Re: [Bug 1176498] Re: friends app crashes on start.

2013-08-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/05/2013 02:24 PM, Robert Bruce Park wrote: > Yes, you can clear all Friends data and start fresh. First, you have to > get it out of memory: > > killall friends-dispatcher friends-service friends-app > > Then you have to delete it's files: > > rm -rf ~/.cache/friends > ~/.local/sha

Re: [Bug 1176498] Re: friends app crashes on start.

2013-08-05 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/05/2013 11:44 AM, Jeff Licquia wrote: > Of these, the XBMC and Wine PPAs seem like the most likely sources of > problems. I'll try getting rid of those. The LSB stuff is also easy > for me to get rid of, in case there's some odd thing going on there. I've purged

Re: [Bug 1176498] Re: friends app crashes on start.

2013-08-05 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/03/2013 10:36 AM, Robert Bruce Park wrote: > Jeff, can you uninstall any custom PPAs or custom-compiled binaries you > might have, and just use the stock distro packages? Also, are you using > raring or saucy? I'm running raring. Here's a list of external archives I run: - Dropbox - Goo

[Bug 1176498] Re: friends app crashes on start.

2013-06-30 Thread Jeff Licquia
account: id 4, enabled, provider: google account: id 3, enabled, provider: twitter account: id 2, enabled, provider: identica account: id 1, enabled, provider: facebook I've turned off linkage to the identica account due to the impending conversion to pump.io, and of course google isn't connected

[Bug 1176498] Re: friends app crashes on start.

2013-06-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
Checking out lp:friends-app on my system, I'm able to reproduce the crash exactly with a local build ("debian/rules binary" followed by running src/friends-app). The crash reliably reproduces itself with revisions 69 through 72. On revision 73, I get the following output in the terminal: virtual

[Bug 1176498] Re: friends app crashes on start.

2013-06-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
According to Launchpad, friends-app is the same version on both raring and saucy (0.90.0bzr13.04.17-0ubuntu1). Is there some other version we should be aware of? I was able to reproduce the traceback in the gdb trace attached above. I've also attached friends.log after deleting the old one, killi

[Bug 1171745] Re: Timeline doesn't refresh

2013-06-05 Thread Jeff Licquia
Added a little debugging logic on my own, and watching the logs. One factor that seems to be present: multiple refresh threads per service running at once. Apparently, Facebook and Twitter start refreshes, and then in the middle of the refresh two more refresh threads get started. After that, all

[Bug 1171745] Re: Timeline doesn't refresh

2013-06-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
And I can confirm that killing friends-dispatcher by itself (while keeping friends-app and friends-service running) seems to kick the update process loose, at least for a while. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 1171745] Re: Timeline doesn't refresh

2013-06-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
On a hunch, disabled identi.ca support. (It'll have to happen anyway with the pump.io conversion.) That made the exception go away, but didn't fix the problem with updates stopping after a time. Looking at the most recent debug log, I stopped friends-app (via the close button), and killed the di

[Bug 1171745] Re: Timeline doesn't refresh

2013-06-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
I'm experiencing the same problem. I took the steps in comment #1, and have attached my log. In particular, this looks interesting: DEBUG Thread-29 2013-06-03 14:11:57,015 friends.utils.base Identica.receive has completed in 0.05s, thread exiting. ERROR Thread-30 2013-06-03 14:11:57,020

[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-10-11 Thread Jeff Licquia
For the record, #lsb is not as unanimous as has been implied. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640 Title: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code To manage notifications ab

[Bug 983583] Re: NM indicator does not show VPN submenu on login

2012-07-24 Thread Jeff Licquia
Clayton's screenshot is pretty much exactly what I see. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983583 Title: NM indicator does not show VPN submenu on login To manage notifications about thi

[Bug 1013746] Re: nm-applet side menus stop working

2012-06-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013746 Title: nm-applet side menus stop working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager

[Bug 1013746] [NEW] nm-applet side menus stop working

2012-06-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
Public bug reported: The Network Manager applet shows side menus for "More networks" and "VPN Connections". On occasion, the applet loses the ability to display those options usefully. When in this state, mousing over those menu options causes an empty menu to show up instead of the extra wirele

[Bug 917314] Re: gmtp crashed with SIGSEGV in deviceConnect()

2012-05-30 Thread Jeff Licquia
Bug 968798 looks like a dup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917314 Title: gmtp crashed with SIGSEGV in deviceConnect() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.laun

[Bug 994575] Re: dnsmasq does not update nameserver info after network change

2012-05-04 Thread Jeff Licquia
After doing a bit of research, I found that dnsmasq usage is controlled via the "dns=dnsmasq" line in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf. I commented out this line and restarted, and can confirm that this fixed my problems with DNS resolution on the VPN. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 994575] Re: dnsmasq does not update nameserver info after network change

2012-05-04 Thread Jeff Licquia
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994575 Title: dnsmasq does not update nameserver info after network change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun

[Bug 994575] [NEW] dnsmasq does not update nameserver info after network change

2012-05-04 Thread Jeff Licquia
Public bug reported: I have a VPN set up in Network Manager, which worked well when my system was running 11.10. After upgrading to 12.04, I've noticed that DNS changes needed by the VPN aren't happening. Hosts that only resolve within the VPN won't resolve, and hosts that are supposed to resolv

[Bug 979080] Re: ubuntuone-syncdaemon crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ubuntuone-storage-protocol/ubuntuone/storageprotocol/protocol_pb2.py: No module named google.protobuf

2012-04-26 Thread Jeff Licquia
I fixed this one. Apparently, there was some weird issue when upgrading from oneiric; "apt-get --reinstall install python-protobuf" caused Ubuntu One to start working for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 979080] Re: ubuntuone-syncdaemon crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ubuntuone-storage-protocol/ubuntuone/storageprotocol/protocol_pb2.py: No module named google.protobuf

2012-04-11 Thread Jeff Licquia
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979080 Title: ubuntuone-syncdaemon crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python2.7 /dist-packages/ubuntuone-storage-

[Bug 908578] Re: synergys segv on paste into chrome's address bar

2011-12-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
For status in Debian, see here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653257 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #653257 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653257 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

Re: [Bug 900791] Re: Add printer takes too long (users cancel before completing)

2011-12-14 Thread Jeff Licquia
Can you tell me which URL is being hit which takes so long to respond? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900791 Title: Add printer takes too long (users cancel before completing) To man

[Bug 832603] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_simple_async_result_complete()

2011-09-29 Thread Jeff Licquia
Can confirm the fix. With 0ubuntu2, got the crash. Upgraded just gnome-settings-daemon, logged out, then back in, and no crash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832603 Title: gnome-se

[Bug 860686] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_simple_async_result_complete()

2011-09-29 Thread Jeff Licquia
FWIW, I just went through the crash report tool for this bug, with 3.2.0-0ubuntu2. After reading the bug, I upgraded just gnome-settings- daemon to 3.2.0-0ubuntu3, logged out, and logged back in. So far, I have not experienced a crash. I think this is evidence that this is a dup of #832603, and

[Bug 829635] Re: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in function(): markup_escape_text() takes at most 1 argument (2 given)

2011-09-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
My bug (845893) was filed against apport 1.22.1-0ubuntu2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829635 Title: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in function(): markup_escape_text() takes at

[Bug 845893] Re: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in ui_present_crash(): glib.markup_escape_text() takes at most 1 argument (2 given)

2011-09-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 829635 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829635 ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845893 Title: apport-gtk cra

[Bug 780972] Re: desktopcouch-service crashed with Unauthorized in request(): ('unauthorized', 'Authentication required.')

2011-09-01 Thread Jeff Licquia
FWIW, didn't happen to me until today. I've been running onieric for a little over a week, and haven't had the problem until today. Ran update last night, which required a reboot (kernel update). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 816950] Re: Oneiric shutdown : Tomboy not responding

2011-08-22 Thread Jeff Licquia
Tomboy does this on natty for me, with one difference: if you just wait, it goes away on its own after a very short wait (a few seconds). On oneiric, I've waited for several minutes for it to close on its own, with no luck. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 798881] [NEW] offline mode doesn't save sent mail in some cases

2011-06-17 Thread Jeff Licquia
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunderbird Here's the situation: I go offline in Thunderbird on my laptop, send some mail, and then go back online. The mail is sent successfully, but the email is not saved to the configured Sent folder. Thunderbird pops up a warning to that effect, a

[Bug 726391] Re: Gwibber should load new messages on demand, like Twitter web client

2011-05-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
Another possible way to do something like this: TweetDeck for Android remembers the most recent viewed message, and positions the list so that this message is on top. Scrolling up from there causes new messages to come into view. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 141641] Re: installing lsb requires postfix

2010-02-23 Thread Jeff Licquia
Martin Pitt wrote: > So what we could on on the Ubuntu side is to default to a > "invalid-m-t-a" package which implements /usr/bin/sendmail as "exit 1", > and if people actually need an MTA, they can pick and install one. My only request: exit -1 instead of exit 1, per the spec: http://refspecs.l

Re: [Bug 141641] Re: installing lsb requires postfix

2010-02-20 Thread Jeff Licquia
Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > I'm amazed that it hasn't crossed anyone's mind that the LSB mind be > hopelessly backward thinking, when it expects sendmail to be present > upon every system. In honesty, too many of the LSB specification's > elements point to a fixed-IP network built of traditional UN

[Bug 386128] Re: lsb must pull lsb-printing

2009-07-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
It's in Karmic, too. Patch for Karmic attached. ** Attachment added: "Patch for Karmic to fix wrong deps." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28778119/lsb-ubuntu-deps-karmic.patch -- lsb must pull lsb-printing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386128 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 386128] Re: lsb must pull lsb-printing

2009-07-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
After checking, I've confirmed that the Jaunty version of the lsb package has this bug. Patch attached which will fix it. Will check status of Karmic. ** Attachment added: "Patch to fix wrong deps." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/2802/lsb-ubuntu-deps.patch -- lsb must pull lsb-printing

