On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:57:26 - Colin Watson
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:14:07PM -0000, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > And it isn't a "hack", this is exactly what ifup/down scripts are
> > for.
>
> They're useful for giving sysadmins the flexi
his because if you remove it you're
going to harm anyone who changes addresses frequently.
However, I have not used Ubuntu in many years (this is 2017, the bug
report was 2007) and I am no longer in a position to help you.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
You recei
its own this would happen.
And it isn't a "hack", this is exactly what ifup/down scripts are for.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Dave Walker writes:
> Can this bug be reproduced on Lucid?
I'm not running Lucid yet. However, you can check if the defect is there
just by reading a couple of files, you don't need to ask anyone to
reproduce it.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
I've unsubscribed from the bug report. It could have been fixed in a few
minutes one way or another at any time over the last few years but no
one did, which is a sad commentary on the management of the project.
Anyway, after years of this bug report remaining in limbo I've ceased to
care what happ
One would imagine that this bug could have been fixed any time in the
last couple of years. It would require editing a couple of files on the
part of one of the maintainers. Is there a good reason this has not been
completed?
--
ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created
https://b
At this point I'm unsubscribing from the bug report. I no longer know,
or care, if the problem is still extant. Maybe it is and maybe it isn't,
but after a couple of years of the bug living in limbo I've ceased to
care, and I'm no longer running an Ubuntu laptop.
--
ntp daemon not reconfigured by
rna writes:
> Perry E. Metzger wrote on 2009-09-14:
>> No it isn't. Other operating systems don't have the problem.
>
> Chip has bug, but the workaround there, the patch said.
Whether other OSes have workarounds or whether the bug is purely in the
software, the effe
rna writes:
> This is a bug of chipset.
No it isn't. Other operating systems don't have the problem.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
g has been left untouched for years.
> Please note that every "me too" and "why isn't this fixed
> yet" spams many people's inboxes with these useless messages.
They're only useless if you believe the problem should be ignored.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger
chiacchio writes:
> 2009/7/28 markofealing
>> I really can't believe that this has not been fixed, I mean USB 2.0 is
>> THE way of connecting devices to PCs these days.
>>
>> Come on guys, sort out your priorities. It's stupid bugs like this which
>> return Ubuntu users back to the "dark side".
kernel-janitor writes:
> This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated
> comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed.
> Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release
> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download .
It is still a
mira writes:
> I had the similar problem happened just today and i really need help
> with it. If some body knows anything, please let me know. I tried to
> install wireless driver on my Ubuntu 8.04 since it is not able to
> configure the internal wireless card, i tried to use Trendnet TEW-424ub
veryone with a USB
problem has tossed in a report onto this -- there's a massive smog that
makes it hard for people to figure out what is actually going on.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launc
Stefano_PG writes:
> Today I noticed that my VIA based PCI controller seems to be affected by
> this bug too. It always runs well, but if I plug more than one device
> the controller resets.
That's not the same bug.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.la
btanoue writes:
> I recently found a new work-around that works for my system. I stumbled
> on this by accident. I ran out of USB ports on my desktop box, and
> purchased a CyberPower (Powered USB Hub) off Buy.com.
This is not a new work around. There are others earlier in the error
history wh
dhd writes:
> I'm really amazed that the upstream developers are either not aware or
> don't want to fix this!
I filed a bug report. So far, it appears to have been rigorously
ignored. I'm still hoping.
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
network-m
Steve Conklin writes:
> This doesn't appear to be a problem with any particular driver, so I'm
> removing it from kernel bugs
Well, it might still prove to be a misdesign in the kernel interface to
wireless drivers in general.
Perry
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.l
Howard Chu writes:
> Interesting. Is that WPA with a Pre-Shared Key? I use WPA/EAP and
> obviously had the problem. Haven't tried WPA2 at all.
My bad behavior is easily reproduced on a WEP network. I think it
happens regardless of the type of encryption in use.
--
Perry
This feels kind
> of a regression to me.
I think not having your network function is a bit more of a regression.
Clearly there are a number of issues in NetworkManager, of course.
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs
Alexander Jones writes:
> Regardless of whether I am connected or not, when I open the NM menu to see
> broadcast networks, it is going to have to scan then, right?
No, not necessarily.
Perry
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You received thi
t everyone else is describing. It has
*similar* symptoms, I'll fully agree, but not *identical* symptoms.
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You received this bug notification because you
1:40
> (CMU)
> May 1 13:43:11 slim NetworkManager: (eth1): supplicant connection
> state change: 7 -> 3
> May 1 13:43:11 slim NetworkManager: (eth1): supplicant connection
> state change: 3 -> 0
> May 1 13:43:14 slim NetworkManager: [1241199794.536253]
&
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #580185
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580185
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
previous message on the list, I've already
> spent as much time as I can afford on this, and I prefer the behavior
> with my patch to a NM that continues to invoke useless scans.
