I've tried boot-repair and many other solutions, but I was always
getting an error that boot/efi directory was not found. Finally I tried
disabling the UEFI mode and it worked like a charm. I don't know why
I've never seen anyone mention to disable this, instead I just found
more discription of how
I tried to use boot-repair, but it's giving the error efi directory not
found. I tried fresh download and also tried multiple times by trying to
format a partition in the front of the disk, every time some booting
problem occurs, but boot-repair used to work.
--
You received this bug notification
** Summary changed:
- Installation failed, it crashed while boot loader was being installed
+ Ubuntu installation failed, it crashed while boot loader was being installed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Public bug reported:
I was installing Ubuntu 18.04 which I recently downloaded. The
installation failed when grub was being installed or something.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubiquity 18.04.14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17
Uname: Linux 4.15.0
Public bug reported:
the install wa snot complete
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: guacamole-tomcat (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-83.106-generic 4.4.70
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-83-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.9
AptOrdering:
tomcat8: Config
Hi,
There seems to be something special about the .iso.
The startup disk creator won't select the file for creating a bootable USB.
In any case, how would application level variation be caused because of
things in the BIOS?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Hi,
Couple of more updates.
1. I tried booting from USB stick of the daily build. But in that case, the
entire thing works so slow it is difficult to figure out where the delay is.
2. Sometimes there is flickering of the mouse cursor in the primary display
(only when the secondary display is a
Hi,
My apologies but I am not finding the time to download and run things on the
daily builds.
I wanted to add a detail from my use of the secondary display.
The amount of delay depends on which application has it's window open in
the secondary display. Nautilus has a much larger delay than Ch
Hi Christopher,
My apologies in the delay in getting back to you. I probably missed the email
notification.
I have created a new bug report and subscribed you to the same.
Thanks..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Public bug reported:
When attaching a secondary display, any activity on the second display
is displayed after a lag. This includes, typing, cursor movement, or
anything else.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-29.53-gener
Sorry. Forgot the second card.
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor
Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 21f5
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 46
Memory at f140 (64-bit,
Yes. This bug still exists. I am experiencing the same issue.
Ubuntu 14.04
ThinkPad W530
One external monitor.
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK107GLM [Quadro K1000M]
(rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 21f5
Flags: bus master,
I think it's being refreshed, when I add files on desktop they are
disappearing and reappearing (like it always happened) don't know why
cpu usage is not increasing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
Actually in older versions the cpu usage % would increase as we
continuously refresh using F5, and the icons or the mouse pointer would
show loading symbol, but in 13.04 mouse is not showing the loading
symbol and not only that the cpu % in conky or multiload indicator are
not showing increase in c
and it happens with 11.10 i386 as well. looks like it works fine with
hardy -
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
I'm seeing the same issue on 12.04 i386.
I tried patching dhclient-script as jaiber-john did but couldn't succeed. would
you mind sharing the diff please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Opened Bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-
efi/+bug/811485 for EFISYS 100 MiB size and FAT32 issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769669
Title:
Installer sh
Related bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-
efi/+bug/769669
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811485
Title:
EFI SYSTEM PARTITION should be atleast 100 MiB size and f
Public bug reported:
Create a EFI SYSTEM PARTITION of minimum 100 MiB size (200 MiB
recomended). Also partman-efi should use FAT32 instead of FAT16 for EFI
SYSTEM PARTITION as mandated by the UEFI 2.3.1 Spec. FAT16 ESP partition
is not recognised by Windows 7 UEFI bootloader because of this.
The
I will file a bug report for FAT32 vs FAt16. But I do not use Ubuntu
directly and modified this bug report only becuase few users reported
problems in dual-bot scenario when using FAT16 EFISYS which were solved
if FAT32 EFISYS was used.
BTW NTFS is not supposed to be the FS for EFISYS partition. A
It seems like Windows Vista x64 is ok with FAT16 in EFISYS but Windows 7
x64 setup uses FAT32 alone. I don't know whether this FAT32 requirement
for non-removable disk EFISYS is in UEFI 2.3 spec only or whether it was
the case in previous spec versions as well.
--
You received this bug notificati
Also the installer should use FAT32 instead of FAT16 for EFI SYSTEM
PARTITION as mandated by the UEFI Spec. FAT16 ESP partition is not
recognised by Windows UEFI bootloader because of this.
The below quote is copied form the UEFI Specification 2.3.1 - Chapter
12.3 File System Format.
[QUOTE]
EFI
This bug has been corrected in GNU Parted GIT repository
http://git.debian.org/?p=parted/parted.git (as on 25th September 2009).
--
"msftres" flag bug in GNU Parted while using GPT disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397386
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Will end users see the Extensible Firmware Interface System Partition,
Microsoft Reserved Partition, and OEM-specific partitions?
The user won't see these partitions exposed in Windows Explorer, nor is
any recognized file system exposed to legacy programs such as Context
Indexing. The Extensible F
What is a Microsoft Reserved Partition?
The Microsoft Reserved Partition reserves space on each disk drive for
subsequent use by operating system software. GUID Partition Table disks
do not allow hidden sectors. Software components that formerly used
hidden sectors now allocate portions of the Mic
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: parted
Please correct the "msftres" flag bug in libparted by deleting the
following code from (parted-source-dir)/libparted/labels/gpt.c :-
if (strncmp (fs_type->name, "fat", 3) == 0
|| strcmp (fs_type->name, "ntfs") == 0) {
gpt_part_data->type = PARTITI
** Description changed:
GPT fdisk (or gdisk) is a fdisk like program for managing GUID Partition
Table commonly used in EFI/UEFI based systems like Intel Macs, HP EliteBooks
etc.
It includes features like converting a
MBR disk to a GPT disk without loss
Public bug reported:
GPT fdisk (or gdisk) is a fdisk like program for managing GUID Partition Table
commonly used in EFI/UEFI based systems like Intel Macs, HP EliteBooks etc.
It includes features like converting a MBR
disk to a GPT disk without loss of data,
28 matches
Mail list logo
