[Bug 1577923] Re: NM editor doesn't edit network details

2016-05-04 Thread Jochen Gruse
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1569674 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569674 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #1569674, which already has a reference to an upstream bug fix. Jochen ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1569674 [Kubuntu] Fail to connect to wifi after

[Bug 1574826] Re: Kubuntu 16.04 LTS network connection (VPN, and WPA2 WLAN) fails: "connection.gateway-ping-timeout: cannot set property: value of "###" of type 'guint' is invalid or out of range for

2016-05-04 Thread Jochen Gruse
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1569674 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569674 This too is a duplicate of bug #1569674, which already links to an upstream bug fix. Jochen ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1569674 [Kubuntu] Fail to connect to wifi after a recent update

[Bug 1569674] Re: [Kubuntu] Fail to connect to wifi after a recent update

2016-04-29 Thread Jochen Gruse
This bug affects me too. Bug #1571658 seems to be a duplicate of this bug, so there are even more people affected by this bug. Please fix soonish! B^) Regards, Jochen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1571658] Re: Can't save openvpn connection (connection.gateway-ping-timeout: can not set property value 37892016)

2016-04-29 Thread Jochen Gruse
Hi there, the problem is even worse. Even the simplest network connections fail most of the time, as the value to be set for connection.gateway-ping- timeout varies randomly. Steps to reproduce the problem (almost) consistently on Kubuntu Xenial are: # Right-click systray/Networks # Click Config

[Bug 1571658] Re: Can't save openvpn connection (connection.gateway-ping-timeout: can not set property value 37892016)

2016-04-29 Thread Jochen Gruse
I've just found bug #1569674, which already has a link to an fixed bug in upstream. This bug seems to be a duplicate. Jochen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571658 Title: Can't save

[Bug 647471] Re: gobi-loader does not start at boot via udev

2012-02-27 Thread Jochen Gruse
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 686418 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686418 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 686418 modemmanager prevents Gobi 2000 firmware loading -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successful installation (Alternate)

2011-10-18 Thread Jochen Gruse
Sigh. I know this is a "little" late, but for what it's worth: This bug is definitely fixed. My two T410 and the virtual machine install GRUB2 without any errors. Thanks a lot, Colin! Should you ever visit the west of Germany (Aachen), send me a mail and I'll thank you with a dinner & beer! Jochen

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successful installation (Alternate)

2011-09-29 Thread Jochen Gruse
Thanks, that's great news! When the fix is reviewed and included, I'll test the installer again in VirtualBox and then - if successful - on actual hardware. Of course I'll report my results here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successful installation (Alternate)

2011-09-27 Thread Jochen Gruse
** Attachment added: "partman" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/851704/+attachment/2468706/+files/partman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851704 Title:

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successful installation (Alternate)

2011-09-27 Thread Jochen Gruse
** Attachment added: "syslog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/851704/+attachment/2468708/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851704 Title: G

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successful installation (Alternate)

2011-09-27 Thread Jochen Gruse
I'm afraid I can't report any success. I'm using Kubuntu Oneiric amd64 alternate daily ISO, timestamp "27-Sep-2011 05:23". The error is (at least from my point of view) exactly the same: GRUB installs, updates, then error message from the installer. If I continue the installation "without boot load

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successfull installation (Alternate)

2011-09-20 Thread Jochen Gruse
Please note: As you'll see from the logs, I tested this with a VirtualBox image, but the bug is occurs on actual hardware too. I have two T410 thinkpads with this configuration, both got a parallel installation (Natty beside already existing Maverick) by using cryptsetup and lvchange by hand before

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-16 Thread Jochen Gruse
Opened bug 851704 for the GRUB problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420080 Title: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successfull installation (Alternate)

2011-09-16 Thread Jochen Gruse
** Attachment added: "partman log of Oneiric installation" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/851704/+attachment/2411900/+files/partman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successfull installation (Alternate)

2011-09-16 Thread Jochen Gruse
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of partitioning layout" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/851704/+attachment/2411902/+files/partitions.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 851704] Re: GRUB reports error after successfull installation (Alternate)

2011-09-16 Thread Jochen Gruse
** Attachment added: "syslog of Oneiric installation" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/851704/+attachment/2411901/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 851704] [NEW] GRUB reports error after successfull installation (Alternate)