As do I, my machine is now working again.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.co
LuisMondesi writes:
> I got this same issue on an OQO model 02 with Jaunty
I don't see that from your dmesgs at all. At the very least, you haven't
shown us the critical dmesgs.
In any case, does applying the patch fix things for you? If not, you
have a different problem, because I'm 100% certa
issue on Jaunty for some corner cases but I haven't been paying
attention -- Jaunty is too new, and given how long it has been I haven't
even looked at all the scripts currently involved -- nothing quite like
having a bug report ignored for this long.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger
I can confirm that the patch Howard Chu has posted to NetworkManager
eliminates the bad behavior for me. I'm no longer getting disconnected
every 120 seconds and the network is far more usable as a result.
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You re
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
A version of the fixes to libxcb for Intrepid would be highly
appreciated. Anyone have a patched package for me to test out?
--
[MASTER] firefox-3.0b5 received an X Window System error: 'BadIDChoice'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220628
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
The problem is straightforward to see and is easy to confirm.
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110992
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Jonathan Thomas writes:
> See the last comment here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132713
Note the URL doesn't claim that it is policy not to support the Karma,
just that the work hasn't been done yet.
Lets forget that, though. There's a much deeper problem. Responding to
someone who fee
Lydia Pintscher writes:
> Perry: Please cool down. Jonathan is handling a few hundred bugs a
> day sometimes.
So?
> And the Kubuntu team has limited resources which need to be used
> wisely. Would you rather have a new package/a fixed bug or him
> spending a lot of time on a reply in a bugrepor
Jonathan Thomas writes:
> Amarok 2.0 no longer supports Rio Karma, so closing.
You know, in addition to the quality of your prose, I've gone over the
Amarok web site and I've been unable to find evidence that they dumped
Karma support. Not that (as I've noted) any of that probably matters to
you
Way to go with the sensitive treatment of the community, Jon Thomas!
People sit around waiting for a couple of years for a support issue to
be fixed for their hardware, limping along when things could Just Work
with minimal effort. Therefore, the right thing is to say to yourself
"oh, the new relea
Troy James Sobotka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Finally, I'd add that those who are disillusioned with Free Software
I'm not disillusioned with free software. I'm being forced to switch
from Ubuntu. There is a difference between being disillusioned with
free software and having your laptop un
Troy James Sobotka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am wondering if there is anything we can do collectively to help this
> along?
I think no one is looking at it. The first step would have to be to
get someone at Canonical to pay active attention to the problem and
take responsibility for having
zasq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does someone know if the problem will be fixed soon?
I don't know for sure, but my strong suspicion is that no one who is
in a position to fix the problem has any intention of ever working on
it. This report has been open for a long time and nothing much has
hap
ph3ar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My issue has been solved with this "trick" taken from
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/221983
>
> ** Attachment added: "usb_no_key_bug?"
>http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19579922/usb_no_key_bug%3F
This looks utterly unrelated to the probl
vista, where the
> minor differences between xp and vista exposed similar device bugs which
> sent vendors scurrying to produce driver updates.
That's not even a remotely apt analogy. Among other things, this bug
has been around since before the release of Vista and no one intends
to fix
TheBigT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is another confirmation that things are as horrible as they ever
> were after an update to Intrepid RC.
Same here. Nothing has changed, and given how little attention has
been paid so far, I doubt this bug will ever be fixed.
--
ehci_hcd module causes
: new high speed USB device
>>using ehci_hcd and address 99
Same issue.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The aironet card on my ThinkPad T30 works fine with the new kernel.
But did you have the problem before?
--
Cisco Aironet stopped working in Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
TDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey!
> Invalid? It's BROKEN!!!
Not to mention that hundreds of people have had the problem, and a
dozen duplicate problem reports got merged into this one.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You
Bug Watch Updater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ** Changed in: linux
>Status: Incomplete => Invalid
What!?!?!? Why was this changed to "Invalid"? It hits me almost every
day!
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You receive
I do not observe the time re-synchronizing itself under these
circumstances. In fact, I observe it getting significantly off, which
is quite irritating and the reason I figured out there was a problem
in the first place.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ntp dae
mouz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is present on:
> - dapper: yes
> - feisty: yes
> - gutsy: no
> - hardy: no
> - intrepid: no
What do you mean by "the problem is not present" -- what restarts ntpd
on gutsy or hardy? I still had this issue on Hardy when I last
checked -- I manually in
ake all of five minutes to fix if someone
actually wants to.
