In that case you probably want to change the tag from verification-
needed-noble to verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083554
Title:
error: snap "subiquity" is no
Apologies for the slow review here. There is one minor problem and one
more serious one.
The minor problem is that Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser in debian/control
point to a non-existent repo on salsa (I assume this is just default
output from dh-make-golang or whatever it is called?). Can you please
up
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 22:10, Frank Heimes <2102...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> cd /sys/block
> ls
> loop3 loop5 loop7 loop0 loop2 loop4 loop6 loop1
>
I'm not 100% on this but if those are all the devices you see in /sys/block
then could you be looking at a kernel problem that is not pick
> - UKIs don't work with mem attribute protocol + secure boot enabled,
this is likely due to systemd's borked hooking of the SEC ARCH 2
protocol pointer, which i assume is in protected memory...
This makes sense because other systems boot after all. Is this "borked
hooking" only in newer systemds?
Looking at the uninstallability report found raku-file-find as well so
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -a
armhf -a arm64 -b -m "Remove even more rakudo related binaries from armhf and
arm64." -s plucky raku-file-find
Removing packages from plucky:
I am very confused as to how mediaconch 24.06-3 migrated without
something being done about this and also why mediaconch-gui is not on
the NBS report! But anyway:
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -a
ppc64el -a s390x -a riscv64 -m "Remove NBS mediaconch-gu
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -m
"Remove packages that transitively depende on pcre3 (LP: #2103916)" -s plucky
lomiri-sync-monitor libsynthesis
Removing packages from plucky:
lomiri-sync-monitor 0.6.0-4 in plucky
lomiri-sync-mon
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -a
armhf -a arm64 -b -m "Remove more rakudo related binaries from armhf and arm64.
LP: #2100916" -s plucky raku-json-fast raku-tap-harness raku-getopt-long
Removing packages from plucky:
raku-json-fast 0.19-1 in pl
I've reuploaded the package with a better version number to unapproved,
sorry about that.
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
I've reuploaded the package with a better version number to unapproved,
sorry about that.
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
What a mess. What is different about hybrid / core boot that triggers this
that isn't impacting regular Ubuntu? I mean the installer boots and that's
using the same shim and grub (or at least it's certainly suppose to!!)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -a
riscv64 -b -m "Package no longer builds on RISC-V (LP: #2103944)" -s plucky
lziprecover
Removing packages from plucky:
lziprecover 1.24-2 in plucky riscv64
Comment: Package no longer builds on RISC-V (LP: #21039
Hmm I guess nl80211_get_ie can return NULL so the caller should check
for that?
It's sort of amazing how little I remember about _nl80211module.c given
I wrote all of it...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
There were arm* builds in proposed still from earlier uploads:
Removing packages from plucky-proposed:
moarvm 2024.09+dfsg-3 in plucky arm64
moarvm 2024.09+dfsg-3 in plucky armhf
moarvm-dev 2024.09+dfsg-3 in plucky arm64
moarvm-dev 2024.09+dfsg-3 in plucky armhf
Com
lamassemble and nanook are arch: all packages so not appropriate to
remove in this context. sigma-align only depends on last-align in its
testsuite so marking this as a badtest on armhf seems more appropriate
as and when that blocks something (removing the binary now would not
prevent a new one bei
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -a
armhf -b -m "New upstream fails to build on armhf (LP: #2067621)" procdump
Removing packages from plucky:
procdump 1.2-4 in plucky armhf
Comment: New upstream fails to build on armhf (LP: #2067621)
Remove [y|N]?
Appears this bug is complete, please reopen if I've missed something!
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098393
Title:
[needs-pa
You will need to prepare versions to upload that have versions lower
than that in oracular or plucky and then find someone to sponsor the
upload (some documentation here
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess), then wait for SRU review (I
am not an SRU team member)
** Also affects: euslisp (Ub
I am unsubscribing ~ubuntu-archive as there is nothing for the archive
administrators to do at this point; the packages with dependencies on
jhead need to be modified first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
This looks like it was completed in December so closing.
** Changed in: sahara (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053004
Title:
[RM] sahara a
It appears there is nothing for ~ubuntu-archive to do here currently so
unsubscribing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069154
Title:
Please remove matchobox-panel from oracular
To ma
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -s
plucky -m "binaries now built by src:samba (LP: #2099735)" tdb
Removing packages from plucky:
tdb 1.4.12-1build1 in plucky
libtdb-dev 1.4.12-1build1 in plucky amd64
libtdb-dev 1.4
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -s
plucky -m "binaries now built by src:samba (LP: #2099736)" tevent
Removing packages from plucky:
tevent 0.16.1-3 in plucky
libtevent-dev 0.16.1-3 in plucky amd64
libtevent-dev 0.16
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./remove-package -s
plucky -m "binaries now built by src:samba (LP: #2099739)" talloc
Removing packages from plucky:
talloc 2.4.2-2build1 in plucky
libtalloc-dev 2.4.2-2build1 in plucky amd64
libtallo
I think this particular change happened in the kinetic timeframe.