Re: [Bug 141641] Re: installing lsb requires postfix

2009-06-12 Thread Jeff Licquia
Martin Pitt wrote: > The actual flaw here is that it encourages applications to rely on being > able to send local mail, forget about it, and assume that the user > actually read it. The requirement is actually an effect, not a cause, of that encouragement. We've got 20+ years of history behind t

Re: [Bug 141641] Re: installing lsb requires postfix

2009-06-12 Thread Jeff Licquia
Martin Pitt wrote: > As I pointed out, I'd object to that. We did such a thing in the past > (ship a cripped MTA by default), and people didn't like us for that. > > The LSB requirement was certainly not written with the idea in mind to > swallow all input to sendmail into a big black hole. No, b

Re: [Bug 141641] [NEW] installing lsb requires postfix

2009-06-12 Thread Jeff Licquia
Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: > Is it normal (and absolutely necessary) that when one installs lsb, postfix > is pulled at the same time from the requirement ? > Installing a daemon is not something that trivial from a security point of > view and there are many case where lsb might be needed on

Re: [Bug 386128] [NEW] lsb must pull lsb-printing

2009-06-11 Thread Jeff Licquia
Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: > You have been subscribed to a public bug by Till Kamppeter (till-kamppeter): Thanks, Till, for the heads-up. > Binary package hint: lsb > > The printing requirements which got introduced to the LSB starting with > version 3.2 are not an add-on. They are required to

Re: [Bug 370066] Re: LSB 4.0 support

2009-06-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
Steve Langasek wrote: > BTW, Jeff, the patch linked above seems to have a cut-n-paste error for > the new lsb-security package, claiming to be the "Linux Standards Base > Printing specification". I assume that "Linux Standards Base Security > specification" is correct? Yes, thanks for catching th

[Bug 376732] [NEW] Hardy foomatic-rip PageSetup is broken, fails LSB tests

2009-05-14 Thread Jeff Licquia
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: foomatic-filters When running the tests for LSB 4.0 on Hardy, several tests of foomatic- rip fail. These tests break printing under certain circumstances. For more details, see LSB bug 2418: http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2418 Upstream has

[Bug 370066] [NEW] LSB 4.0 support

2009-04-30 Thread Jeff Licquia
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lsb Attached is a patch to include the proper information for the lsb package to support LSB 4.0. A similar patch will be filed against Debian soon. ** Affects: lsb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- LSB 4.0 support https://bu

[Bug 370066] Re: LSB 4.0 support

2009-04-30 Thread Jeff Licquia
** Attachment added: "lsb-ubuntu.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26191828/lsb-ubuntu.patch -- LSB 4.0 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ub

Re: [Bug 194029] Re: 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue

2008-07-14 Thread Jeff Licquia
Joel Fuster wrote: > I applied your patch and rebuilt Synergy, but I still have the lag issue. I > am using it as a client to a WinXP machine. Potentially relevant information: > * Running an up-to-date 8.04 > * I have an SMP machine > * It is most pronounced for me with Mozilla Thunderbir

Re: [Bug 194029] Re: 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue

2008-07-14 Thread Jeff Licquia
WSmart wrote: > I just installed Xubuntu Hardy and I was running Synergy for a period > without a problem, Ubuntu Gutsy as server. Suddenly it's unusable. > Might be a coincidence, but this happened right after I first tried to > copy text from a browser. That was the first time I tried to use th

[Bug 194029] Re: 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue

2008-06-26 Thread Jeff Licquia
Matt: If it still works at all, I doubt you did too much wrong. :-) The fix was very specific to the X11 code, and may have only fixed the client side. So there may be some more work to do. OTOH, I've also noticed a few bugs related to the Windows client, so it could be something else. If you

[Bug 194029] Re: 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue

2008-06-24 Thread Jeff Licquia
Debian maintainer here. In Debian, synergy has been working fine up until we get Xlib-XCB into unstable/testing; it still worked fine even with kernel 2.6.24. So, it seems the combination of the newer kernel and Xlib was the catalyst. Still, I can confirm that Mike Stroyan's patch seems to clear

[Bug 220201] Re: htmldoc - wrong linking - anchor bookmarks inside two different documents, same bookmark name

2008-06-19 Thread Jeff Licquia
This bug had been reported upstream, and upstream has indicated they won't fix it until 1.9: http://www.htmldoc.org/str.php?L94+P0+S-2+C0+I40+E0+M10+Q -- htmldoc - wrong linking - anchor bookmarks inside two different documents, same bookmark name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220201 You rece

[Bug 184141] libstdc++6 has a binary incompatibility

2008-01-18 Thread Jeff Licquia
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libstdc++6 LSB testing in preparation for LSB 3.2 has uncovered a binary incompatibility in libstdc++6 for gutsy. Basically, there was a period of time, between the end of June and the beginning of October, when several members of the C++ typeinfo class