I'm re-setting the status, as the bug report is most certainly *not*
incomplete.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
ntp daemon not r
Hew McLachlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
> to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
I don't see what you are talking about. The information is all there.
> Please reopen it if you can give us the
Hew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the fix is straightforward, you may submit it yourself.
I did. Read the bug report. It is editing two lines in a file (or
restoring the file with the two lines edited if it was removed in
Intrepid).
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL
t ntp servers in use, and it will not
have the time properly synchronized.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ntp daemon not reconfigured by /etc/network
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Hew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You can read the status and importance guidelines at
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status and
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance .
I'm aware of them. The designation you've made makes no sense. I think
it is based on the fact that you don't understand the
Hew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
> Ubuntu better. I have tested using pool.ntp.org and it works well. This
> should be technically easy to implement, if it's decided this feature is
> worthwhile.
>
> ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Hew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
> Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
> any activity in it recently.
That's not my fault. I reported a bug and no one bothered to try
fixing it. That doesn't m
s already well understood. The problem is getting someone to
take it seriously to do something about it.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because y
FoolsRun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have solved this problem on my system by replacing my USB 2.0 PCI
> card.
That's not practical if you have a laptop.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification b
Mackenzie Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a new bug for me as of Hardy. And rmmod'ing ehci_hcd doesn't
> help any. It makes it worse, even.
Then it might not be the same bug.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You
Oisín Mac Fhearaí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hard to believe this bug hasn't been fixed yet tbh. There's obviously
> some workaround which allows other operating systems to deal with it
> and suspend/resume normally as well.
A number of OSes seem to manage it just fine, yes.
Perry
--
ehci_h
Following the previous directions (with a few difficulties -- I needed
to get the amarok_riokarma-mediadevice.desktop file out of the amarok
sources), I got my Karma working under Hardy. It would be nice to make
the thing automatically mount when it is plugged in (which I don't know
how to do) but
Leann Ogasawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to see if it makes a difference, care to test the Intrepid Ibex
> 8.10 kernel?
[instructions on how to test elided]
> Please let us know your results. Thanks.
This appears to fix my problems with my T40 -- at the very least, boot
proceeded normal
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14471931/dmesg.log
--
Problems with CD/DVD drive on IBM Thinkpad T41 under Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Under Hardy, I'm experiencing the following problems with my CD/DVD
(removable) drive:
1) When sleeping, the power light on the CD/DVD drive remains on, and
from what I can tell based on battery drain times, it appears that the
drive is indeed consuming power. Clearly somethi
** Attachment added: "lspci -vnn output"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14471955/lspci-vnn.log
--
Problems with CD/DVD drive on IBM Thinkpad T41 under Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Now, without any real explanation, it seems to be working again. The
report can be closed.
--
mplayer no longer works under Hardy on IBM T41
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225780
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
Daniel Gimpelevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On May 3, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
>> That's not a "solution". You're almost certainly just using the low
>> speed ports instead of the high speed ports. It should not be the case
&
rod40cool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this bug is solved for me. The solution for me was to not use
> the front USB ports on the front of the case but instead plug my ipod
> into one of the usb ports on the back of the case which are directly
> mounted on the motherboard.
That's not a "
Leann Ogasawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This seems to be a duplicate of bug 88746. Care to take a look. I
> realize it's a rather long thread of comments to follow, but I'd point
> you to comment
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/88746/comments/228
> which was mad
I can now confirm that Hardy still has the same problem.
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mplayer
Running under Hardy on an IBM Thinkpad T41 laptop, mplayer no longer
works at all. (Neither, it appears, does Totem.)
If I try to play a video from the shell, mplayer hangs for a while, then
pops up a window with what appears to be the first fram
pongtawat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RC is out, so it is likely that you and me are left to stay with 2.6.22
> kernel :(
I can't understand why this bug report is being ignored.
Perry
--
IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this b
pongtawat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FYI, Gutsy 2.6.22 kernel seems to work fine.
That is my experience too. If I boot an old kernel, I have no problem
at all. This is absolutely a regression against Gutsy.
Perry
--
IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
o the
people who might fix the bug.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
I note that the bug report is still listed as "incomplete" although it
has been some days since I posted the requested information. The clock
is also ticking on auto-deleting the bug report. Is there something else
I need to add before the report will be considered complete? I'd hate to
have report
** Summary changed:
- T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
+ IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
** Description changed:
- I upgraded a T40 to Hardy. The machine goes quite nuts with a 2.6.24
- kernel -- booting the old 2.6.22 kernel works more or less fine.
- Symptoms include a l
By the way, things have improved slightly. With the absolutely latest
Hardy kernel, boot still hangs for quite a while before succeeding and
sound is still dead, but the ethernet now comes up. The wireless is
still dead, though.
