Public bug reported:
With a running Nagios4 instance and more than 50 hosts the results are
paginated.
https://nagios.example.com/cgi-
bin/nagios4/status.cgi?hostgroup=all&style=hostdetail
Selecting a different # such as 100 from the 'Limit Results' dropdown
does not refresh the display (reload
Why was this set invalid? The change in
/etc/modprobe.d/audio_powersave.conf seems more of a work-around than a
fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885462
Title:
snd_hda_intel :0
Is this a written policy / guidance or just something you came up with
on the fly?
https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2018/02/16/on-python-shebangs/ has a
good discussion of this issue and even suggests using python2.7 (as
opposed to python2)
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Given that 5.2.24+ is needed to solve CVE-2019-2511 and Trusty is ~3
months until EOL is it even worth doing?
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-2511
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
We are seeing this too, on Bionic servers installed from netboot / PXE.
Bionic is (still) missing from the Affected
Status says "Fix Released" but where is that? I don't think it's true.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
DSA-4212-1
https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4212
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774061
Title:
git: CVE-2018-11235 arbitary code execution via submodule names in
.gitmodule
Still an issue in bionic final beta
To unlock root partition, and maybe others like swap, run `cryptroot-
unlock`
BusyBox v1.27.2 (Ubuntu 1:1.27.2-2ubuntu3) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
# cryptroot-unlock
ps: invalid option -- 'e'
BusyBox v1.27.2 (Ubunt
Impact here was an unbootable system (blank screen) not just an annoying
error message.
Had to boot into rescue mode to fix the files/links and run ldconfig
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
How about just add the 2.48 version in {xenial,yakkety,zesty}-backports?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568459
Title:
unison incompatible with older ubuntu/debian versions
To manage
Public bug reported:
A newer release is available at
http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/src/dnstop-20140915.tar.gz
Debian version is also (stuck) at 20120611-2
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dnstop&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
Concise list of changes since that vers
4 months, not a single movement on this one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922428
Title:
synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
To manage notifications about this bug
I've been having no end of problems with Remmina - intermittantly -
though I did notice that changing to an FQDN worked well (thanks for
that one). I see this as a regression - what about home LAN's that
don't have FQDN for hostnames? I've been forced to install
xtightvncviewer and grdesktop as a
Wow, really no-one keen to look at this bug, eh?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922428
Title:
synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
To manage notifications about this
A colleague of mine upgraded and saw an improvement on his system.I had a go at
upgrading but the Ubuntu 32bit package from http://synergy-foss.org/download/
threw up a bunch of 'bad package' errors so I gave up.
This is very frustrating!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
+1. Have been having constant, ongoing issues with wifi dropouts - but
only with 12.04 and only in the last several weeks (did not seem to be a
problem when I was running beta1. Came up later than that).
I have this on two machines, running Xubuntu and Ubuntu respectively,
but both 12.04 and bot
Among other things attempts to use 'alt-tab' seem to trigger this
segfault.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922428
Title:
synergys crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
To mana
root@radar:~# grep synerg /var/log/syslog | grep seg
Apr 27 15:57:21 radar kernel: [ 5586.880657] synergyc[2492]: segfault at
8b0a75c8 ip 0040dbf2 sp bfee4378 error 4 in libstdc++.so.6.0.16[3b6000+d8000]
Apr 27 16:21:02 radar kernel: [ 7008.450659] synergyc[3233]: segfault at
8b0a75c8 ip 002b2bf2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967857
Title:
Auto Hide for Panel 2 ("Dock" style Panel) randomly fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
Public bug reported:
I have found some odd behavior with Panel 2 (the 'dock' panel).
On at least two occasions it just disappeared (forced a reboot/restart of X)
and wouldn't appear when I moused in that direction.