Closing bug as invalid, feel free to reopen if I misunderstood?
** Changed in: ldb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
The package is in release now, for whatever reason the bug didn't get
closed but it is clearly complete so closing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098879
Title:
[needs-packaging] cry
The packages have now built and are in plucky's release pocket so making
as fix released.
> BTW, how do we back euslisp/jskeus to noble? Or should we try to
upload to noble-update? noble-backport?
It's not impossible to include new packages in a stable release update
(i.e. noble-updates) but it m
** Changed in: euslisp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096808
Title:
Sync euslisp/jskeus from Debian unstable
To manage notificati
I started a riscv64 ubuntu-server:live build with the livecd-rootfs from
proposed and it succeeded:
https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/test/+build/755221
so this can be marked verified.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-don
th-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhu
FWIW the obvious thing to cause this would be a difference in the kernel
config for the generic and generic-64k kernel. Here's the diff between
the configs (as extracted from the debs):
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/PsKk9DYV4S/ -- this is a lot more than I was
expecting but there's no obvious (to me)
Here's a few lines from the journal (from early startup, well before
subiquity is doing anything):
Feb 25 15:45:30 ubuntu-server systemd[1]: Starting
modprobe@dm_multipath.service - Load Kernel Module dm_multipath...
Feb 25 15:45:30 ubuntu-server systemd[1]: modprobe@dm_multipath.service:
Deacti
nce: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Hudso
Public bug reported:
As indicated in the summary, xdg-desktop-portal-dev now recommends
fonts-inter-variable and so ends up on component mismatches.
There seem to be two reasonable ways forward: filing an MIR for fonts-
inter (there is a streamlined process for font MIRs:
https://github.com/canon
This packages is pulled in by a seed now so:
(main)mwhudson@orcrist:~/src/ubuntu/ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./change-override -c
main -S xdg-terminal-exec
Override component to main
xdg-terminal-exec 0.12.1-2 in plucky: universe/misc -> main
xdg-terminal-exec 0.12.1-2 in plucky amd64: universe/x11/opt
No it looks like it does. So I don't know what is going on here. Would
it be possible to get the journal / syslog / dmesg type output as well?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100148
Tit
The error seems to be this
Detected multipath support, reload maps
Running command ['multipath', '-r'] with allowed return codes [0]
(capture=False)
161.606954 | DM multipath kernel driver not loaded
finish:
cmd-install/stage-partitioning/builtin/cmd-block-meta/cl
** Also affects: gcc-14 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098505
Title:
glibc 2.41 ppc64el: math test failures
To manage notificati
Removing packages from plucky:
mongrel2 1.12.2-3build3 in plucky
mongrel2-core 1.12.2-3build3 in plucky amd64
mongrel2-core 1.12.2-3build3 in plucky arm64
mongrel2-core 1.12.2-3build3 in plucky armhf
mongrel2-core 1.12.2-3build
Removed again:
Removing packages from plucky:
openjdk-22 22.0.2+9-5 in plucky
openjdk-22-dbg 22.0.2+9-5 in plucky amd64
openjdk-22-dbg 22.0.2+9-5 in plucky arm64
openjdk-22-dbg 22.0.2+9-5 in plucky armhf
openjdk-22-dbg 22.0.2+
We've just removed euslisp and jskeus from the sync blocklist.
** Changed in: euslisp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096808
Title:
S
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-archive as it is only open because of the debian
task
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098656
Title:
pybdsf: Please RM from plucky
To manage notifications about
Removing packages from plucky:
scummvm 2.8.1+dfsg-2 in plucky s390x
Comment: now fails to build on s390x; removed from Debian; see LP: #1094162
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: scummvm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug not
** Changed in: preprepare (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: postgis (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: pgauditlogtofile (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
** Changed in: pglogical (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089236
Title:
Remove NBS 32-bit postgresql extension packages, part 5
To
There is a patch available, up to V3 now
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-February/675616.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098505
Title:
glibc 2.41 ppc64el: math tes
I was right, it is the differing baseline and it turns out someone has
already filed a gcc bug for this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118541
** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #118541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118541
--
You received this bug notification becau
I spent a little while poking at this, inconclusively. I wonder if the
difference with debian is down to the different baseline (which I
believe is power8 for Debian and power9 for Ubuntu).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Marking this invalid because of previous comment.
