Matthias, I'm sure your opinion is important here. But can we please
argue this on technical merit?
Currently the argument is "a new macro will be used by developers to
create more harm than good" and "feature tests are a better way to solve
the problem the version macro should solve". I don't buy
It's lots of text to go through so you probably missed it. My patch was
specifically also meant for future packages of GCC so that a bug like
this one is easier to handle.
Short recap:
- GCC x.y.z != Ubuntu GCC x.y.z because Ubuntu applies patches.
- in most cases this is fine, but sometimes it ma
Changing this to "won't fix" without even addressing my patch is quite
frustrating. OTOH ignoring the patch is quite as bad... I'd really like
to have a comment why my patch is not wanted / needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
The lines
addresses=
routes=
in [ipv4] lead to the crash.
I tried to attach a file, but Launchpad ignores me...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241590
Title:
NetworkManager daemon se
Public bug reported:
After the update to 13.10 my network didn't come back up. After a bit of
investigation I found the following problem:
root@Drazi# gdb --args NetworkManager --no-daemon
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
the updated skype package does not show this problem anymore
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173091
Title:
skype cr
Public bug reported:
After the update to Raring Skype doesn't start anymore. This is the
backtrace:
Starting program: /usr/bin/skype
[...]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08075f40 in malloc@plt ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x08075f40 in malloc@plt ()
#1 0xf40dbe0e in ?? () from /usr/l
Public bug reported:
I have the following setup:
/boot unencrypted
/ and swap in LVM over encryption with luks
/data encrypted with key stored on / (no LVM, filesystem is directly created on
/dev/mapper/data
/etc/crypttab contains this line:
data /dev/sdb /sdb.key size=...,cipher=...,hash=...,no
Sorry, I won't be able to find the time to test this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893550
Title:
Oneiric fails to boot after upgrade from Natty if /etc/fstab contains
a cgroup mou
I did a new install of 12.10 and experienced the same bug. I found a
simple workaround: Create an empty file /etc/initramfs-
tools/conf.d/cryptroot . Afterwards mkinitramfs will do the right thing
and fill this file with the right data.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Public bug reported:
I cannot reopen #734693, so here's a new report. Apparently the fix for
#734693 only applies to the SysV init script, but not to the upstart
config. All my Ubuntu installations use upstart - so the issue is not
solved yet.
** Affects: cron (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Hi,
we're running 11.04 on a system and cron fails to work correctly, showing the
following error in the log:
"cron[1067]: (mkretz) ORPHAN (no passwd entry)"
The user is certainly in the LDAP - and sometimes the users crontab works as
expected. So there still is a race in the startup scripts in
I just encountered this problem (but with mysql running). "mkdir
/usr/share/redmine/tmp" made the script work. In my case the tmp
directory was required by the gitosis redmine plugin.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Hi, question: How does the upgrade QA work? Does it rely solely on users
that do the upgrade at Alpha and Beta stages? Do you have a simple way
to repeat upgrade processes to test the progress of stabilization?
Actually I'd be happy to do upgrade tests (especially since my experience is
that some
The patch looks like a good solution to me.
As admin I would appreciate a warning somewhere though. Probably best if
it goes to syslog.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893550
Title:
O
I confirm that cgroup-lite is installed. That's also the package which I
reported the bug against in launchpad. Seems to be a launchpad feature
to hide that information. ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Public bug reported:
I used LXC on this machine. Therefore I had to add a cgroup mount and added the
recommended line
none /cgroup cgroup defaults 0 0
to /etc/fstab. This results in an unbootable system after upgrade to Oneiric.
Apparently the boot just stops when it comes to mounting the entrie
A distributer macro for GCC was discussed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00275.html . Result of the
discussion was, that Nathan Sidwell already created a very simple patch
against 4.5 that enables this via the --with-specs configure switch.
This is already available in the code-base of the
On Wednesday 25 May 2011 15:18:57 Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by
> incompetence! I forgot who said (something like) that, but it's
> certainly true in programming.
:) sure. Just checking what you meant by your previous statement.