2011-09-16 Thread Jochen Gruse
Public bug reported: I'm using Kubuntu Oneiric Daily amd64 alternate iso for installation, date of 15. Sep. Partitioning setup is complex: /dev/sda1 -> /boot for Kubuntu 11.04 /dev/sda2 -> /boot for (to be installed) Kubuntu 11.10 /dev/sda3 -> Extended partition /dev/sda5 -> Crypto partition (LU

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-15 Thread Jochen Gruse
Sorry for the delay, but you'll get a success as an excuse! B^) Tried Kubuntu Oneiric alternate amd64 daily, Timestamp "15-Sep-2011 05:23". Partitioner works great, Oneiric installs, reboots and runs, /etc/fstab and /etc/crypttab are correct. Two points I'd like to address: * /etc/fstab uses "/de

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-13 Thread Jochen Gruse
Ah well, crossed mails explain it... B^) Downloaded the current daily build (Kubuntu oneriric amd64, Timestamp "13-Sep-2011 05:20", size below 700MB, yay!). Partitioner working as expected, but still "No installable kernel found". A check from a shell shows already populated file systems below /t

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-12 Thread Jochen Gruse
Hmmm?!? There's no newer image available. I downloaded oneiric- alternate-amd64.iso from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily/current/, the Ubuntu oneiric images are even older. Some timezone problems? Well, doesn't really matter. I'll download the new nightly build tomorrow morning and try tha

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-12 Thread Jochen Gruse
There's still a problem. While installing the base system, no installable kernel was found in the configured APT sources. I've included the syslog as before. ** Attachment added: "syslog of installer run, no bootable kernel found" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/partman-crypto/+bug/4

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-12 Thread Jochen Gruse
Alright, the images with timestamp "12-Sep-2011 09:59" are OK! Right now the installation is running. Crypto partition was found, activated, contained LVM PV found, LVM activated. Great! I'll report back when the installation is done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-12 Thread Jochen Gruse
Hmm, I downloaded the image this morning. Well, I'll try again, just a mo'... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420080 Title: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data To manag

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-12 Thread Jochen Gruse
The last lines in the above syslog at the time that the installer says "No kernel modules were found" are Sep 12 09:53:49 cdrom-retriever: warning: File /cdrom/dists/oneiric/main/debian-installer/binary-amd64/Packages does not exist. Sep 12 09:53:49 cdrom-retriever: warning: File /cdrom/dists/on

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-12 Thread Jochen Gruse
** Attachment added: "syslog during alternate installer run" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/partman-crypto/+bug/420080/+attachment/2390641/+files/syslog.kub1110 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-09-12 Thread Jochen Gruse
Hi Colin, thanks for your work on this! Unfortunately, there's a problem with the nightly alternate Kubuntu oneiric images (installer can't load kernel modules), so I can only report that yes, the "Activate existing volumes" option is there and asks for the passphrase to the existing crypto partit

[Bug 285890] Re: Does not show encrypted partition

2011-02-28 Thread Jochen Gruse
Thanks for your notes and the link! Your way is certainly easier as it lets you circumvent the command line for the most part - with the exception of restoring /etc/crypttab, perhaps? On the other hand, doing it my way gets you acquainted with the basic commands for crypted partitions, LVM, initram

[Bug 420080] Re: Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data

2011-02-25 Thread Jochen Gruse
I wish I had found this bug report sooner... Please take a look at my workaround in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/285890 Quietly reinitializing the crypt partition is a release critical bug, IMHO. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 285890] Re: Does not show encrypted partition

2011-02-25 Thread Jochen Gruse
Just as an aside: Personally, I think this is a release critical bug. First, I don't like updating my OS in place, even as Ubuntu/Debian make this as painless as possible. Sometimes, an update still goofs. Second, I like to test alpha versions of Ubuntu (Kubuntu, actually) on my physical hardware i

[Bug 285890] Re: Does not show encrypted partition

2011-02-25 Thread Jochen Gruse
Please note: The above workaround is not complete. After setting up your filesystems and mount points, installation continues, but GRUB2 installation fails. After choosing "Continue without installing bootloader", system reboots and GRUB2 comes up, but booting the new Natty installation drops into