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
I'm not on a network where downloading a recent desktop ISO makes sense
but I'm pretty sure these are hard links to the same file. I don't know
how to get unsquashfs to show this, but from a random livefs build
artifact I have lying around:
mwhudson@orcrist:~$ sudo mount
~/tmp/seed-in-live-layer/
Public bug reported:
[impact]
riscv64 server live installer builds break currently:
E: Unable to locate package linux-generic-hwe-24.04
There is not (and is not intended to be) a HWE kernel for riscv64 so we
shouldn't try to offer it.
[test case]
start a riscv64 ubuntu-server:live livefs build
Public bug reported:
appmenu-gtk-module 24.05-1.1 dropped the appmenu-gtk2-module package
which all the various appmenu applet / plugin packages Recommend and
they should stop doing that. TIA.
** Affects: vala-panel-appmenu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You receive
Oh is this interacting with the code I added to try to have live-build
_not_ nuke the preferences files pro ships?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097467
Title:
live-build removes /e/
Also I think changing "dh_makeshlibs -plibllvm$(LLVM_VERSION)" to
"dh_makeshlibs -plibllvm$(LLVM_VERSION) -VUpstream-Version" will mean
that things like e.g. rebuilding bpftrace will pick up a versioned
dependency on libllvm18, which would make the sort of problem that
happened in 2097317 apparent
** Description changed:
[impact]
bpftrace 0.20.2-1ubuntu4.2 is broken with the version of llvm-toolchain-18 in
noble-updates:
Regression from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpftrace/+bug/2081848
root@nsnx2:~# bpftrace
bpftrace: error while loading shared libraries: libLLV
** Description changed:
+ [impact]
+ bpftrace 0.20.2-1ubuntu4.2 is broken with the version of llvm-toolchain-18 in
noble-updates:
+
Regression from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpftrace/+bug/2081848
root@nsnx2:~# bpftrace
bpftrace: error while loading shared libraries: libLLV
** Also affects: bpftrace (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097317
Title:
bpftrace: error while loading shared libraries: libL
I am removing this version of llvm-toolchain-18 from noble-proposed so
we can get a fixed version of bpftrace to noble users who have already
upgraded. We should copy it back once that has been done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson)
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Description changed:
+ In the version of initramfs-tools now in plucky, mkinitramfs fails
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097280
Title:
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 122: cannot open
/sys/module
Ah this might be specific to server builds -- it runs update-initramfs
in a binary hook without doing anything to make sure /sys is mounted...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097280
Tit
> I'm skipping the aging check this time
I'm pretty sure we never care much about the aging check for livecd-
rootfs but maybe this isn't written down anywhere?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Chris and I reviewed this package as part of my AA training
today. Unfortunately we found a few more things to fix:
1. In debian/copyright, can you please include a comment (as in
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#comment-field)
to the Files: stanza for p
** Changed in: debian-cd (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2086841
Title:
Please remove cd-boot-images-* from plucky
To manage
I took one of Guillem's patches and uploaded it to my devirt ppa
https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+archive/ubuntu/devirt/+sourcepub/16867111/+listing-
archive-extra, perhaps I should just upload it to plucky...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I poked Guillem about this and this bug report seems to be the same
issue, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092051 which
suggests that the actual regression is in make (something about make's
starting of subprocesses in $(shell ...) now being a lot slower)
** Bug watch added: Deb
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- debhelper sequencer is doing excessive dpkg-buildflags calls
+ buildflags.mk is doing excessive dpkg-buildflags calls
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872381 and
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077005 seem related
(and gosh make is a terrible programming language). I think this
probably affects Ubuntu worse than Debian because we added RUSTFLAGS to
the list of variables to expor
I think the excessive calls are coming from
/usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk rather than debhelper, perhaps? It seems
to call --get for the flags which do not get a value (ASFLAGS,
RUSTFLAGS_FOR_BUILD, ASFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) an astonishing number of times.
--
You received this bug notification because y
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
I don't see this locally (in a schroot/sbuild). Do you have a package
that reliably shows it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093107
Title:
debhelper sequencer is doing excessive dpkg
I uploaded the patch to plucky:
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading util-linux_2.40.2-1ubuntu2.dsc: done.