> I know
I agree that it is much nicer to be able to use feature tests/macros
instead of compiler-version ifdefs. But library headers really don't
have any other way to work around compiler bugs or use new compiler
features. One can not expect from library users that they will correctly
define all required
I can understand your standpoint. But I'm sure you can understand that I
find this highly unsatisfactory.
But what I would really like to discuss is what measures you're taking
that this is not going to happen again? Are you looking into a macro
that can identify the distribution (I'd be happy to
Sorry, false alarm. The patch works perfectly. The error was due to
something with icecc not getting properly updated. With icecc disabled
all compiles as expected.
To enable the patch I added a line to debian/rules.patch. After line 20 add
$(if $(with_linaro_branch),restore-avxintrin-compatibilit
#8 is not enough. But I don't understand why. This is the error now:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5.2/include/avxintrin.h: In
function '__vector(2) double _mm_maskload_pd(const double*, __vector(2)
double)':
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5.2/include/avxintri
I don't understand what you mean? What was reverted on what branch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780551
Title:
incorrect interface in avxintrin.h
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
testing this patch now, it reverts the r168900 commit (after gcc-
linaro.diff applies it)
** Patch added: "restore-avxintrin-compatibility.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/780551/+attachment/2135139/+files/restore-avxintrin-compatibility.diff
--
You received this
Vanilla GCC 4.5.3 also has this source incompatible interface change in
avxintrin.h. But, and this is very important, it has a different
__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__. Thus, code can use the correct interface with a
simple #ifdef. Therefore, I consider the change in GCC 4.5.3 bad, but
ok. (IMHO a source inco
#4 should give you an idea what needs to be fixed. Sadly it's not good
enough as it results in an ICE now. The Ubuntu GCC is so heavily patched
that I find it very hard to get this right. A helping hand with more
experience would be sooo welcome!
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Patch added: "reverted source incompatilbe AVX interface change"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/780551/+attachment/2134996/+files/gcc-linaro.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gcc-4.5
The following code compiles with vanilla GCC:
__m128 m, x;
float *mem;
#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ == 4 && (__GNUC_MINOR__ < 5 ||
(__GNUC_MINOR__ == 5 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <= 2))
_mm_maskstore_ps(mem, m, x);
#else
_mm
I just went through the list at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp
/Common-Predefined-Macros.html and there's nothing that can help me
distinguish the Ubuntu GCC vs. a vanilla GCC 4.5.2.
I also looked through the gcc-4.5.2 package sources, whether I would be
able to create a custom package that doe
Hi,
any thoughts on this? I will have to make library releases that do not compile
on Natty unless you can look into this with me.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780551
Title:
Attached is a solution to the problem. It might be better to fix it in
atd itself (i.e. use something different than sleep, or install a signal
handler).
** Attachment added: "/etc/pm/sleep.d/ script to fix the problem"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at/+bug/783835/+attachment/21319
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783835
Title:
atd fails to execute jobs in a timely manner after sleep/hibernation
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: at
How to reproduce:
put a job into atd. E.g.
% echo "date > /tmp/atd.stamp"|at 11:00
Then put the computer to sleep. After wakeup, the job will not execute at 11:00
anymore - or if that time has already passed, it should execute right away, but
often t
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780551
Title:
incorrect interface in avxintrin.h
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gcc-4.5
The following code compiles with vanilla GCC:
__m128 m, x;
float *mem;
#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ == 4 && (__GNUC_MINOR__ < 5 ||
(__GNUC_MINOR__ == 5 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <= 2))
_mm_maskstore_ps(mem, m, x);
#else
_mm_maskstore_ps(mem, _m
I worked around the problem by changing the GTK_ Appearance - Widget
style to Raleigh instead of the preselected oxygen-gtk.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775586
Title:
Gimp Crashes
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652766/+attachment/1661736/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
crash while writing to address -1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652766
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: virtuoso-opensource
Apport reported a crash, but since it includes a core dump I will not
send the report from there. :-(
Segfault at $rip = 0x7c41b4: movq $0x,
0x
-> It seems the code jumps to a code path it should never
"sudo apt-get remove myvr3dframework" fixed my problem
--
Could not install 'nspluginwrapper' while upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.35-22-generic
E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/iscan failed with return 1.
