[Bug 1619921] Re: Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth

2019-02-22 Thread Jason Mills
TL;DR: Need yubikey-luks 0.5.1 in U18.10/Cosmic please. :-) This is the relevant change that gets pulled-in: https://github.com/cornelinux/yubikey-luks/issues/37 ** Bug watch added: github.com/cornelinux/yubikey-luks/issues #37 https://github.com/cornelinux/yubikey-luks/issues/37 -- You rece

[Bug 1619921] Re: Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth

2019-02-22 Thread Jason Mills
Took some additional digging, but already confirmed, and definitely yubikey-luks side of the fence... it was using a non-public interface. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904162#15 Looks like there was some refactoring, and ostensibly this is fixed in a later iteration of yubike

[Bug 1619921] Re: Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth

2019-02-22 Thread Jason Mills
Possibly Guilhem (~7-guilhem / @7-guilhem here on Launchpad) could confirm `/conf/conf.d/cryptroot` is officially/intentionally retired? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619921 Title:

[Bug 1619921] Re: Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth

2019-02-22 Thread Jason Mills
Conclusion thus far: What I am seeing might be a new breakage of yubikey-luks in U18.10/Cosmic. I dug up an older Ubuntu system (U16.04.3 LTS) that is known-working with Yubikey LUKS + Plymouth, and `/conf/conf.d/cryptroot` is present in initramfs. Contents is one line, a target specification for

[Bug 1619921] Re: Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth

2019-02-22 Thread Jason Mills
Interesting tidbits from Cosmic (U18.10), running with `splash` removed from boot arguments (i.e. disable Plymouth splash). Boot LUKS prompt display: sed: /conf/conf.d/cryptroot: No such file or directory ... (unrelated LVMeta'd warning) /scripts/local-top/cryptroot: line 218: fold:

[Bug 1619921] Re: Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth

2019-02-22 Thread Jason Mills
Resurfaced in Cosmic (U18.10) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619921 Title: Password Prompt for yubikey not showing in Plymouth To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://

[Bug 1756633] Re: Backport request, 16.04 LTS (w/ Spectre/Meltdown fixups)

2018-03-27 Thread Jason Mills
@sdeziel -- I have tested on an Ivy Bridge era (i5-3427U) and Apollo Lake era (N3350) system thus far. The former is covered by the Intel 20180312 release, the latter is not. If time permits I'll also test on a Skylake system. Everything seems to be working properly w/r2 updated microcode query an

[Bug 1640635] Re: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present

2018-03-21 Thread Jason Mills
Additional nuance: On a netplan enabled system also using cloud-init (+ curtin), the same assertion is made regarding how to disable network functionality tied to cloud-init is mentioned in /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml ("… disable via stanza in /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.c

[Bug 1640635] Re: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even if /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/99-disable-network-config.cfg present

2018-03-21 Thread Jason Mills
** Also affects: netplan Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640635 Title: cloud-init creates /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg even

[Bug 1756633] [NEW] Backport request, 16.04 LTS (w/ Spectre/Meltdown fixups)

2018-03-17 Thread Jason Mills
Public bug reported: Once the post Spectre/Meltdown situation has stabilized, it would be appreciated if that edition of Intel CPU microcode is backported into Xenial / 16.04 LTS. Thanks :-) ** Affects: intel-microcode (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received th

[Bug 1435695] Re: intel-microcode could use better docs about upstream versions per CPU

2018-03-17 Thread Jason Mills
~ 2 years later ... :-) For item 2, Intel now* documents what CPU family and stepping(s) are covered by each "Intel Processor Microcode" data file bundle. However, it would be better just point to the authoritative location, rather than engaging in lots of copy-pasta (yes pun) from the upstream so