[Bug 1641238]

2019-05-28 Thread Michaelo-p
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #47) > Yes, likely scheduled for 2.4.40, missing one vote only. > Please note that the patch has been updated to v6 to resolve some conflicts > from unrelated changes already merged in 2.4.40. Genius, I will try the new patch tomorrow against 2.4.39. -- You

[Bug 1641238]

2019-05-28 Thread Michaelo-p
I can see in Subversion that this patch has several +1 votes. Is it scheduled for 2.4.40 then? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title: as a reverse proxy, a 100 continue respons

[Bug 1641238]

2019-04-03 Thread Michaelo-p
OK, I have it now. For some reason the patch hunk against CHANGES and the docs fail to apply. I have removed those hunks and the patch applied cleanly now. Here is the output from curl: > + curl --verbose --http1.1 --anyauth -u : -f -s --upload-file > target/lda-docgen-webapp-0.2-SNAPSHOT-backen

[Bug 1641238]

2019-04-03 Thread Michaelo-p
Just tried to apply v5 to 2.4.38 and 2.4.39 from the FreeBSD ports system. It is incompatible along with the other patches available there: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/tree/master/www/apache24/files Since 2.4.39 is already out and does not include this patch what is the status? I'd li

[Bug 1641238]

2019-02-27 Thread Michaelo-p
I have just noticed that v4 is available of the patch. I have removed v2 from ${FILESDIR} and added v4, recompiled and reinstalled apach24 port. It works flawlessly as before with v2. What did change? Does it affect the user? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 1641238]

2019-02-19 Thread Michaelo-p
Dropped patch v2 to the files directory of the FreeBSD ports, patch applied cleanly, reinstalled 2.4.38 and ran my test: > $ curl --verbose -X POST --upload > $HOME/sitex-document.3305025974265279540.zip > https://blnn719x.ad001.siemens.net/ld-docgen/rest/documents --negotiate -u : > -H 'Conten

[Bug 1641238]

2019-02-19 Thread Michaelo-p
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #32) > Thanks Michael for the very appropriate test: first 401 which avoids the > "100 continue" danse and thus gets forwarded with "connection: close", > second 201 with the full thing. > > Great! Thank your for the extensive patch. Looking forward to see th

[Bug 1641238]

2019-02-14 Thread Michaelo-p
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #27) > Proposed for backport to 2.4.x (r1853409), let's see what other committers > think, notably if it's too much of a change for the stable branch. If so, > this will have to wait for next 2.6/3.0... Yann, I will happily try this patch against 2.4.x next we

[Bug 1641238]

2019-01-21 Thread Michaelo-p
This also blocks CONNECTORS-1564. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title: as a reverse proxy, a 100 continue response is sent prematurely when a request contains expects: 100-

[Bug 1641238]

2019-01-10 Thread Michaelo-p
Folks, can we please backport to 2.4.38 finally? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title: as a reverse proxy, a 100 continue response is sent prematurely when a request contain

[Bug 1641238]

2018-11-07 Thread Michaelo-p
Can we please backport this to 2.4.x branch? It is not present in 2.4.35 :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title: as a reverse proxy, a 100 continue response is sent prematur