I was able to get it going by removing the iscan package and
reinstalling it later again.
--
Could not install 'initramfs-tools' while upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
htt
** Attachment added: "system_state.tar.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/652492/+attachment/1659956/+files/system_state.tar.gz
--
Could not install 'nspluginwrapper' while upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652492
You received this
** Attachment added: "term.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/652492/+attachment/1659955/+files/term.log
--
Could not install 'nspluginwrapper' while upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652492
You received this bug notification becau
** Attachment added: "main.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/652492/+attachment/1659953/+files/main.log
--
Could not install 'nspluginwrapper' while upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652492
You received this bug notification becau
** Attachment added: "lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/652492/+attachment/1659944/+files/lspci.txt
--
Could not install 'nspluginwrapper' while upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652492
You received this bug notification bec
** Attachment added: "history.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/652492/+attachment/1659939/+files/history.log
--
Could not install 'nspluginwrapper' while upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652492
You received this bug notification
** Attachment added: "apt.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/652492/+attachment/1659916/+files/apt.log
--
Could not install 'nspluginwrapper' while upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652492
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status
139
I also found this in the dmesg log:
kernel: [53954.090752] nspluginwrapper[13555]: segfault at 968 ip
7f30604d4790 sp 7fff9f8a81f0 error 4 in
libpthrea
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: initramfs-tools
Sorry, this is all the information the logs and error dialog provide:
"subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
status 1"
** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
C
Store the attached file to /etc/hal/fdi/information and your Samsung
NC10's brightness keys work again. This is a workaround only.
** Attachment added: "10-laptop-panel-hardware.fdi"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49574910/10-laptop-panel-hardware.fdi
--
Intel GMA X4500HD - LCD Brightness Cont
This seems to be the problem:
%lshal -l -u /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/computer_backlight
udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/computer_backlight'
[..]
laptop_panel.brightness_in_hardware = true (bool)
Thus PowerDevil/Solid only register the brightness key presses but don't
actually set the br
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48613037/Dependencies.txt
--
misconfiguration results in error message: "Can't open and lock privilege
tables: Table 'mysql.servers' doesn't exist"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581829
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
After cleaning the akonadi configuration in ~/.local/share/akonadi and
~/.config/akonadi the resulting default configuration results in the
following entries in the MySQL error log on Akonadi startup:
100517 14:45:14 [Warning] Can't open and lock time zone table: Table
'mysq
Following behavior for me:
- Brightness keys show the OSD but don't change anything.
- Adjusting the slider in KDE4's battery applet does change the brightness
- changing the power profile in the battery applet also changes the brightness
(as would be expected from the point above)
- volume keys w
** Attachment added: "lsof | grep cups"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35827362/lsof-cups
--
cups in Hardy leaks file descriptors: "too many open files"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484872
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cupsys
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS
Release:8.04
cupsys:
Installed: 1.3.7-1ubuntu3.6
Candidate: 1.3.7-1ubuntu3.6
Version table:
*** 1.3.7-1ubuntu3.6 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages
500 ht
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic
This is a Samsung R65 laptop with the following hardware:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS/940GML and 945GT
Express Memory Controller Hub (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM
That's what I wrote in the top post:
> only that I lost data which I could have recovered if only I could have
> read /proc/kcore.
It's just like grepping /dev/hda? if you deleted a file in error: I
wrote a text and I couldn't get back to it (it was in a web browser text
field and the browser didn
> in general, this does not need to be available
What defines the need? I had a need for /proc/kcore yesterday and I had
the need before.
> exposes memory that could contain very sensitive data
Yes it does. But it's only exposed to the root user. And the root user
can do anything to the system.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.15-26-686
/proc/kcore is available, but opening it as root always returns -EPERM.
It really should be readable as root - and it is in vanilla kernels and
also in the kernels on previous ubuntu releases. If you found a security
reason to t
60 matches
Mail list logo