[Bug 285890] Re: Does not show encrypted partition

2011-02-25 Thread Jochen Gruse
** Attachment added: "Snapshot of installer seeing the almost correct disk layout." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/285890/+attachment/1870380/+files/cryptpart-almostright.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 285890] Re: Does not show encrypted partition

2011-02-25 Thread Jochen Gruse
@Colin Watson: Your tip works only halfway. Setting up the partition as "physical volume for encryption" makes it visible to the installer as an encrypted partiton, then going into "Configure encrypted volumes" and choosing "Finish" asks for the passphrase. The problems start there... The passphr

[Bug 621743] Re: Kernel 2.6.35-17 breaks gobi_loader

2010-12-21 Thread Jochen Gruse
@J Boyan: Please try a cold boot, then enter lsusb | grep 05c6:9204 Getting a result means that your modem is still uninitialized, as you know by now... Then do a lsmod | grep qcserial The number in the third column *should* be 0, but it's probably 1, which means that some process open

[Bug 490194] Re: /sbin/modemmanager is too aggressive managing devices that aren't known to be modems

2010-12-16 Thread Jochen Gruse
I concur, modemmanager is far too aggressive. Please take a look at these bugs, too: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/686418 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gobi-loader/+bug/621743 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gobi-loader/+bug/647471 gobi-loader i

[Bug 647471] Re: gobi-loader does not start at boot via udev

2010-12-15 Thread Jochen Gruse
Please have a look at the solution in this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/686418 The solution blocks modemmanager to access the QDL device (for firmware loading). If modemmanager accesses /dev/ttyUSB0 while gobi-loader still runs, it corrupts the firmware load and

[Bug 621743] Re: Kernel 2.6.35-17 breaks gobi_loader

2010-12-15 Thread Jochen Gruse
Alright! Glad to have helped. I believe that the bug depends on timing issues. Either gobi-loader became slower (bigger firmware?) or modemmanager starts faster, so that they both try to write to /dev/ttyUSB0 at the same time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 686418] Re: modemmanager prevents Gobi 2000 firmware loading

2010-12-15 Thread Jochen Gruse
The attached file was generated out of the maverick kernel sources qcserial.c. It lists all known QDL devices (for firmware loading) in udev usb-blacklist format. These lines should be added to "/lib/udev/rules.d/77-mm-usb-device-blacklist.rules". ** Attachment added: "modemmanager blacklist entri

[Bug 686418] Re: modemmanager prevents Gobi 2000 firmware loading

2010-12-07 Thread Jochen Gruse
Output of "dpkg-query -W modemmanager network-manager": modemmanager0.4+git.20100809t153145.be28089-0ubuntu1 network-manager 0.8.1+git.20100810t184654.ab580f4-0ubuntu2 These are the up-to-date packages from the official repositories, no ppa's or third party repositories added. -- You receiv

[Bug 621743] Re: Kernel 2.6.35-17 breaks gobi_loader

2010-12-07 Thread Jochen Gruse
You might want to take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/686418 For the initial bug reporter, the corresponding line in file "/lib/udev/rules.d/77-mm-usb-device-blacklist.rules" would be ATTRS{idVendor}=="03f0", ATTRS{idProduct}=="241d", ENV{ID_MM_DEVICE_IGNO

[Bug 686418] Re: modemmanager prevents Gobi 2000 firmware loading

2010-12-07 Thread Jochen Gruse
Output of "uname -a": Linux thinky 2.6.35-23-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 11:55:36 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Output of "lsb-release -a": No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 Codename: maverick -- You received this bug

[Bug 554099] Re: Qualcomm Gobi 2000 3G (gobi_loader/qcserial) broken

2010-12-07 Thread Jochen Gruse
Short version: Add the line ATTRS{idVendor}=="05c6", ATTRS{idProduct}=="9204", ENV{ID_MM_DEVICE_IGNORE}="1" to the file "/lib/udev/rules.d/77-mm-usb-device-blacklist.rules", then reboot. This should prevent the modem-manager from corrupting the firmw

[Bug 686418] [NEW] modemmanager prevents Gobi 2000 firmware loading

2010-12-07 Thread Jochen Gruse
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: modemmanager System the bug occurs on: Lenovo T410 2522 2VG with Qualcomm Gobi 2000 UMTS modem with Kubuntu 10.10 Maverick/amd64 Problem description: The Qualcomm Gobi 2000 modem needs to get its firmware loaded before it can be used. Without firmware