@mate ---
I checked the changelogs of the current Grub2 packages for Jammy.
I don't see patches for this issue yet. The last updates for Grub2
packages for Jammy were in April, and were for ARM, and a CVE security
update by you. Because that was "Security", I understand that those took
precedence
Those compatibility flags, mirror the pool create options I noted
above... With doing a snapshot of bpool, and Send'ing it 'somewhere',
even if that was to a flash-drive... Destroying the original bpool,
recreate the new bpool, then Receive, the snapshot back to restore it,
does fix that with less
I believe it to be a firmware issue... It should be move to another area
and filed against "something". This is not a question, nor a bug against
Launchpad...
This is a BUG.
But it "is" unknown just which piece, module, system, etc, "is" causing
his problem, to file it as a BUG against something
This User needs to submit his logs and errors, and do any back-traces
you all think necessary. He has worked with us at UbuntuForums, it seems
to be a case were it occasionally gets an error where "it cannot claim a
resource." The specific errors that it is getting, on the hardware,
seems to affect
Mine is a desktop with NVidia and has occurred since the update to
linux-generic-5.11.-00.34.
But the same machine works fine on Mainline 5.11.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943001
This had affected me... I discovered this when starting menulibre, as a
parse error.
On diagnosis of my system, I was just going to remove evolution and
reinstall it to to see if that fixed the problem...
# sudo apt-get remove evolution
Even though the evoltution-calendar.desktop file existed in
correction on last...
# removed
sudo update-alternatives --remove default.plymouth
/lib/plymouth/themes/ubuntu-sunrise/ubuntu-sunrise.plymouth
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699
Update-
This is how I fixed mine... Adapt to your own system.
# look at the old directory
ls -ltrd /lib/plymouth/themes
#look at the newer plymouth directory to compare
ls -ltrd /usr/share/plymouth/themes
if differerent, mobe the old to the newer...
sudo mv /lib/plymouth/themes /usr/share/plymouth
Apport is now catching a system error on /sbin/plymouth...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699
Title:
Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting
To manage noti
I see Cyber Sec committed those packages as a fix for this bug ... I
followed his recommends and tested. But I can confirm that they are not
a fix for mine.
What next? You need more info or a back-trace?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
As reference to trying the fix recommended by Cyber Sec in post #7...
That did not fix mine.
Downloading and manually installing those .deb packages ... Installed
fine, but it resulted in no change on mine (same errors).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
This also affects me. I marked my own bug report (Bug #1594204) as a
duplicate this.
I've already done an install --reinstall, as "axel" was afraid to do,
and that does not affect the error in any way.
Also, the files that that script is looking for-- are confirmed to be
physically on my system.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1525699 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699
After some more research, I'm marking this as a duplicate to Bug
#1525699. This is the same bug, and that one seems to be the original
bug report(?) Not sure that all my problems are covered by that, but at
I noticed that the apport dump had the correct default plymouth (showing
where default is pointing to... but apport incorrectly dumped the text
of another plymouth theme script (sabina) besides the one that is being
pointed to
Attached is the ubuntu-sunrise.script
** Attachment added: "ubuntu
Results of: $ ls /sbin/plymouthd && ls /bin/plymouth
/sbin/plymouthd
/bin/plymouth
So those two files are there...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594204
Title:
plymouth reports miss
As requested: File /var/log/apt/term.log attached
** Attachment added: "/var/log/apt/term.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+attachment/4687511/+files/term.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Message is:
/scripts/init-premount/plymouth: line 38: /sbin/plymouthd: not found
/scripts/init-premount/plymouth: line 38: /bin/plymouth: not found
/dev/sda3: clean 605474/22757376 files, 66338383/91016257 blocks
/scripts/init-bottom/plymouth: line 18/bin/plymouth: not found
Spoke too soon. Plymou
Public bug reported:
Just id a release upgrade from 14.04.3 LTS to 16.04 LTS. Now on login,
during plymouth init, console messages are reporting plymouth script
errors of missing file from various bin directories (will take a pic of
them and report then later).
Plymouth theme is not the default.
Public bug reported:
15.05 Gnome alpha 1 (on install from ISO) x 3 times.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
Package: ubiquity 2.21.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-28.38-generic 3.16.7-ckt1
Uname: Linux 3.16.0-28-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.15-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
Casp
This was my usual install script (attached).
Notice the comments at the minimum install of the XServer Core. Used to
install and work fine --withoutrecommends. Now I have to remove that
flag from it... and let it install full. There most be another
dependency there "somewhere" now. (not sure yet w
>From lspci:
00:03.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[AMD/ATI]
Rage XL PCI [1002:4752] (rev 27) (prog-if 00
xorg.0.log file from that server:
** Attachment added: "xorg.0.log file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-mach64/+bug/1375511/+attachment/4219766/+files/Xorg.0.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
System is now Server 14.04, with a minimal X install (openbox, etc...)
and package xserver-xorg-video-mach64 was installed and is the newest
version.
