After a couple restarts, there are still two tests failing:
autopkgtest for nginx/1.18.0-6ubuntu14.5 for s390x
autopkgtest for postgresql-14/14.15-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 for amd64
Both are due to timeouts in test infra and not related to the change here:
```
4656s DEBUG (session:936) GET call to compute
Hello there,
Can we move 1.4.0-11ubuntu2.5 to jammy-updates now? Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024
Title:
pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories
To manag
Thanks, Andreas, for the quick response. Indeed it makes sense to wait
until after the new year when everyone's back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024
Title:
pam-mkhomedir does
s390 tests has fails on Jammy without this change. See 'migration-
reference/0': https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/at/jammy/s390x
Also fails for a 'hello' package.
So I think this failure can be ignored. Can this be moved to -updates?
Thanks,
Ponnuvel
--
You received this bug notificat
The s390 regression doesn't seem to be related to this change.
https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/s390x/a/at/20241213_232003_396cf@/log.gz
```
692s job 1 at Fri Dec 13 23:21:00 2024
692s + sleep 2
694s OK, at.9321 d
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024
Title:
pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories
To manage no
SRU verification for Jammy.
## Current pam package shows permission 0755 for home dir
root@pon-jammy:~# dpkg -l | grep pam
ii libpam-cap:amd641:2.44-1ubuntu0.22.04.1
amd64POSIX 1003.1e capabilities (PAM module)
ii libpam-modules:amd641.4.0-1
Hi Steve,
I don't disagree that there's an element of risk as noted in the SRU
description and that this is definitely changing the existing behaviour.
But my opinion is that the impacted set of users are going to be few if at all:
- those that create homedirs using pam *and*
- those that rely o
Thanks Alex for reverting!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024
Title:
pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
I have marked the it 'Fix released' for Noble+ and attached for Focal
and Jammy (attached on 2024-11-19).
** Patch added: "focal-debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+attachment/5838904/+files/focal-debdiff.patch
--
You received this bug notification beca
nce: Undecided
Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)
Status: Fix Released
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
** Patch removed: "noble-debdiff.patch"
https:/
Debdiff for Jammy.
** Patch added: "jammy-debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+attachment/5838509/+files/jammy-debdiff.patch
** Patch removed: "jammy-debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+attachment/5837780/+files/
Testing further, the newer versions of pam_mkhomedir module honours
the umask set in /etc/login.defs. So this has already been made consistent
across tools (useradd & so on). So the problem only exists in Jammy & older
Ubuntu releases.
pam_mkhomedir
The relevant part in /etc/login.defs (from Nob
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024
Title:
pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories
To manage n
Debdiff for Noble.
** Patch added: "noble-debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+attachment/5838508/+files/noble-debdiff.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Attaching debdiff for Noble.
** Patch added: "noble-debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+attachment/5837779/+files/noble-debdiff.patch
** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Noble)
Attaching debdiff for Jammy.
** Patch added: "jammy-debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+attachment/5837780/+files/jammy-debdiff.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
** Description changed:
- As reported in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/private-home-directories-
- for-ubuntu-21-04-onwards/19533/13:
+ [Impact]
A common situation is to have a central set of users (e.g. in LDAP) and
use pam_mkhomedir.so to create the home directory when the user first
l
Thanks, Alex!
Do you think this could be backported (SRU'ed) existing releases (Noble,
and Jammy at least) once merged into Plucky or not recommend? It depends
on the risk factor as well as whether you think this is a feature or
bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
@Ubuntu-sponsors, any update on this? I can see Plucky Puffin is now
open for development. So I am hoping we can make some progress on this
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024
T
Now that Oracular is out, I am re-subscribing Ubuntu Sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024
Title:
pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories
To manage notificat
@Vladmir, Thanks for looking into this. I agree this is a change in
behaviour and it's late in the cycle for Oracular. I'll hold this one
off until Oracular is out, and will re-subscribe next month. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Attaching the patch from #2 as a debdiff.
