[Bug 1504771] Re: First attempt to mount cifs always fails with "mount error(5): Input/output error" while second always succeeds

2015-12-07 Thread Neil Broomfield
Probably related too: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10604 Please fix. ** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #10604 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10604 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 595138] Re: Settings in /etc/hdparm.conf are not applied during boot

2010-09-23 Thread Neil Broomfield
Any chance someone can look into this issue, it's been going on for months now and I'd really like my raid array disks to spin down please. It's kind of basic fundamental functionality...even windows can do it correctlyIt’s these kinds of problems that really let Linux down, and it’s a real sha

[Bug 31072] Re: Hard drive BuffSize=0kB

2010-06-10 Thread Neil Broomfield
Same, running Ubuntu 10.04 AMD64, sdg is a Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB and shows a BuffSize of 0Kb, however sda is a WD RE3 1TB and shows a BuffSize of 32767kB. hdparm -i /dev/sdg /dev/sdg: Model=ST31500341AS, FwRev=CC1H, SerialNo= Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdT

[Bug 276476] Re: INFO: task blocked for more than 120 seconds causes system freeze

2010-04-15 Thread Neil Broomfield
I think It could be related to this ext4 bug on kernel.org...hopefully a kernel dev can shed more light on the issue? https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14830 I'm guessing this issue is also present on XFS too given the debug in comment #3 ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #1

[Bug 494476] Re: "Smbd", "kjournald2" and "rsync" blocked for more than 120 seconds while using ext4.

2010-04-15 Thread Neil Broomfield
I think It could be related to this ext4 bug on kernel.org..hopefully an ext4 dev can shed more light on the issue? https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14830 ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #14830 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14830 -- "Smbd","kjournald2" a

[Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-03 Thread Neil Broomfield
Thanks for the update guyssome usefull information there. I'll consider updating to Lucid RC to see if it fairs any better. -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Neil Broomfield
I tired KMS and can confirm that it seems to resolve this issue, however it currently comes with it's own problems, I’m sure this is because it’s still under heavy development, the most annoying of which was the lack of Mode lines previously available under X control. I posted something on this th

[Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Neil Broomfield
Still broken for mewould be really nice if this was fixed, Linux should be a multi-user system, I actually think this is quite important and quite embarrassing. Can we elevate this? -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You rec

Re: [Bug 514837] Re: Dunno actually, box just popped up saying please submit this bug report, so I did.

2010-02-02 Thread Neil Broomfield
Dear Ubuntu, Thank you for your reply, in that case it's probably best just to close/delete the bug report, as I said "I was doing about 5 things at once" and as such I'll be unable to give you a precise description/steps as to what caused the issue. Thank you for all your help. Regards Neil O

[Bug 514837] Re: Dunno actually, box just popped up saying please submit this bug report, so I did.

2010-01-30 Thread Neil Broomfield
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38561466/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38561467/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38561468/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachm

[Bug 514837] [NEW] Dunno actually, box just popped up saying please submit this bug report, so I did.

2010-01-30 Thread Neil Broomfield
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal Actually, I think I was moving a file "i.e. mv file.mkv /mnt/md0/Films" and wanted to open up a new terminal (instead of backgrounding the task, so I clicked file "open terminal" which normally works perfectly fine, but a new terminal never

[Bug 38131] Re: Firefox causes massive Xorg CPU usage

2009-12-01 Thread Neil Broomfield
A bit more background info for anyone who’s interested: After more digging there seems to be a number of bug call specifically relating to the issue with multiple users that I’m experiencing, some of the threads suggest it’s an issue with the first session locking the DRI/DRM and as such when a se

[Bug 38131] Re: Firefox causes massive Xorg CPU usage

2009-11-24 Thread Neil Broomfield
I’ve noticed a similar problem, but under slightly different circumstances, everything runs fine (Firefox, videos etc.) and typically the Xorg process is always less that 10%. My problem occurs when a seconds user logs on, for example the screen saved comes on, my gf clicks “switch user”/“change u