@ChristianEhrhardt: I'm not sure how to determine whether systemd-
resolver is forwarding back to dnsmasq, hopefully it's clear from the
output:
mdroth@sif:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND --
If it is of any help, Stefan Hajnoczi has been working with me to help
fix the regressions introduced by the CVE-2016-5403 fix (upstream QEMU
commit afd9096, which is in 2.6.1 stable release) in a follow-up 2.6.2
release.
So far the following patches have been identified as being needed in
order t
Quoting Mike Rushton (2016-04-05 17:22:24)
> Sorry, I copied the wrong thing:
>
> sudo qemu-system-ppc64 -enable-kvm -m 256 -display none -nographic -net nic
> -net user,net=10.0.0.0/8,host=10.0.0.1,hostfwd=tcp::-:22 -machine pseries
> -drive file=xenial-server-cloudimg-ppc64el-disk1.img,if=
Quoting Mike Rushton (2016-04-05 16:47:29)
> @mdroth
>
> I don't think PPC supports kvm the same way as x86:
>
> ubuntu@alpine01:~/kvm$ qemu-system-ppc64 -enable-kvm -m 256 -display none
> -nographic -net nic -net
> user,net=10.0.0.0/8,host=10.0.0.1,hostfwd=tcp::-:22 -machine pseries
> -dr
Quoting Mike Rushton (2016-04-05 13:10:17)
> ubuntu@alpine01:~$ sudo ppc64_cpu --smt=1
> ubuntu@alpine01:~$ ppc64_cpu --info
> Core 0:0*1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> Core 1:8*9101112131415
> Core 2: 16* 17181920212
Quoting Mike Rushton (2016-04-04 09:49:29)
> ubuntu@alpine01:~$ ppc64_cpu --info
> Core 0:0*1*2*3*4*5*6*7*
> Core 1:8*9* 10* 11* 12* 13* 14* 15*
> Core 2: 16* 17* 18* 19* 20* 21* 22* 23*
> Core 3: 24* 25* 26* 27*
Quoting Serge Hallyn (2016-04-01 11:56:29)
> Hi,
>
> I've redeployed my test box with 14.04 with kilo-staging archive, but i
> get a core dump when i try to run kvm the same way you did.
What does `ppc64_cpu --info` report? The original bug had some output
that suggested SMT was enabled:
> cpu
; $ qemu-system-x86_64 -netdev tap,sndbuf=0,id=netdev0 \
>-device virtio-blk-pci,netdev=netdev0
>
> The 'sndbuf' option has type "size".
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
Reviewed-by: Michael Roth
> ---
> This patch ensures tha
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:22:58PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 26.11.2012 13:10, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> >> visit_type_size() requires either visitor->type_size() or
> >> visitor_uint64() to be implemented, otherwise a NULL funct