One of these occasions it was on the left, Panel 1 at the bottom. I shuffled
thi
Public bug reported:
We saw soft lockup this morning on a Ubuntu Lucid 64-bit system with
kernel 2.6.32-33-server and jfs module shown here
root@db11e:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.32/fs/jfs# modinfo jfs
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.32-33-server/kernel/fs/jfs/jfs.ko
license:GPL
author:
Please release the fix!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750339
Title:
Request security update for CVE-2011-0009 request-tracker3.6 request-
tracker3.8
To manage notification
Per the debian bug report the package needing an update is libdata-
stream-bulk-perl NOT libnet-amazon-s3-perl
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608696
Title:
Moose error when loading li
Sorry I just backported 0.53 and it did not fix the problem
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608696
Title:
Moose error when loading libnet-amazon-s3-perl
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
** Summary changed:
- needs packaging dnstop 20110502
+ new version of dnstop 20110502
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780623
Title:
new version of dnstop 20110502
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dnstop
See http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/src/ for a new
upstream version (tarball)
** Affects: dnstop (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Marc - I'm curious why you think this isn't a security vulnerability.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725220
Title:
insecure img src in main.html
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
Reported upstream. See http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=206
** Bug watch added: tracker.nagios.org/ #206
http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=206
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594487
Title:
Filter in default lvm.conf breaks most lvm setups
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I cannot run the latest development release, since this is production
hardware. I'm only concerned with Lucid LTS,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715380
Title:
newer e10001 driver fix
Amending my comment #9. This appears to qualify as micro-version release
per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions
and thus needs to be approved by the technical board for the criteria.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
I agree that it makes more sense to go with 9.7.3 here. It's only a
"minor" upgrade and .0 releases are historically problematic anyway.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651875
Title:
B
What is the expected behaviour?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239022
Title:
Drag & drop an image from Firefox to Writer results in strange text
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Public bug reported:
Lucid comes with e1000e version 1.0.2-k2
This version has reported and actual problems on
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632650
http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=69
Having experie
Since intrepid is no longer supported, can this bug be changed invalid?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277329
Title:
upgrade from 0.6 [hardy] to 0.7 [intrepid beta] does not migrate
8.10 and 9.04 are both unsupported. Unless this problem can be verified
on a supported release it should be closed.
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
mdf@sushi ~ $ apt-cache policy imagemagick
imagemagick:
Installed: 7:6.6.2.6-1ubuntu1.1
Candidate: 7:6.6.2.6-1ubuntu1.1
Version table:
*** 7:6.6.2.6-1ubuntu1.1 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/main i386
Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/
** Attachment added: "zzzbad1.jpeg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704531/+attachment/1798205/+files/zzzbad1.jpeg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704531
Title:
certain jpeg cause
** Attachment added: "lsof.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/704531/+attachment/1798206/+files/lsof.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704531
Title:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: imagemagick
Something about the attached jpeg (zzzbad1.jpeg) causes imagemagick
(display, convert) to go bonkers. It creates a 4.1GB file in /tmp
/magick-
Try download the jpeg and run 'display zzzbad1.jpeg'
** Affects: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
Noting that, while the man page for scanpbnj DOES indicate it needs root
privileges to run, the error persists even with this simple incantation.
mfos...@sea-noc-002:~$ sudo scanpbnj -v
id: usersmfoster: No such user
Can't exec "error": No such file or directory at (eval 36) line 62.
Can't exec er
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: pbnj
scanpbnj seems broken from the get-go on lucid. It works for the root
user, but not a normal user.
mfos...@sea-noc-002:~$ scanpbnj
id: usersmfoster: No such user
Can't exec "error": No such file or directory at (eval 36) line 62.
Can't exec error: N
Noting that the original configuration shown looks like a problem. The
prio settings on the MASTER (machine3) are too low. In keepalived,
higher priority wins, so machine1 and machine3 are probably trying to
fight it out. I suggest the situation can be avoided by using state
MASTER on all three mac
(Adding advisory information from @RISK: The Consensus Security Vulnerability
Alert Vol. 9 No. 42)
(2) HIGH: Oracle Java Multiple Vulnerabilities
Affected:
JDK and JRE 6 Update 21 and earlier for Windows, Solaris, and Linux Java SE
JDK 5.0 Update 25 and earlier for Solaris Java SE
SDK 1.4.2_27 and
This looks pretty urgent/scary/important. Please expedite a fix.
Thanks.
--
Security Update for Sun Java JRE 6: Update 22
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659937
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: acroread
Adobe Reader and Acrobat Font Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Vulnerability Note VU#491991
Adobe Reader and Acrobat Font Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
>From http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/491991
CVE-ID(s): CVE-2010-2
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
[needs-packaging] xca
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152188
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
Please add depends for liblchown-perl, or adjust the rsnapshot.conf
defaults to link_dest 1 and cmd_cp /bin/cp as described earlier.