Uploading util-linux_2.40.2-1ubuntu2.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading util-linux_2.40.2-1ubuntu2_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading util-linux_2.40.2-1ubuntu
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2086455
Title:
manifest not generated for ubuntu-cpc uefi hook
Oops. I'll fix that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2086841
Title:
Please remove cd-boot-images-* from plucky
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
You can check which revision of debian-cd is in use by looking at a
build log like
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/cd-build-
logs/ubuntu/plucky/daily-live-20241125.log
which has the line:
Using revision b7109349c7be6a9a0b6a670cb9c154363fb45e4d of debian-cd
And that revision is:
commit b
> Note that APT measures the space of /usr when it checks if enough
space is available, and not /, but snaps install to /snap
/snap is just a bunch of mountpoints. Did you mean /var or more
specifically /var/lib/snapd/snap here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
I doubt it's proxies. But it could be that snapshot.ubuntu.com is not
available from the livefs builders -- which would be something that we'd
need to fix to work on this feature!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Running germinate -s ubuntu.noble --no-rdepends -m
https://snapshot.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/20240301T030400Z works for me
locally. I wonder what is going on. It's not something daft like ca-
certificates not being installed on the builder and so https doesn't
work?
--
You received this bug notificatio
Unless I'm confused this should be fixed in tools/boot/oracular/ in
debian-cd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083919
Title:
Oracular Oriole ARM64 ISO + install has boot console showin
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/24.10.23 should
hopefully fix this once it has migrated and a new daily has been built.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081185
Title:
I've uploaded the jammy and focal versions too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105
Title:
cloud-images do not produce sboms
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
I've uploaded the noble branch to the queue after some messing about and
force pushing to make the upload history and git history align.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077105
Title:
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077603
Title:
debsum of /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon failed
To manage
I've uploaded to the SRU review queue now:
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading live-build_3.0~a57-1ubuntu49.1.dsc: done.
Uploading live-build_3.0~a57-1ubuntu49.1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading live-build_3.0~a57-1ubuntu49.1_source.buildinfo: done.
Uploading live
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2077603 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077603
Is this the same issue as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/2077603 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
They are passing again now. Noone did anything to fix them! But I guess
we should close this now...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080759
Title:
pristine-tar autopkgtests fail agains
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading rustc-1.81_1.81.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1.dsc: done.
Uploading rustc-1.81_1.81.0+dfsg0ubuntu1.orig.tar.xz: done.
Uploading rustc-1.81_1.81.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading rustc-1.81_1.81.0+dfsg0
FWIW it seems the tests only fail with PRISTINE_ALL_XDELTA=xdelta, not
the default PRISTINE_ALL_XDELTA=xdelta3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080759
Title:
pristine-tar autopkgtests
I think the main difference is that some files are not stripped, in
particular /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/cc1 and
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/lto1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
I've sponsored the fix into oracular. Hopefully we can check it fixes
the issue there before SRUing it to noble.
** Also affects: live-build (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug n
-installer builds continue to be broken in some way.
** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson)
Status: In Progress
** Also
I built a livefs
(https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/test/+build/667772)
and it built fine. I made it into an ISO and that revealed that we need
some subiquity changes in the ubuntu/noble branch as well but that's not
a problem with the livecd-rootfs changes.
I also built a deskt
** Description changed:
I added code in oracular to build an installer for UC24. We would like
to (slightly) productionize this installer and so building on a noble
base would be better.
[test plan]
We should build a livefs with a command like:
- $ start-livefs-build --livefs=~mwhu
** Summary changed:
- backport ubnutu-core-installer code to noble
+ backport ubuntu-core-installer code to noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076307
Title:
backport ubuntu-core-i
I don't think it's necessary to block this until the build for newly
added subarch support succeeds, it's enough to be confident that it
doesn't regress any current builds I think? (speaking somewhat biasedly
as someone wanting to get a change that is on top of this one into
noble-updates)
--
You
Public bug reported:
I added code in oracular to build an installer for UC24. We would like
to (slightly) productionize this installer and so building on a noble
base would be better.
[test plan]
We should build a livefs with a command like:
$ start-livefs-build --livefs=~mwhudson/+livefs/ubuntu
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Changed in: systemd-hwe (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069383
Title:
ftbfs in oracular and noble
To manage notifications abo
My fix migrated (I forgot to reference this bug in the changelog)
** Changed in: mescc-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072472
Title:
After remembering about gdb's starti command to start debugging at the
very first instruction, I think this is an upstream bug in the test and
filed https://github.com/oriansj/mescc-tools/issues/47 and will upload a
simple fix.
** Bug watch added: github.com/oriansj/mescc-tools/issues #47
https
1 - 100 of 2202 matches
Mail list logo