I just upgraded that server from 12.04LTS Server. Before the upgrade, it
had worked fine using startx to boot an instance of X
Remember that without xserver coming up, if you want info, back traces
or logs, that it will be from the command line from that server.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1375511
Title:
X
If you want to hear the kicker on that(?):
I just did a check of my install packages on that box... And nvidia-331-updates
NVIDIA binary driver - version 331.38 (ver 7.1) says it's installed. So it did
instal,l but somewhere/somehow set off an error report as a crash?
If you know me from helping
This is still a problem on one of mine (my main box that I also use for
the console for my servers).
This box has been running 14.04 and nvidia-current (331.38) since it's
realease. Only reason was going to 331.xx update was that I run Gnome 3
and for some reason 331.xx boink's any resolutions but
Working fine in Unity and Gnome3... Problem just in Gnome Fallback.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174034
Title:
gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing.
To manage notifications ab
I am mistaken in that this error also includes nautilus.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174034
Title:
gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing.
To manage notifications about this bu
One other note- If I select the "_" decoration on the gtk.Window, the
whole top bar on that window grey's out losing focus... and act's if it
is unresponsive. If I then select the app from the lower taskbar, then
it regains focus and starts working normally (all working correctly)...
until closed a
Public bug reported:
(Gnome Fallback) Since upgrade to 13.04- Gedit not exiting from the "x"
decoration or minimizing from the "_" decoration. Selecting "X" will
minimze the app.
Fill menu will close doc's and exit. Right click on lower taskbar> close
will quit app... But GTK window taskbar "X" w
I am one of those "duplicates" joining this bug as directed, because
someone pointed my bug report as a duplicate to this one.
Of note- I have a work-around. I noticed that after I run Brasero and
exit, the process is still running. That is why it is not starting a
"new" instance of Brasero.
So m
//***
~$ brasero -g --brasero-media-debug > log 2>&1
~$ cat log
** (brasero:7386): WARNING **: An instance of Brasero is already running,
exiting
~$ pidof brasero
2585
:~$ kill 2585
***//
...and it works again without a reboot. But the new instance also stays loaded
after exit.
This may be a dup
I've been using Ubuntu since 8.04LTS... And I've been testing U+1 for
4-5 years on other boxes and servers here, but this is on my main
everyday box (no U+1 dev).
I cleaned things up on this one and did a fresh re-Install 37 days ago.
It did this in v12.04 also (7 days ago upgraded this box to v12
Public bug reported:
On a fresh system boot, Brasero runs well. After burning ISO to disk and
closing application, Brasero will try to start ("Starting Brasero"),
then just go away. Have to reboot to get it going again.
Seem's like Brasero is not exiting gracefully, so cannot restart.
ProblemTyp
Had been working with this user on forum thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2112027
I've confirmed that his /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness data
can be changed, but those changes do not get picked up.
What he didn't mention yet... is that if he does reboot to MAC OSX,
c
Had been working with this user on forum thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2112027
I've confirmed that his /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness data
can be changed, but those changes do not get picked up.
What he didn't mention yet... is that if he does reboot to MAC OSX,
c
Tried to submit-
"apport-collect 923594" logged into launchpad... but don't see it here. Tried
to resend, but now apport collect gets a segmentation fault. (???)
When it collects it, does it write it anywhere where I could submit it
remotely?
--
You received this bug notification because you a
v10.10, Same. v10.04.3 installed fine but- "Segmentation Faulty Tree"
error even after "sudo rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin" (which usually fixes
that). That means no updates, upgrades nor a release upgrade. Cannot
install a browser. I can ssh into it to extract info from other boxes.
Other notes- r
Okay, so these tests are with a bare board = none of the RAID Cards or
it's SCSI card.
11.04 froze at loading additional components. 11.10 froze at same point.
11.10 with a 32bit Intel Card thrown in... continued through hwdiscovery, saw
both the Intel Card and the onboard Broadcom card. Selecte
I just looked through my past launch pad bugs. I had this board up previously
on Server 11.04:
Bug #829846 You can see the info there... Curious why it's having errors now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923594
Title:
Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of
Server...
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs
Public bug reported:
Hewlett Packard TC2120 Server (Rebranded ASUS NRL-LS motherboard)
Have tried installing Ubuntu Server, versions 12.04 alpha, 11.10, 11.04,
10.10, 10.04. All versions fail at either the initial base system load
(such as a bootstrap error) or at an get/apt error or the package
Here is one of the user's xorg log.
** Attachment added: "Users Xorg.0,log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nv/+bug/902636/+attachment/2627374/+files/Bub.Xorg.0.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
xserver-xorg-video-nv is in the repo's thru Natty. Then is not found in
the repo's of Oneiric and Precise.
