** Attachment added: "The /var/log/syslog entries when the machine is booted
with the Ethernet cable *in*"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/976138/+attachment/3066837/+files/var-log-syslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
** Attachment added: "The /var/log/samba/log.samba entries when the machine is
booted with the Ethernet cable *in*"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/976138/+attachment/3066825/+files/var-log-samba-log.samba
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
** Attachment added: "The /var/log/syslog entries when the machine is booted
with the Ethernet cable *out*"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/976138/+attachment/3066796/+files/var-log-syslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
** Attachment added: "The /var/log/samba/log.samba entries when the machine is
booted with the Ethernet cable *out*"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/976138/+attachment/3066792/+files/var-log-samba-log.samba
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
> Is there nothing listening on *any* port 88/UDP ? or is it just on a
different IP?
Nothing on port 88/UDP for any IP, if I'm understanding lsof correctly.
Likewise nothing on any port 389/UDP:
leo@blackbox:~$ sudo lsof | grep UDP
named 1114bind 512u IPv6 8584
> Am I missing something?
Indeed.
> Speaking of which, I have discovered that starting the server with the
Ethernet cable disconnected causes it to start with samba processes
listening on port 88 UDP (UDP Kerberos) and port 389 UDP (UDP LDAP):
When the server is started with the network cable pu
> Is 10.37.55.20 the wrong IP address? Is that not the host on which
Samba is installed?
It absolutely is: samba4, bind and kinit are all running on the same
server, whose IP address for eth0 is 10.37.55.20 . Again, during
installation the server was given the static IP settings address
10.37.55.2
** Attachment added: "wireshark_lo_20120412185250_bOb6dS"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/976138/+attachment/3061359/+files/wireshark_lo_20120412185250_bOb6dS
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
In comment #8,
> except for the bind4 package and its dependencies of course
should read "except for the samba4 package and its dependencies of
course"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9
> After install, the only changes which I made to BIND settings were to insert
> include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf";
> into /etc/bind/named.conf , and
> tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab";
> inside the options { [...] } brackets in /etc/bind/named.conf.options
Of cou
Jelmer,
Have you seen the libpcap files which I have attached? In particular,
the first eight packets of the lo capture made while kinit was run,
which I attached to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/976138/comments/4
comment #4?
1 0.00127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1DNS
I attempted to join a Windows 7 SP1 computer on the local network to the
domain known (locally) as irishtown.localonly.rvcomerford.ie , in the
manner shown in the first
http://www.samba.org/tridge/Samba4Demo/s4demo1.ogv of the Samba4 video
demonstrations http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/video
Sorry,
> this machine (currently assigned 10.37.55.20 by DHCP)
should read
> this machine (currently assigned 10.37.55.26 by DHCP)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976138
Title:
kerb
That fails:
leo@blackbox:~$ host -t TXT _kerberos.IRISHTOWN.LOCALONLY.RVCOMERFORD.IE
Host _kerberos.IRISHTOWN.LOCALONLY.RVCOMERFORD.IE not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
I've attached a pcap file for the loopback interface on blackbox. While
the capture was running I did
sudo kinit -V administra...@irishtow
("When I saw smbclient //localhost/netlogon -d 5 -Uadministrator fail
despite getting the correct password" should be "When I saw smbclient
//localhost/netlogon -Uadministrator fail despite getting the correct
password" - I didn't start using -d until after I started getting login
failures.)
--
Y
I'm using krb5-user. I've restored the default krb5.conf and then
rebooted, but the situation is as before:
leo@blackbox:~$ ls -l /etc/krb5.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 115 Apr 8 16:54 /etc/krb5.conf
leo@blackbox:~$ cat /etc/krb5.conf
[libdefaults]
default_realm = IRISHTOWN.LOCALONLY.RVCOM
Oh, if it's not a samba bug, then great! I should probably explain how I
got here, though, since I think I may not be the only person.
1) The password-nanny in provision (or whatever it's calling) is very
hard to satisfy, so instead of using a simple password for testing I
ended up omitting --admi
Public bug reported:
I am attempting to install Samba 4 for use as a primary domain
controller using version 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4 of samba4 on a new
install of Ubuntu Server 12.04 beta 2 for x86-64. Installing the samba4
package, or running /usr/share/samba/setup/provision at any other time,
does
Public bug reported:
I am attempting to install Samba 4 for use as a primary domain
controller using version 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4 of samba4 on a new
install of Ubuntu Server 12.04 beta 2 for x86-64. Problems show up when
using smbclient to test the samba4 installation, as suggested in the
officia
Just to add: one thing I have confirmed is that the test DNS requests
suggested by the Samba 4 HOWTO,
host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.samdom.example.com.
host -t SRV _kerberos._udp.samdom.example.com.
host -t A samba.samdom.example.com.
do succeed without /var/log/syslog warnings once the
/etc/apparmor.d/
Public bug reported:
I am attempting to install Samba 4 using version 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4
of samba4 on Ubuntu 12.04 beta 2 for x86-64. Installing the samba4
package, or running /usr/share/samba/setup/provision at any other time,
does not configure DNS for samba4, but it does generate an example
Public bug reported:
I am running an almost-newly-installed Ubuntu Server 12.04 beta 2.