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098098/lspci-vvnn.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098087/dmesg.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
** Attachment added: "version.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098056/version.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Leann Ogasawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you able to at least make it through the boot process to be able to
> grab some log information?
Yes, I can do that.
> If so, can you attach the following (be sure to attach each as a
> separate file and not as a tarball).
Will do right now.
>
I just realized, I should have said an IBM Thinkpad T40. I'm not
entirely sure what sort of machine information will be needed by
whomever will be helping to debug this -- just tell me what commands
to run and I'll post the output here. (Please specify if you need me
to be running the broken kerne
Public bug reported:
I upgraded a T40 to Hardy. The machine goes quite nuts with a 2.6.24
kernel -- booting the old 2.6.22 kernel works more or less fine.
Symptoms include a long hang during hardware probes and failure to
properly initialize a bunch of the hardware thereafter.
** Affects: linux (
a gps reciever does not cost that much).
GPS signals can be externally corrupted with an appropriate
transmitter as well. There is no actual way to prove you have the
correct time. (This is one reason very few protocols require accurate
timekeeping for security.)
--
Perry E. Metzger
Alexander Konovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm concerned with the security implications of using a pool of unknown
> time servers per default.
Most other OSes out there do this or variations on it now, so it would
hardly be an Ubuntu specific problem.
There are only security problems fo
This would appear to be the same as 98608, which I reported a year ago.
--
Cannot mount USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95428
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
Jukka Laurila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gutsy has the same problem and the temporary workaround "rmmod ehci_ucd"
> works there as well.
Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't have to use a workaround.
Perry
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this
Pedro Villavicencio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This does not appear to be a bug report and we are closing it.
It would be neat if you guys could spend as much time paying attention
to complaints as you did to stifling them. The complaint, I will note,
was not about the bug itself.
> We apprec
ed so things don't die without anyone
knowing whether they're important or not.
(The particular responsible party appears to have left many hundreds
of bug reports in this state, which appears to be unusual. A proper
tracking system would have escalated that at some point.)
--
Perry
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless you have a Canonical support contract, the fact that a bug isn't
> fixed as quickly as you would like isn't a bug.
I didn't ask that it be *fixed*. It could be a legitimately hard
problem that might take years to fix, or it might be that I'm o
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Filing another bug isn't going to help.
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
>Status: New => Invalid
And what will help? Shutting up and ignoring things perpetually?
This is a valid bug. It is a bug in the bug management
system. Declaring it invalid isn
Until someone actually bothers to touch the original bug report, I'm
afraid that declaring this one "invalid" isn't going to help either.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => New
--
A bug I reported has been in limbo for 5 months.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144089
You received th
Public bug reported:
I reported 98608 a very long time ago.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/98608
The person assigned to it seems to have ignored it in the interim. (I
note by clicking on his name that he seems to have done the same thing
to many other bug repo
I'm starting to wonder whether anyone actually cares at all. Five months
and you can't even assign a priority to the bug?
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact fo
Public bug reported:
Raph Levien's excellent monospace font "Inconsolata" is really great for
software developers who have to stare at a screen all day:
http://www.levien.com/type/myfonts/inconsolata.html
It made debian package-of-the-day recently:
http://debaday.debian.net/2007/08/15/rd-ttf-in
I'm having the same problem (evince working badly on a laptop with
1400x1050 display and a Radeon). What are the negatives of
XAANoOffscreenPixmaps if any, and is there a real fix that will go into
Gutsy eventually?
--
[gutsy] very hi cpu usage when scrolling pdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i somehow must be blind ... can you tell me where those log messages end
> up for you?
grep for them in /var/log if you're running NetworkManager. They're
pretty unmistakable.
Perry
--
Executes wpa_supplicant in too verbose mode
https://bugs.launchp
Does it really take three months to decide if a bug that prevents users
from touching any USB high speed peripheral is important or not?
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I can tell for a start that the above isn't right because what if
> sshd isn't running?
Then no real harm is caused -- but several of the other scripts in
network happily test for this sort of thing already.
Here is how to do it. The test you are
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
If you have a laptop that roams, you want your ntp daemon to restart
when you change networks so that your time remains synchronized. This
would normally be done by scripts in /etc/network/if-up.d/
/etc/network/if-up.d/ntp and /etc/network/ntp-server
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
>Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
FYI, this need not stay "wishlist" for long -- it will take
less than five minutes to actually add ssh.
Just to make it clear:
in /etc/netw
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 07:59:26AM -, Stefan Björk wrote:
>> Is changing syslog facility/level an redirecting all the output to
>> /var/log/debug (or similar) an alternative?
>
> I don't think that all output should go to debug ... I agree that we
>
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