** Patch added: "private_home.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+attachment/5812180/+files/private_home.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Regression potential is high and also not within the SRU requirements:
https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs-
hosted.com/en/latest/explanation/requirements/#minimal-changes-only
Auto repair can still be enabled - just need to be aware that sometimes
there can be false positive "repair" status but
** Description changed:
Due to bug [0], auto_repair, when enabled, doesn't work correctly and
the PGs get stuck in repair state even when there was no scrub repairs
needed/done by Ceph.
It's been fixed from Pacific onwards. Need to be backported to Octopus.
+ Upstream patch: https://
Verfiication has been repeated with 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 from focal-proposed
and has been confirmed to fix the leak (memory usage is stable after
several hours - following the test procedure). Marking verification
done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: veri
** Changed in: ucf (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061825
Title:
[SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy
To manag
1.17-6ubuntu4.6 has superseded the previous version 1.17-6ubuntu4.5 :(
Uploading a new debdiff on top of 1.17-6ubuntu4.6.
** Patch added: "focal-new-patch.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2060666/+attachment/5803755/+files/focal-new-patch.diff
--
You received this
Thanks, Andreas, and Mitchell. All passed now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060666
Title:
[SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
http
1.17-6ubuntu4.5 has been installed from focal-proposed and has been
confirmed to fix the leak (memory usage is stable after several hours -
following the test procedure). Marking verification done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done veri
The proposed patch [0] to fix this has been merged in main.
I have created the backport PRs:
Reef: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58283
Squid: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58285
Quincy: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58284
[0] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/56876
--
You received t
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068743
Title:
Ceph PGs get stuck in repair state
Public bug reported:
Due to bug [0], auto_repair, when enabled, doesn't work correctly and
the PGs get stuck in repair state even when there was no scrub repairs
needed/done by Ceph.
It's been fixed from Pacific onwards. Need to be backported to Octopus.
[0] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5044
** Also affects: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/caracal
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/bobcat
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/yoga
Importance: Undec
Public bug reported:
The missing unit file makes the cephfs-mirror essentially broken.
This is due to the upstream bug: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59682
We would have to SRU this to Squid, Reef, and Quincy.
** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affec
This has been fixed in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/2003704
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028358
Tit
@Robie
1. From man page does allude to that.
" -P foo, --package foo
Don't follow dpkg-divert diversions by package foo when updating
configuration files.
"
which implies ucf should (and does) respect/handle diversions.
2. Further: "ucf should respect dpkg-divert" (refer
ht
Public bug reported:
Currently the "supported Ceph versions" info is available in a few places: [0],
[1], and [2].
But none of them provide a complete information. Even then, it's not
straightforward to work out the EOL dates for a given Ceph version.
Something similar to OpenStack's [2] that c
Attaching the debdiff for Focal.
** Attachment removed: "krb5-focal-debdiff.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2060666/+attachment/5777986/+files/krb5-focal-debdiff.txt
** Attachment added: "krb5-focal-debdiff.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/
Attaching the debdiff for Focal.
** Attachment added: "krb5-focal-debdiff.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2060666/+attachment/5777986/+files/krb5-focal-debdiff.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Description changed:
- Commit 1cd2821 altered the memory
- management of krb5_gss_inquire_cred(), introducing defcred to act as
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ Commit
https://github.com/krb5/krb5/commit/1cd2821c19b2b95e39d5fc2f451a035585a40fa5
+ altered the memory management of krb5_gss_inquire_cred(), intr
@SRU team, is this good to move to jammy from jammy-proposed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009885
Title:
Timeshift 21.09.1-1 broken after Rsync upgrade to
3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2
Can the packages be moved to wallaby/focal-updates pocket now?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057713
Title:
[SRU] ceph 16.2.15
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
Set the locale variables to de_DE.UTF-8.
Then testing timeshift:
ubuntu@bronzor:~$ dpkg -l | grep timeshift
ii timeshift 21.09.1-1
amd64System restore utility
ubuntu@bronzor:~$ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=en_US
LC_CTYPE="en
Thanks, Heitor. I'll remember to run `update-maintainer` going forward!
Re. Focal: The syntax error and relevant code was introduced in 3.0040
whereas Focal is using older ucf. Thus Focal is unaffected. Likewise
Lunar/Mantic/Noble have the fixed version already. So this is a Jammy-
only backport.
Thanks, Dariusz!
I've attached a new debdiff.