--
WARNING: Could not lchown() symlink "..."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340671
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
Just ran into this on lucid. Fixed by adding the link mentioned earlier...
ln -s ~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg ~/.gnupg/trustedkeys.gpg
--
debmirror fails to properly check Release(.gpg)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90546
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: "20100623a.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50811657/20100623a.png
--
installer display corruption on ASUS ASMB3-iKVM remote console
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
Using the Java remote console provided by ASUS ASMB3-iKVM unit.
It displays BIOS, POST and initial install screens fine, but once it gets into
the debian installer screens (red/blue) the display is all messed up. It comes
across as 648x
bitpus...@sea-vms2:~$ /usr/bin/qtconfig-qt4
QGtkStyle was unable to detect the current GTK+ theme.
Segmentation fault
However, xeyes works after installing x11-apps package.
Note that this is over a SSH forwarded session (using -Y argument to ssh)
--
segmentation fault from gui
https://bugs.laun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: puppet
See http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3155 and
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/versions/show/41
Please upgrade puppet to 0.25.5 which fixes a number of important bugs.
** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
Also, I went to add the URL as an upstream bug and it rejected the URL as
invalid
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3155
It seems the upstream bug tracker URL for puppet might be outdated now.
--
variable scope problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580611
You received this bug notificatio
** Attachment added: "core dump #1"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48350974/core.gz
--
segmentation fault from gui
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579663
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose
bitpus...@sea-vms2:~$ VirtualBox
Qt WARNING: QGtkStyle was unable to detect the current GTK+ theme.
(GUI appears, then upon clicking File->Preferences...)
Segmentation fault
1) The release of Ubuntu you are using, via 'lsb_release -rd' or
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47440811/Dependencies.txt
--
lmms crashes (segfault) on gui events
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: lmms
Using lmms with lucid and it is crashing on mouse actions.
1. when listening to sounds in the "My Presets"
2. when manipulating notes in the Piano Roll
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: lmms 0.4.5-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature:
** Changed in: lmms (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: lmms (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
--
lmms crashed with SIGSEGV in instrumentTrack::processOutEvent()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364439
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Changed in: lmms (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Blank tooltips
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561562
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists
t;> Since the configuration is almost unchanged
>>
> What has been modified?
>
Nothing - this message appears with the default configuration. I just
verified this.
>importance low
>status incomplete
>
>
--
+_+ Mark Foster - Sr. Systems Engineer
-|-
Filesystems used?
Are you doing it by hand or preseeding?
I just use the generic recipe from the README contained in the
partman-auto-raid and it works (as I described earlier, it bombed once
afterwards but was fine after that).
--
grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array
https://bugs.lau
Addendum to my last comment... after rebooting from busybox the system
did come up. So it looks as though the grub-install problem is fixed
here.
--
grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527401
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Following up on comments in 532729
Tried this (again) on Lucid Beta2 and it gets much further - the grub-install
step does not FAIL like it had before.
However on subsequent boot of the machine it brings up a busybox prompt
as shown in the attachment
** Attachment added: "20100409a.png"
http
Trying this on lucid beta2
With acpi=off kernel arg it boots up fine and I can install.
Without acpi=off it boots extremely sluggish and debinstaller is unusable.
In both cases, the VirtualBox settings have ACPI enabled.
--
Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
I have this problem also, under Lucid Beta1
--
No Video Output in Karmic with ID 046d:09a1 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Communicate
MP/S5500
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466935
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
** Attachment added: "20100326d.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107934/20100326d.png
--
Grub install fails to Raid1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
** Attachment added: "20100326c.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107799/20100326c.png
--
Grub install fails to Raid1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
** Attachment added: "20100326b.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107778/20100326b.png
--
Grub install fails to Raid1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
** Attachment added: "20100326a.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107732/20100326a.png
--
Grub install fails to Raid1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
** Attachment added: "syslog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107645/syslog.txt
--
Grub install fails to Raid1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
** Attachment added: "hardware-summary.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107566/hardware-summary.txt
--
Grub install fails to Raid1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
I ran into this also. Attaching screenshots and debug logs in case it
helps.
