Even Microsoft released patch for their OSes for a week ago.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371758
Title:
tzdata need update
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
Still no news.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371758
Title:
tzdata need update
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/13
Wow. Nearly two weeks later, and still not even the decency of an ack.
I wonder whether this person's duplicate report will be treated as shabbily:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lo-menubar/+bug/753631
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
Hi,
This bug duplicates the one I reported a while back, and which was
completely ignored. Hopefully your report will not be :-(
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lo-menubar/+bug/753631
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Can someone have the decency at least to confirm they have read this?
I'm not sure if users should be bothered to submit bug reports.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753631
Title:
Wind
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of widgetless opened test document"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753631/+attachment/1994605/+files/denuded_libreoffice.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: lo-menubar
MY SYSTEM:
Release 11.04: fresh Natty Beta install, fully dist-upgraded since.
THE PACKAGE VERSION:
lo-menubar:
Installed: 0.1.0-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 0.1.0-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 0.1.0-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu
I can confirm that the latest version of Unity (aptitude full-upgrade
just now) on my Intel-GPU netbook also redraws menus much more slowly
than under Maverick's Compiz.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
I would like to confirm that this bug is STILL present, and means that
my system, which allowed compositing under previous versions of Ubuntu,
now does NOT allow compositing.
--
No hardware acceleration on ATI Radeon 3650 HD using 'radeon' driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534662
You receive
I would like to confirm that this bug is STILL present, and means that
my system, which allowed compositing under previous versions of Ubuntu,
now does NOT allow compositing.
--
No hardware acceleration on ATI Radeon 3650 HD using 'radeon' driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534662
You receive
Right. So my computer, which worked fine via Compiz in Karmic, is now
almost unusably slow and Compiz-less in Lucid, and this bug remains
unassigned just a week or two before release.
Still, it's only a substantial regression in an LTS. Why bother fixing
it when there are window-gadget-positions t
I must report that Robert Hooker's suggestion above made no difference
to my situation: compiz will not start even after that command and a
reboot.
--
No hardware acceleration on ATI Radeon 3650 HD using 'radeon' driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534662
You received this bug notification bec
I can confirm that I am seeing exactly the same thing with my Radeon
9200 in the latest Lucid (dist-upgraded this evening, the 28th of
March). No compiz unless KMS is turned off. Even then, it is
substantially slower than it was with Karmic. Indeed, non-composite 2D
has degraded substantially too:
I can comment that this happens with me as well. My laptop runs lucid
(clean install from lucid nightly two days ago and dist-upgrade das per
30 minutes ago). I have set it to log in automatically from reboot, as
the above reporters did too.
It creates the default keyring, but then appears unable
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-MEMORY.DMP.gz Properties.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29917932/Screenshot-MEMORY.DMP.gz%20Properties.png
--
8GB gzip archive showing as 4GB through graphical interface
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409185
You received this bug notification because you
Actual file
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8587825152 2009-08-04 19:27 MEMORY.DMP
and compressed file
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4991802343 2009-08-04 19:27 MEMORY.DMP.gz
--
8GB gzip archive showing as 4GB through graphical interface
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409185
You received this bug notificatio
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29917907/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29917908/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29917909/ProcStatus.txt
--
8GB gz
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: file-roller
Hi
I have a 8GB windows server memory dump compressed with gzip and the file roller
shows the content of the file at 4GB and fails to extract the content.
However, it works from the command line.
Description:Ubuntu 9.04
Release:
Guido Conaldi wrote:
> First of all, thanks for the hints, nickm.
>
> Loading sony_laptop and modifying /etc/acpi/sonybright.sh do make the
> brightness keys work again.
>
> However, sony_laptop is not loaded at boot even though I added it to
> /etc/modules. It seems to wor
Guido Conaldi wrote:
> I tried, but also /sys/class/backlight/ is empty in my up-to-date gutsy.
>
At a console, type:
sudo modprobe sony_laptop
sudo modprob sonypi
Then see if /sys/class/backlight is not empty.
If it works, add these lines to /etc/modules and reboot:
sony_laptop
sonyp
Guido Conaldi wrote:
> It seems that the function keys trigger /etc/acpi/sonybright.sh which
> requires /proc/acpi/sony/brightness in order to get the brightness
> level, but /proc/acpi/sony/brightness is missing in Gutsy at the moment
>
If you edit the file and replace all instances of
/proc/ac
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 76710 ***
I confirm that the FN-key brightness controls now no longer work for me
either under Feisty, on a Sony VAIO VGN T1XP. Modprobing sony_acpi makes
no difference.. They DID work under Edgy, without *any* modifications
required, and without the need for me
I confirm that the FN-key brightness controls now no longer work for me
either under Feisty. They DID work under Edgy, without *any*
modifications required, and without the need for me to compile or
install any additional kernel modules or helper scripts. The FN-keys
still work to control volume.
I confirm that the FN-key brightness controls now no longer work for me
either under Feisty. They DID work under Edgy, without *any*
modifications required, and without the need for me to compile or
install any additional kernel modules or helper scripts. The FN-keys
still work to control volume.
24 matches
Mail list logo