Here's the output of ifconfig -a:
leo@blackbox:~$ ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr e0:cb:4e:ab:1e:dc
inet addr:10.37.55.20 Bcast:10.37.55.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 add
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
On 10.4.1, 10.10 beta and 10.10 dailies up to at least 6 October, the
Debian installer fails to detect a four-disk dmraid RAID5 on an ASUS
M4N78 Pro motherboard (BIOS v. 1205). Neither the RAID itself nor the
component driv
Logs from failed installation as above, this time using Ubuntu 10.4.1
and two separate mirrored pairs (with no additional disks).
** Attachment added: "10.4.1 2 x RAID1.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/656683/+attachment/1678342/+files/10.4.1%202%20x%20RAID1
Logs from failed installation as above, this time using Ubuntu 10.4.1
and the four-disk RAID5 setup (without additional disks).
** Attachment added: "10.4.1 RAID5.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/656683/+attachment/1678341/+files/10.4.1%20RAID5.zip
--
nVid
Logs from failed installation as above, this time using the Ubuntu 10.10
daily from 19 September and the four-disk RAID5 setup (with no
additional disks).
** Attachment added: "19 sep 10.10 beta RAID5.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/656683/+attachment/16783
** Attachment added: "Logs from failed installation as above, this time using
the final 10.10 daily from 6 October and a four-disk RAID5 setup (plus one
non-RAIDed disk)."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656683/+attachment/1678339/+files/6%20oct%202%20beta%20RAID5.zip
--
nVidia dmraid RAID
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
On 10.4.1, 10.10 beta and 10.10 dailies up to at least 6 October, the
Debian installer fails to detect a four-disk dmraid RAID5 on an ASUS
M4N78 Pro motherboard (BIOS v. 1205). Neither the RAID itself nor the
component drives appear on th
You're right, it's pretty clearly not related to grub. My apologies.
--
grub does not detect partitions properly on DMRAID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634840
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
Logs from failed installation as above, this time using Ubuntu 10.4.1
and two separate mirrored pairs.
** Attachment added: "10.4.1 2 x RAID1.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/634840/+attachment/1625174/+files/10.4.1%202%20x%20RAID1.zip
--
grub does not detect partiti
Logs from failed installation as above, this time using the Ubuntu 10.10
daily from 22 September and the four-disk RAID5 setup.
** Attachment added: "22 sep beta RAID5.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/634840/+attachment/1625151/+files/22%20sep%20beta%20RAID5.zip
--
g
Logs from failed installation as above, this time using the Ubuntu 10.10
daily from 19 September and the four-disk RAID5 setup.
** Attachment added: "19 sep 10.10 beta RAID5.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/634840/+attachment/1625150/+files/19%20sep%2010.10%20beta%20RA
Logs from failed installation as above, this time using Ubuntu 10.4.1
and the four-disk RAID5 setup.
** Attachment added: "10.4.1 RAID5.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/634840/+attachment/1625147/+files/10.4.1%20RAID5.zip
--
grub does not detect partitions properly o
I encounter apparently the same problem when trying to perform a fresh
install either of 10.4.1 or of 10.10 beta. The Debian installer fails to
detect a four-disk RAID5 on an ASUS M4N78 Pro motherboard (BIOS v.
1205). (The disks in the RAID5 do not show up individually and no other
HDDs are install
Installing the missing sound modules as described at
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SoundTroubleshooting has restored
sound. I still don't know why the 8.10 kernel didn't install these at
upgrade time.
--
Audio (SB Audigy, nForce 2 integrated, USB device) not detected after 8.04 ->
8.10 upgra
** Tags removed: alsa pulseaudio
--
Audio (SB Audigy, nForce 2 integrated, USB device) not detected after 8.04 ->
8.10 upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291389
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
** Tags added: alsa
--
Audio (SB Audigy, nForce 2 integrated, USB device) not detected after 8.04 ->
8.10 upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291389
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
This line is added to the pulseaudio -vv output whenever an application
(Amarok, MPlayer, Beep) fails to play audio:
D: sink-input.c: Assertion 'data->sink' failed at pulsecore/sink-
input.c:110, function pa_sink_input_new.
--
Audio (SB Audigy, nForce 2 integrated, USB device) not detected after
** Tags added: pulseaudio
--
Audio (SB Audigy, nForce 2 integrated, USB device) not detected after 8.04 ->
8.10 upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291389
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On foot of the troubleshooting advice at
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=789578 , here is the output of
aplay -l on my system:
aplay: device_list:215: no soundcards found...
while the output of pkill pulseaudio; sleep 2; pulseaudio -vv is
attached. pavucontrol shows no devices of any kin
Here is the output of pulseaudio --dump-conf .
The problem seem to have something to do with
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5956390#post5956390 . I get the
same error from pulseaudio --version that ShirishAg75 reported in that
thread, and my .xsession-errors contains the following:
ALS
** Attachment added: "haldump"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19106104/haldump
--
Audio (SB Audigy, nForce 2 integrated, USB device) not detected after 8.04 ->
8.10 upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291389
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
I have a Soundblaster Audigy PCI card on an nForce 2 motherboard. Before
the upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10 I was using the Audigy's sound output with
no problems. Upon upgrading to 8.10 I found the following:
* There is no playback of music or sound effects from the Audigy, the
U
Public bug reported:
When installing mzscheme, there is an option to activate the PLT web
server. When this option is not selected, mzscheme installs cleanly and
can be cleanly uninstalled again (when slib is not installed - see bug
#38936). When the option is selected, installation produces this
44 matches
Mail list logo
