[Bug 888703] Re: [320-1020m, IDT 92HD91BXX, Speaker, Front] Playback problem

2011-11-10 Thread John Schofield
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888703 Title: [320-1020m, IDT 92HD91BXX, Speaker, Front] Playback problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt

[Bug 888703] [NEW] [320-1020m, IDT 92HD91BXX, Speaker, Front] Playback problem

2011-11-10 Thread John Schofield
Public bug reported: This is an HP TouchSmart 320, model number 320-1200m. Sound to headphone jack works properly, but sound to built-in speakers does not work. I have installed Windows, and with Windows 7 installed, all audio hardware works properly, so this isn't a hardware fault. I've looked

[Bug 297735] [NEW] imapsync dependency not listed as dependency

2008-11-13 Thread John Schofield
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: imapsync This is in imapsync 1.241-1ubuntu1, installed on Ubuntu 8.04.1. If you use the --syncinternaldates option to imapsync, it reports the following error: + Copying msg #1799:5906 to folder INBOX Can't locate Date/Manip.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /

[Bug 243630] Re: Hardy release files contain invalid SHA256 signatures.

2008-06-27 Thread John Schofield
I tested this out to confirm Ryan's findings: I downloaded http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy/Release and http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy/main/binary- amd64/Packages.gz "md5sum Packages.gz" matches the md5sum data in the Release file. "sha256sum Packages.gz" does NOT match.

[Bug 243630] Re: Hardy release files contain invalid SHA256 signatures.

2008-06-27 Thread John Schofield
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Confirmed -- Hardy release files contain invalid SHA256 signatures. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bu

[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(>= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty

2008-03-07 Thread John Schofield
I don't want to step on any toes, so I want to be clear that I'm not part of the pbuilder packaging team, or any other team -- I'm just a user who is very interested in using pbuilder-uml, which depends on rootstrap. I might be able to help if the lack of a maintainer is the problem. However, base

[Bug 187961] Re: package bzip2-doc failed to install: confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file

2008-02-01 Thread John Schofield
** Attachment added: "sources.list" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11693628/sources.list -- package bzip2-doc failed to install: confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 187961] Re: package bzip2-doc failed to install: confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file

2008-02-01 Thread John Schofield
** Attachment added: "bzip2-doc.0.crash" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11693624/bzip2-doc.0.crash -- package bzip2-doc failed to install: confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 187961] Re: package bzip2-doc failed to install: confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file

2008-02-01 Thread John Schofield
I believe this is not related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzip2/+bug/187946 , despite the comment posted there -- this appears to be two different root causes. However, upon looking at the attached log file, it looks like case https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzip2/+bug/1

[Bug 187946] Re: package bzip2-doc 1.0.4-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

2008-02-01 Thread John Schofield
This bug should not be filed against apport-package -- I've run into the same issue, and filed a bug on bzip2-doc: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzip2/+bug/187961 -- package bzip2-doc 1.0.4-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187946 You received this b

[Bug 187961] [NEW] package bzip2-doc failed to install: confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file

2008-02-01 Thread John Schofield
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bzip2-doc Setting up bzip2-doc (1.0.4-2ubuntu1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/bzip2.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/bzip2.info): unabl

[Bug 187959] Re: package python-setuptools 0.6c7-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2008-01-31 Thread John Schofield
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11693338/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11693339/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package python-setuptools 0.6c7-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation

[Bug 187959] [NEW] package python-setuptools 0.6c7-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2008-01-31 Thread John Schofield
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-setuptools WHAT I DID: Upgraded from hardy --> hardy via "aptitude update && aptitude full-upgrade". WHAT I EXPECTED TO HAPPEN: All software to update without error. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED: QUOTE BEGINS Setting up python-setuptools (0.6c7-1) ...

[Bug 187959] Re: package python-setuptools 0.6c7-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2008-01-31 Thread John Schofield
** Attachment added: "sources.list" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11693361/sources.list -- package python-setuptools 0.6c7-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187959 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 187959] Re: package python-setuptools 0.6c7-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2008-01-31 Thread John Schofield
Also uploading a crash file attributed to python-opengl which appears to have the same root cause. ** Attachment added: "python-opengl.0.crash" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11693398/python-opengl.0.crash -- package python-setuptools 0.6c7-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-install

[Bug 130640] Re: Please sync rootstrap (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2008-01-30 Thread John Schofield
Not including rootstrap means that pbuilder-uml can never be useful. If rootstrap will not be included in Ubuntu, this case: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/+bug/106949 should probably be resolved by removing pbuilder-uml from Ubuntu, as it can't work without rootstrap. (Note

[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(>= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty

2008-01-30 Thread John Schofield
Does anyone know why rootstrap isn't available in Ubuntu? There's a bug requesting that it be pulled in from Debian, but the request was rejected. Without rewriting pbuilder-uml, adding rootstrap back to Ubuntu seems like the best way of resolving this. -- pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on r

[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(>= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty

2007-12-14 Thread John Schofield
This appears to be related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rootstrap/+bug/130640 That bug refers to Ubuntu's refusal to install rootstrap (for reasons that aren't entirely clear from the refusal). Either putting rootstrap back in the repository or removing the rootstrap dependency fr

[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(>= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty

2007-12-13 Thread John Schofield
Or not. I just updated my sources.list to Hardy, and was unable to install pbuilder-uml because of the missing rootstrap dependency. -- pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(>= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106949 You

[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(>= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty

2007-12-13 Thread John Schofield
And looks like it's fixed in Hardy. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/ "Remove rootstrap build-dependency." -- pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(>= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106949 You received t

[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(>= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty

2007-12-13 Thread John Schofield
I can confirm the problem remains in Gutsy. --TERMINAL CAPTURE STARTS-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install pbuilder-uml Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have reques