(Upstream developer) 3.1.5 was primarily bug fixes and moving the backend
to Webkit.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> Are there any other new features in 3.1.5? If not, I agree syncing it
> sounds better.
>
> All the rebuilds are uploaded and waiting for the new sword,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933217
Title:
package ntop 3:4.0.3+dfsg1-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
To ma
Public bug reported:
happened during system upgrade
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: ntop 3:4.0.3+dfsg1-3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-13.53-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-13-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Feb 15 20:1
It turns out my issue was
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/584428 so this bug
should be closed (and the real bug fixed...)
--
Ubuntu takes forever to log in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644821
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: "greeter.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644821/+attachment/1620628/+files/greeter.log
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644821/+attachment/1620629/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
Ubuntu takes forever to log in
https://bugs.launc
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
After upgrading to 10.04, Ubuntu takes a long time to log in (2-3
minutes). I've asked about this here
http://ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/4406/ubuntu-10-04-takes-
forever-to-login and was directed to file this bug report, based on
information i
Hmm, fixing it by installing 1.9.1 gives me an idea. Don't we have
different packages where it's being build against 1.9.1? Is it possible
that during the upgrade the Xiphos package (though still the right
version) is actually the older package built against 1.9.1?
--
xiphos crashed with SIGSEGV
For anyone who's still having this issue after installing all of the
packages, see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/445009. That
fixed it for me.
--
Unable to Install any plugins - 3.5.1+repack~1-0ubuntu1 on Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477944
You received this b
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37418348/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37418349/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37418351/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
pack
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ebox-network
I purged all ebox packages, plus I did "sudo rm -rf /var/log/ebox". Then
the installation failed because it couldn't find /var/log/ebox/ebox.log.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jan 4 14:33:42 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9
This affects any application using xulrunner, not just FireFox
--
Firefox is flickering elements, drawing random lines, and other artifacts.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
Is their any way we can get more information on this? What happened,
what was the user doing, etc?
Matthew
Xiphos Developer
--
xiphos crashed with SIGSEGV in gui_update_tab_struct()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426347
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
The bug is now reported upstream at
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2871689&group_id=5528&atid=105528
--
xiphos crashed with SIGSEGV in main_update_parallel_page()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413697
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Sorry to not get back sooner, but we had a problem with Xiphos that
prevented me from building on Karmic for a while. I was able to
reproduce your bug under very specific conditions. Here's what I did:
1. run Xiphos for the first time (no Bibles installed or settings created)
2. during first run,
This patch fixes the problem. Sorry if I didn't do it correctly, I've
never done a patch like this before.
** Attachment added: "patch moves g_thread_init to the proper location."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32723477/g_thread_init.patch
--
cannot started
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3742
I have this problem as well.
--
cannot started
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubu
Hi, I'm an upstream Xiphos developer. Could you provide a little more
information on this crash? Here are a few questions:
1. Was this the first time you had run Xiphos?
2. How many Bible modules did you have installed at the time?
3. Which parallel were you trying to set? (1,2,3,4,5)
4. Did you h
The problem is easy enough to diagnose. In previous versions of
xulrunner, these headers were shipped as part of xulrunner-dev, so they
were in /include/xulrunner-[version]/stable. Now, for whatever reason,
these headers are not included in this package. Unless this is a
mistake, it looks like thes
YvanD
There is currently a packaging effort underway for both GnomeSword (just
recently renamed to Xiphos) and BibleTime. This will update BibleTime to
use the newer sword library. As soon as the updated BibleTime is
available, I will post back here (should be within a week).
--
This version is
I have this issue on Ubuntu 8.04 as well. This is a recent problem
(within the last month).
--
Locale settings not respected in GNOME session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnomesword
The current Gnomesword version is 2.4.1. Several of the bugs filed in
the launchpad against Gnomesword have been fixed. Why can't a new
version be added to the repositories?
** Affects: gnomesword (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
S
21 matches
Mail list logo