** Attachment added: "debdiff_2061825_new.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ucf/+bug/2061825/+attachment/5770060/+files/debdiff_2061825_new.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Attaching the debdiff.
** Attachment added: "debdiff.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ucf/+bug/2061825/+attachment/5767388/+files/debdiff.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Tags added: sts
** Description changed:
- ucf doesn't work correctly when local diversions in place.
+ [ Impact ]
- This is due to a syntax error and has been fixed in Debian upstream:
+ When a dpkg-diversion is used to setup a package diversion and ucf for
managing
+ the configuration fil
** Summary changed:
- ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy
+ [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061825
Title:
[SRU] ucf
al.
This will be a Jammy-only backport.
** Affects: ucf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Fix Released
** Affects: ucf (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: High
Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)
Status: In Progress
** Also affects: ucf (Ubuntu Jammy)
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060666
Title:
Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17
To manage notifications about this
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060666
Title:
Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17
e fix). Bionic doesn't have the commit the introduced the memory leak.
So this fix needs to be backported to Focal (only).
** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan
** Changed in: timeshift (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009885
Title:
Timeshift 21.09.1-1 bro
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
Timeshift is broken after upgrade to 21.09.1-1. This is because of
a change in behaviour by rsync; rsync 3.2.4 changed how the locale's
worked out. From https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/NEWS#3.2.4
"A long-standing bug was preventing rsync from
** Description changed:
- Timeshift version 21.09.1-1 broken after rsync upgrade to
- 3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2. I had to upgrade Timeshift to version 22.11.2
- from Mint PPA to have it working again. Log messages tell rsync failed
- to create backup file. The behavior to note is that in the Timeshif
Mantic and Noble have newer packages of timeshift which contain the
upstream fix [0].
Focal is at 3.1.3-8ubuntu0.7 which predates the rsync change (3.2.4). So
this issue affects just Jammy.
I've created a PPA with this fix for Jammy [1] to test. I'll do an SRU
for Jammy after confirmation.
[0]
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2057713 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057713
Marking as duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057713
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2057713
[SRU] ceph 16.2.15
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
Ceph 16.2.15 has been released.
https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2024/v16-2-15-pacific-released/
This is also the last point release in Pacific and contains several bug fixes.
It also contains the fix for CVE-2023-43040.
** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975906
Title:
[SRU] ceph 16.2.9
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975906
Public bug reported:
A Pacific point release is now available:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/#v16-2-8-pacific
** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Description changed:
- The upstream bug is https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53002
+ [Impact]
- It's been backported to relevant releases upstream (Octopus, Pacific, and
Quincy).
- Octopus 15.2.16 has the fix. So does Quincy 17.2.0. However, the latest
Pacific release missed out this fix. So
** Description changed:
The upstream bug is https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53002
It's been backported to relevant releases upstream (Octopus, Pacific, and
Quincy).
Octopus 15.2.16 has the fix. So does Quincy 17.2.0. However, the latest
Pacific release missed out this fix. So needed to
Attaching debdiff for Pacific (hirsute).
** Attachment added: "debdiff.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1970460/+attachment/5584420/+files/debdiff.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Public bug reported:
The upstream bug is https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53002
It's been backported to relevant releases upstream (Octopus, Pacific, and
Quincy).
Octopus 15.2.16 has the fix. So does Quincy 17.2.0. However, the latest Pacific
release missed out this fix. So needed to be SRU'ed f
** Also affects: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
This has been superseded by
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1964802
which is a newer Octopus release (15.2.16) and contains the commits for fixing
this as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
** Changed in: ntp-charm
Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852441
Title:
In bionic, one of the ceph packages instal
I am not sure if there's anything to fix here for the ntp charm.
The ntp charm shouldn't really be installed in a container.
In general, It should be installed alongside a principal charm
that's on a bare-metal machine.
In situations like charm upgrade, The ntp charm could end up installing
the c
** Also affects: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: cloud-archive
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)
** Changed in: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: cloud-archive
Status: New => In
Attaching debdiff for Focal.
** Patch added: "focal1955345.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1955345/+attachment/5548581/+files/focal1955345.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
backport bug: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53198
This has been already been fixed and available in Pacific.
So needed to backport only for Octopus.
** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (pponnuvel)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu
** Description changed:
- Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng is seems to get stuck in
- a loop and takes up 100% of cpu.
+ Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng seems to get stuck in a
+ loop and takes up 100% of cpu.
root@magicbox:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are a
** Description changed:
Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng is seems to get stuck in
a loop and takes up 100% of cpu.
root@magicbox:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 21.04
Release: 21.04
Codename:
Attached apt-cacher-ng logs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942182
Title:
apt-cache-ng is taking 100% cpu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
** Attachment added: "apt-cacher-ng.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher-ng/+bug/1942182/+attachment/5521847/+files/apt-cacher-ng.zip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Description changed:
Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng is seems to get stuck in
a loop and takes up 100% of cpu.
root@magicbox:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 21.04
Release: 21.04
Codename:
Public bug reported:
Every once in a while, /usr/sbin/apt-cacher-ng is seems to get stuck in
a loop and takes up 100% of cpu.
root@magicbox:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 21.04
Release:21.04
Codename: hirsute
root@magic
** Also affects: cloud-archive/xena
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/wallaby
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/victoria
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri
Importan
** Also affects: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940456
Title:
[SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data e
** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => nikhil kshirsagar (nkshirsagar)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940456
Title:
[SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusi
Reverted the 'status' of the bug to the previous states.
As Dan Streetman pointed out, 'reuse' of this bug causes
confusion and strays from the standard SRU process.
I creates a new bug to carry out the SRU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1940456
The fixed patch is already a
Public bug reported:
This is same as LP#1914584 but its original patch was wrong which was
found out in SRU tests and that particular release went ahead without
the patch. Since that LP is kind of in hard-to-follow/confusing states,
opened this new bug to carry out the SRU work.
** Affects: ceph
** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
Status: Triaged => New
** Changed in: cloud-archive/train
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
Status: Fix Committed => New
** Changed in: cloud-archive
Status: Fix Released => New
** Changed in: ceph
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936136
Title:
ceph on bcache performance regression
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu
** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
** Changed in: cloud-archive/rocky
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
** Changed in: cloud-archive/stein
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Verified that log compactions occur in bluefs with read/write I/O.
Attaching test notes.
** Attachment added: "queens_sru_1914911"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914911/+attachment/5500895/+files/queens_sru_1914911
** Tags removed: verification-queens-needed
** Tags adde
This (incorrect) patch is in upstream master and backported to Nautilus,
Octopus, and Pacific. This isn't critical and doesn't break
functionality - except for an incorrect error message if user attributes
modification fails. However, the reported problem still exists. So I've
marked all verificati
** Tags removed: verification-ussuri-needed
** Tags added: verification-ussuri-failed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914584
Title:
[SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confu
Confirmed that the patch needs re-work. So marking all verification
failed.
I've opened an issue in upstream tracker [0]. Submitted the patch
upstream [1]. Once that gets approved, backports to Nautilus, Octopus,
and Pacific to follow.
I am not sure how 15.2.11 release can be worked around whethe
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
verification-needed-groovy
** Tags added: verification-failed verification-failed-focal
verification-failed-groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Submitted patch upstream: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/41065
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914584
Title:
[SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message confusing if user with
With SRU verification test, it doesn't quite work as intended. I believe
the problem is with the upstream patch [0].
I've asked for clarification/confirmation [1]. I'll then have to mark
the verifications failed, I am afraid. This obviously affects 15.2.11
release as well. I'll try to get this fix
The regression that this patch fixes wasn't introduced (or backported
to) Luminous by upstream. So this doesn't affect Bionic (confirmed by
checking Ubuntu's latest Bionic source too).
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because
Thanks, James. Do you know this is in the SRU queue and when this patch
might be committed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914584
Title:
[SRU] radosgw-admin user create error message
Attaching debdiff for Hirsute.
** Attachment added: "hirsute-debdiff.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914584/+attachment/5486157/+files/hirsute-debdiff.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Attaching debdiff for Groovy.
** Attachment added: "groovy-debdiff.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914584/+attachment/5486155/+files/groovy-debdiff.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Attaching debdiff for Focal.
** Attachment added: "focal-debidff.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1914584/+attachment/5486154/+files/focal-debidff.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
