Re: [Bug 2053243] Re: Confusing description of package

2024-02-26 Thread Marco Davids
Op 26-02-24 om 07:35 schreef Christian Ehrhardt : > I'd suggest that this would best be fixed in Debian (which has the same > problem) and automatically synced over to Ubuntu. > Hence I wanted to ask if you could please file a bug with Debian as well? > Thanks in advance! Yes, you are right. S

[Bug 2053243] Re: Confusing description of package

2024-02-26 Thread Marco Davids
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1064829 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064829 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053243 Title: Confusing description of pac

[Bug 1959825] Re: Can't upgrade linuxptp with chrony installed

2022-02-24 Thread Marco Davids
Details can be found here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002980 It says: * Change service file installation * Revert "debian/control: Provide 'time-daemon'" That is this one: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994293 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug t

[Bug 1959825] Re: Can't upgrade linuxptp with chrony installed

2022-02-24 Thread Marco Davids
Debian has published a fix in linuxptp_3.1.1-3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959825 Title: Can't upgrade linuxptp with chrony installed To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 1959825] Re: Can't upgrade linuxptp with chrony installed

2022-02-10 Thread Marco Davids
Workaround: Fetch the .deb from the repositatory and put it in a temporary place. Then do (as root): dpkg-deb -R linuxptp_3.1.1-2_amd64.deb tmp (edit DEBIAN/control, remove the 'Provides') mv linuxptp_3.1.1-2_amd64.deb linuxptp_3.1.1-2_amd64.deb_org dpkg-deb -b tmp linuxptp_3.1.1-2_amd64.deb

[Bug 1872564] Re: /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id rule missing from abstractions/nameservice

2020-05-27 Thread Marco Davids
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872564 Title: /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id rule missing from a

[Bug 1007326] [NEW] wrong dhcpv6 ports in 'after6.rules'

2012-06-01 Thread Marco Davids
Public bug reported: Could it be that 'after6.rules' has wrong ports for DHCPv6? Should they be like this? # don't log noisy services by default . . -A ufw6-after-input -p udp --dport 546 -j ufw6-skip-to-policy-input -A ufw6-after-input -p udp --dport 547 -j ufw6-skip-to-policy-input Instead o

[Bug 615320] Re: segmentation fault after 82 minus signs on a line

2011-01-18 Thread Marco Davids
Perhaps related to this; joe also crashes when I start in and paste the following string in it: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -S -M pc-0.12 -no-kvm -m 128 -smp 1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -name test2 -uuid 52610fb0-9d58-bc91-fbd6-e7506c2cc6b1 -nodefaults -chardev socket,id=monitor,path=/var/lib/li

[Bug 703514] Re: wrong ownership on /dev/kvm (Maverick)

2011-01-17 Thread Marco Davids
This is weird, can't reproduce it myself anymore either... I went back to an older version of qemu-kvm en re-installed the current one again, after that, the issue seems to have disappeared. Don't have a clue why. I do run into quite some other problems now, however They are related to thi

[Bug 703514] Re: wrong ownership on /dev/kvm (Maverick)

2011-01-16 Thread Marco Davids
Okay, the error came back... (can't go unnoticed, it was painfully slow again) open /dev/kvm: Permission denied Could not initialize KVM, will disable KVM support Turns out that the ownership is reset after 'qemu-kvm' is restarted. As a workaround I added 'chgrp kvm /dev/kvm' in the 'pre-start sc

[Bug 703514] [NEW] wrong ownership on /dev/kvm (Maverick)

2011-01-16 Thread Marco Davids
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm Installed qemu-kvm, but it was *very* slow (while using virt-manager). Looked in /var/log/libvirt/qemu/.log and noticed that user libvirt- qemu had no access to /dev/kvm (access denied error) and that it was unable to use the KVM full virtual

[Bug 694983] Re: udhcpd crashes with 'Illegal instruction'

2011-01-04 Thread Marco Davids
Running Lucid's udhcpd_0.9.8cvs20050303-3_i386.deb works as a temorary workaround. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694983 Title: udhcpd crashes with 'Illegal instruction' -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 694983] Re: udhcpd crashes with 'Illegal instruction'

2010-12-28 Thread Marco Davids
btw, kernel version is: Linux xs 2.6.35-24-generic-pae #42-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 2 03:21:31 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694983 Title: udhcpd crashes with 'Ille

[Bug 694983] [NEW] udhcpd crashes with 'Illegal instruction'

2010-12-28 Thread Marco Davids
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: busybox package: udhcpd 1:1.15.3-1ubuntu5 OS: Maverick 10.10 (server edition) When trying to run udhcp, it crashes with an SIGILL while reading the config file. Doing the same with an entire empty config-file will work, but as soon as saomething is ent