Public bug reported:
My original problem was that leiningen was not able to download a
project's dependencies, instead it gave errors containing
"java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors
parameter must be non-empty"
I have verified this with a minimal Java program (attac
** Attachment added: "Error messages"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1768799/+attachment/5132896/+files/ssltest.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768799
Also affects Artful,
Linux peter 4.13.0-17-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 6 10:04:08 UTC 2017 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 17.10
Release:17.10
Codename: artful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Apologies. When I reported that the bug seemed to be fixed for me (comment #3)
this was because I had added a symlink from /usr/share/scan-view to
/usr/share/clang/scan-view-3.8/share and forgotten that I had done so.
Without this symlink the bug is still present.
--
You received this bug notif
As requested by martijntje, a list of packages on the system. Please let
me know if I can provide more information.
** Attachment added: "Output of 'apt list --installed'"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-defaults/+bug/1578803/+attachment/4678790/+files/apt-list--installed.xz
--
This seems to now be working for me. I cannot see what, if anything, has
changed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578803
Title:
scan-view fails
To manage notifications about this bug
Public bug reported:
Running scan-view from the terminal, for example 'scan-view
/tmp/scan-build-2016-05-05-204234-1723-1'
Gives an error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/scan-view", line 143, in
main()
File "/usr/bin/scan-view", line 140, in main
run(port,
Upon further research, it looks like all the i386 packages for
openoffice.org are at the same version as the openoffice.org-common
package for PPC. This makes sense, since it's an architecture-
independent package. But since all the rest of the PPC packages are
still on another version, the whole
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org-common
When installing Gutsy on PPC, openoffice.org is not installed because
openoffice.org-core and openoffice.org-common depend on each other, but
their respective versions don't match the requirements in the
dependency.
The specific con