** Attachment added: "partman from debug logs"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42107518/partman.txt
--
Grub install fails to Raid1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532729
You received this bug notification because you a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: jfsutils
System crashed last night. Here is what I found in /var/log/syslog
^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^...@^@^..
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lucid-changes/2010-January/002491.html
I think this can be closed now.
--
[needs-packaging] xca
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152188
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
This is now included in upstream debian. Not sure how to get it included
in ubuntu (Lucid) or is that automatic?
--
[needs-packaging] xca
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152188
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
Public bug reported:
Please package sudosh2 for karmic and lucid.
(I plan to work on this).
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sudosh2
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mark Foster (fostermarkd)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee
Kudos for that last suggestion from Jan-Phillip Litza, it fix the issue
for me.
--
OpenVPN over Network-Manager very instable, often failes to connect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
After some time this problem has gone away, It was only after we
replaced 5 of the 12 disks and rebuild the system numerous times.
The disks were Seagate drives reporting ST3_INVALID_PFM on inquiry.
You can close this issue.
--
kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
htt
How about just modifying libapache2-mod-php5 to depend on apache2
instead of apache2-mpm-prefork?
--
PHP5 or PHP4 for apache2-mpm-worker
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12296
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Please let's get this into the next LTS release.
--
raid10 support should be added to installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139514
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
> Adding the openldap to the ssl-cert group by default is not an option
Please explain why.
Is it a technical reason or a policy reason?
Thanks.
--
dapper upgrade to hardy: openldap silently refuses to start when unable to open
SSL certificates - main: TLS init def ctx failed: -64 - openldap use
> Adding the openldap to the ssl-cert group by default is not an option
Please explain why.
Is it a technical reason or a policy reason?
Thanks.
--
dapper upgrade to hardy: openldap silently refuses to start when unable to open
SSL certificates - main: TLS init def ctx failed: -64 - openldap use
Changing sleep 1 to sleep 10 on line 111 is what "fixes" the problem for me.
Perhaps a TIMEOUT setting in /etc/defaults/mysql to set the timeout length
would be the proper fix here.
--
mysql initscript fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317734
You received this bug notification because you ar
wtf - almost two months and nobody has even triaged this?
--
kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283843
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
I respectfully disagree.
IMO they should not have "nagios3" or "nagios2" in the path names at all,
instead...
/etc/nagios/conf.d/contacts.cfg
/etc/nagios/conf.d/extinfo.cfg
This matches up with the paths from nagios-plugins and is the better
approach.
Nobody is going to feasibly run nagios2 & n
What is taking so long on the REVU process for this package.
--
[needs-packaging] xca
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152188
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
Sounds like a blow off. Where is this policy documented?
I don't see why a relatively minor upgrade from 8.0.11 to 8.0.13 would
not be warranted if this bug is verified.
--
DRBD 8.0.11 is unusably slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288226
You received this bug notification because you are a m
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18567526/lspci-vvnn.log
--
kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283843
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: "dmesg2.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18567513/dmesg2.log
--
kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283843
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18567510/dmesg.log
--
kernel BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283843
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
This keeps happening on our backup server which is running Ubuntu 8.04.1 LTS
Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.213472] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0
stuck for 11s! [jfsCommit:2338]
Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-backup-001 kernel: [514527.214360] CPU 0:
Oct 15 08:15:06 sea-back
I'm trying to pick this up where D. Mueller left off. xca-0.6.4-1 has
been uploaded to REVU.
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=xca
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Daniel Mueller (ubuntu-danm) => Mark Foster (fostermarkd)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Inval
Public bug reported:
Similar in nature to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/218899
Upon configuring a certificate and key for openldap to use (in
/etc/ssl/certs and /etc/ssl/private folders which are group-readable by
ssl-cert) the discovery was made that openldap user is no
Thank you, Oliver! That solves my need.
--
gnome-screensaver does not provide a xscreensaver-command replacement
https://launchpad.net/bugs/22121
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Please fix this issue. I need the functionality that xscreensaver-command
provided.
For example, my display locks up periodically... probably a bug in [g]rdesktop.
But I used to be able to "fix" it by running ALT-F2 and the command
"xscreensaver-command -activate"
--
gnome-screensaver does not
95 matches
Mail list logo