If this package has been replced by another, there is no indication of
this at Debian or X.org. On nvidia user's of Onieric and Precise(dev),
this throws an error in t
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902636
Title:
missing xserver-xorg-video-nv
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-n
I checked again tonight = bugzilla.kernel.org still down.
Since you here don't want to file upstream and talked me into it... I'll
continue this through. (although I thought that was what the Kernel Team
did, but no matters.)
> One alternative would be to report this directly to the subsystem mai
Quoted from- Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury), Post #7:
>Would it be possible for you to open an upstream bug report at
>bugzilla.kernel.org?
Tried To...
Quoted from kernel.org:
>>Reporting Linux Kernel bugs
>>
>>Please see http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/reporting-bugs.html if
>>you wan
But Debian 6.0 with kernel 2.6.32-5-686 does work with the "text" kernel
boot parameter.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352
Title:
Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runl
Oh, By the way... this also happens in Precise Pangolin 12.04 pre-alpha.
But that's not really a fair statement, as we only had access to those
repo's since last Thursday. Not really enough diversity between those 2
versions yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Mainline kernel 3.1.0~rc10 (linux-
image-3.1.0-030100rc10-generic_3.1.0-030100rc10.201110200610) has same
results.
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
So no activity from any lauchpad team yet?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
Title:
linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Offhand the past 5 days helping user with what broke has been
adventurous...
I think the main update issue lies in the dist-upgarde process. In the
last 3 dev testing cycles, one thing has been nagging at ne is that
there is no prior testing to see if an existing previous version will
successfull
Public bug reported:
Past kernel boot lines, tool runlevel arguments at boot time. In other
distros, you added "1" for single user text, "2", "3", "4" or "5" for
multiuser text mode... Ubuntu, along the way changed this and used the
kernel boot option "text". Somewhere between natty and oneiric,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352
Title:
Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as
boot options.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
I reported this one from a generic VirtualBox install of 11.10 so anyone
can reproduce it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352
Title:
Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take ru
Okay... Re-ran apport-collect 829846 from that server after reseting my
launchpad password... Had to overcome some texted-based browser issues,
but in background it said it sent and is waiting for launchpad to
respond... With a message saying "Almost Finished." Following the link
from there got me
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298277/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
Titl
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298276/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
Title:
li
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298275/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
Title:
linu
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298274/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
Ti
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298273/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8298
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo_.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298272/+files/ProcCpuinfo_.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298271/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
Ti
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298270/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
Title:
linux
apport information
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298269/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846
Title:
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected natty
** Description changed:
nopam and apm=off now has no effect in Ubuntu Server versions 11.04 and
11.10. I noticed this in 11.04 alpha thru release and 11.10 prealpha
thru alpha3. These 2 kernel boot options should turn off APM (powe
Did I mention that it happens on all my servers? I have single cpu and
dual cpu; intel and amd cpu; 11.04 and 11.10... The one I pulled offline
to test for this has an HP ASUS LRT-LS Server board with Ubuntu Server
11.04 x86 installed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
The above attachment was via "ubuntu-bug linux" from that server...
Since that server did not has no desktop installed on it or a text-based
browser installed, I copied the apport report to a shared data
directory... Which I accessed from my main desktop machine that
autologs into Launchpad using
** Attachment added: "apport.linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic-pae.LfaqfF.apport"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2293452/+files/apport.linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic-pae.LfaqfF.apport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Public bug reported:
nopam and apm=off now has no effect in Ubuntu Server versions 11.04 and
11.10. I noticed this in 11.04 alpha thru release and 11.10 prealpha
thru alpha3. These 2 kernel boot options should turn off APM (power
management) and prevent the console monitor from going blank at th
Just saw this bug while researching another problem... Reference the
question in #17, I recommend to others both the get-edid of package
read-edid to get the EDID of a display using the coomand line...
" get-edid > edid1.bin "
...or if they can get gnome to display, using nvidia-settings to
gener
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787274
Title:
package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gconf
While running updates...
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.39-2.8-generic-pae 2.6.39-rc7
Uname: Linux 2.6.39-2-generic-pae i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu May 19 23:1
** Summary changed:
- Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
+ Un-Identified Process causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Many bugs have been refried as a duplicate of this bug,
Helping people on this support forum sticky:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10740083#post10740083
We;ve found that most of the time where they would need to use acpi=off or
noacpi to get graphics to work, that it did cause other ac
After talking with a lot of people since filing this and seeing that
triage was going in the strange directions with this problem... I spent
a lot of time doing more homework and research. I spent a lot of time
on IRC # grub yesterday talking with a few of their dev's and support's.
I followed th
I re-read edited):
>>Timo Aaltonen wrote 14 hours ago: #4
>>
>>If you need to add GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD=text to /etc/default/grub, then it's a
>>kernel bug.
