deleted the Trash folder on the server, then
tried to delete a file via Nautilus. It recreated th
What information are you lacking? I think the problem has been explained
very well. Please tell me what you need, and I'll try to explain better.
--
Files and folders deleted on a Samba network share don't appear at all in Trash
window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457047
You received this bug
As you like it. Meanwhile I've made some test, and I really think this
issue is not depending on my environment, but on Gnome. If it is, it's
surely a showstopper for Karmic on Desktop PCs in a LAN environment, and
I think people should at least be warned in order to avoid the disaster.
Good luck w
Unfortunately I don't have a Gnome Bugzilla account, so I can't report it.
Anyway, the bug in my opinion is critical, and Ubuntu shouldn't ship with such
a problem. Imagine the new version deployed in a production environment, where
everyone has a remote home on a Samba server with quotas (like
This is not true. Very old version of Gnome (my memories date back to
2003) had a directory on remote shares, then they dropped it, and now
they took it back, but with metadata to allow Nautilus to restore items
to their original place. Try yourself to delete something on a network
share (with Karm
I don't know, I simply upgraded my Pentium 4 (32 bit) from Jaunty (with
all updates) to Karmic, amongst other annoyances this was the worst.
Simply, the trash doesn't show deleted files on my network share on the
Samba server, although the files regularly end up in
/.Trash-/files and associated met
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34093479/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34093480/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34093481/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachm
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
This doesn't seem to happen on other devices (ex. USB keys, though it
didn't ask me to empty the Trash like in previous release). I think this
is a major bug, the risk is filling up network shares without even
knowing it.
ProblemType: Bug
Archit
Yes, I found out myself just a minute ago. I marked this as invalid, is
there a way to remove it at all?
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu53 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456295
You received
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34038901/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34038902/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz"
http://launchpadlibra
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: initramfs-tools
initramfs-tools failed installation on my machine following the upgrade
to Ubuntu 9.10 Beta. It returned an error code of 1.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:01:06 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage:
I reproduced the same bug on a fresh installation of Hardy, without any
other mail software (not event he MTA), just uw-imap. So this bug is
definitely confirmed, and it is not caused by conflicts. Anyway, since
the upgrade to Hardy I had 3 users' inboxes corrupted, I don't know if
this is related,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: uw-imapd
Accessing mail on a uw imap server (with mbox format), and then setting a flag
(including deleting the mail) results in an immediate change of the status flag
on the imap mail folder file. Anyway, this is not true with mbox (the Inbox
mail fil
I've installed the package on Friday the 27th of July , and this seems to have
solved the problem on our server too.
Roberto
--
MASTER [Feisty] cupsd leaking file descriptors (was: Multiple jobs are not
printed)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112803
You received this bug notification because y
Thank you Martin. So, either the problem lies in libdbus-1-3, and this
is the package that should be updated, or cupsys requires dbus, but the
dependency is not present, so a cupsys package update (to include the
dependency) is needed.
Roberto
--
MASTER [Feisty] cupsd leaking file descriptors (w
Hi folks, I'm new around here.
I have the same problem, but I noticed that cupsys doesn't depend on dbus, in
fact I don't even have it installed on my server. So, I'm wondering how a dbus
update can solve the problem. Am I missing something?
Roberto
--
MASTER [Feisty] cupsd leaking file descrip
24 matches
Mail list logo