>>
As explained above-- If you manually set the variable of GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD
or GFXMODE and it works... then it does not seem to be a kernel b
Like I said. I don't have this problem on this box or my 4 other's. I
do have other 2 test boxs that are currently running Oneiric Ocelot
11.10 that I could pull down to reinstall 11.04 and recreate this
problem with various hardware (Intel or AMD CPU's; nvidia, ati or intel
video chipsets)... Or
Adding GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD=text to /etc/default/grub tries to over-ride the
variable set gfxpayload=$linux_gfx_mode in 10_linux where GNU says that
if set in the/etc/defau;t/grub :
## QUOTE ##
GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX'
Set to `text' to force the Linux kernel to boot in normal text
mode, `keep'
Got sidetracked,- It causes a few different problems, but shares a
common cause: Not being able to find and sett a valid graphics mode.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445
Title:
Xo
@Bugbot- This is not an "nVidia" thing. The happens with nVidia, ATI
Radeon, i915, Sandy Bridge, etc. This causes an nVidia chip instlled
consurrent with a Sandy Bridge no to be quesried and return it's mode
data.
Basically, it seems to be causing graphics modes data to be returned in
correctly,
** Summary changed:
- Yorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
+ Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
Refered by:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+question/157114
Reference:
Since implementation of KMS technologies at Ubuntu version 10.04, transitions
have occurred where the graphics is first set and how, via:
"Kernel mode-s
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 762478 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762478
Wait a minute... This crossrference here says to be in error:
Remember: This is a duplicate of Bug 762478 (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/762478)
How is this Bug a duplicate of "[nouve
Sorry--
grub-common, 1,99~rc1-10ubuntu1
grub0pc, 1.99~rc1-10ubuntu1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756267
Title:
grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND,,
menu_color_no
grub-common, 1.99~rc1-10ubuntu
grub-pc, 1.99~rc1-10ubuntu
grub2-splashimages, 1.0.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756267
Title:
grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND,,
To recreate, I used the " sudo apt-get install grub2-splashimages " to
install images that were previously known as comaptible with Grub2
backgrounds.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/7562
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub-coreboot
The current grub theme package and these release candidate grub packages
now has problems with each other. Things that worked previously for
grub theming should work but are now broke.
GRUB_BACKGROUND= with the installed grub theming packa
Okay-- It must not be assumed any longer. marked this solved. (a non-
problem)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755771
Title:
Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cle
The sys logs "journal" right? Why don't I just do "each" and upload the
journals of the sys logs?
On -H... I never did that before this. "sudo shutdown 1" always brought
it down cleanly to a powerdown in 10.10 without any other flag. Maybe
in that version, it was assumed? (and this just a chan
Does not boot into the grub menu... Boot into the linux recsue text menu
--Light blue background, blue box, red menu items... with options such
as drop down to root commandline...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Server 11.04beta1 32bit. Was clean install on box that
successfully ran Server 10.10 32bit with the same packages.
"sudo shutdown 0" starts shutdown seqeunce, reboots into linux rescue mode menu
where it keeps looping into itself.
"sudo shutdown 0 -r" goes through shu
Update/Observation -- I know you all have bounced this around pointing
fingers here and there (Samba group, server group, Rhythmbox group...
etc) I think as last (as I remember) you had changed it from samba to
server...
Well here's a wrench to throw at that logic --> I just set uo one of my spa
Changes in the updates for samba 2.3.5.4 had no affect on my problems
(these bugs) // They were the same and still present. I took wins back
out of nsswitch.conf and they were all gone again. I was optimistic,
but my hopes were soon crushed...
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Okay-- Ubuntu updates tonight that include samba_3.5.4... to include
changes in "winbind." I don't know yet if any of these new updates will
affect these bugs (my fingers fingers are crossed), but will check on
mine once they finish downloading and installing. Will report back
soon.
--
You rec
Sorry the bug at end of comment #35 should have been bug #7027730 (no
edit function here).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714
Title:
rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_get
My bug (#7027730) has been ID'ed as a diplicate of this bug... even
though it effects a lot more on mine than just what I see in this bug->
Ubuntu One Music Store puggin cannot be loaded at all or Rhythembox will
not start; Ubuntu's Last.fm, Jamendo and Magnatude pluggins crash
Rhythembox if I try
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714
Omer--
Ah... No.
Bug 529714 is on the Ubuntu One Music Store plugin. This PC, even
though it "is" having problems there, presently does not have it
installed-- and has other problems. I knew that "that"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714
Got it... f bug #529714. Checking out now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702730
Title:
cras
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714
Reference Comment #9:
Omer (sorry about mispelling your name previously), All these trace were
done with Ubuntu One Music Store "uninstalled." It won't even start with
it installed on this PC.
Regerence Comm
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
