[Bug 1244890] Re: REGRESSION: Draw connector skew is lost on opening

2013-11-14 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
This is a major bug which basically destroys all documents that are opened, modified and then saved. This problem is also documented in [1] and [2]. It practically makes Draw not only unsuable but is a real threat to existing document based. This is definitely not fixed in 4.1.2 rc3 (saucy) and is

[Bug 1244890] Re: REGRESSION: Draw connector skew is lost on opening

2013-11-14 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
And [3]. [3] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70210 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244890 Title: REGRESSION: Draw connector skew is lost on opening To manage notificati

[Bug 1180513] Re: lid close actions are ignored laptop always suspends

2013-11-08 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
The issue is still present (Thinkpad T420s) with 3.8.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180513 Title: lid close actions are ignored laptop always suspends To manage notifications abou

[Bug 1054948] Re: dmraid broken for large drives

2012-09-24 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
Great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054948 Title: dmraid broken for large drives To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug

[Bug 1054948] Re: dmraid broken for large drives

2012-09-24 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
If co-existence of dmraid and mdadm would be just an incremental step for later versions, exclusive-or would at least a step forward for mdadm and I would be happy to test that (isms root + shutdown). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 1054948] Re: dmraid broken for large drives

2012-09-24 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
But wouldn't that simply only imply that dmraid and mdadm are not supposed to co-exist? I'm a bit puzzled about this change. As far as I understand this, the auto-assemble rules have been removed just to guarantee the function of dmraid - temporarily or not. Automated installation procedure asi

[Bug 1028677] Re: mdadm should be used for fakeraid (instead of dmraid)

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
Just for reference, #957494 is an incomplete fix for the readonly issue mentioned above. mdmon is still missing in the initrd which leads to read-only arrays. Inclusion of mdmon into the image fixes this. However, system shutdown is still broken in this case. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1054948] Re: dmraid broken for large drives

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
Just for reference, with disable auto-assembly you mean the changes in mdadm 3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2 (#1030292)? Would one be required to set up custom udev rules or which package version contains rules for mdadm auto-assembly? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1054948] Re: dmraid broken for large drives

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
For new installations, mdadm should be the default. Migration is not necessary, dmraid could be post-installed. As dmraid isn't under development anymore and drive capacities and the kind of platform won't go away, this will sooner rather than later become a widespread critical issue. -- You rece

[Bug 1054948] [NEW] dmraid broken for large drives

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
Public bug reported: Attempting to set up a fresh Quantal system on a system with Intel 'fakeraid' (imsm, 1.3) and 3TB SATA RAID1. When running the live CD, dmraid identifies the drives as being of size 746GB (Same effect with a Windows 7 setup without loading the corresponding Intel drivers pr

[Bug 1030292] Re: initramfs does not boot with mdadm (3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1)

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
dmraid is essentially broken for large drives (unable to set up an imsm raid1 array on 3TB, 'fakeraid'), there is no way around mdadm. Simply disabling mdadm is not a fix. See also #957494 and #957494. Since the mdadm package is currently severly broken when the system root is part of an array

[Bug 1054773] Re: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian)

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
But maybe related/duplicate of #1030292 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054773 Title: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian) To manage notifications about th

[Bug 1054773] Re: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian)

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
And it is not a duplicate of #957494 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054773 Title: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian) To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1054773] Re: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian)

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
Also [1]. [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/36900 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054773 Title: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian) To manag

[Bug 1054773] Re: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian)

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
Also related to this is [1]. [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/36852 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054773 Title: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (fro

[Bug 1054773] Re: mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian)

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
I should add that this is a problem only if the system / is part of the array itself and therefore must be setup in initrd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054773 Title: mdadm: suppor

[Bug 1028677] Re: mdadm should be used for fakeraid (instead of dmraid)

2012-09-22 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
It is critical to replace dmraid with mdadm as dmraid is unable to deal with large disk sizes. For a 3TB imsm raid1 dual-boot ('fakeraid') in my case the disks were shown as ~746GB sized and dmraid -an would not release them. So the only way was to boot the live cd with nodmraid and manually instal

[Bug 1054773] [NEW] mdadm: support external metadata arrays correctly (from debian)

2012-09-22 Thread Jan Kleinsorge
Public bug reported: The mdadm package is currently seriously broken for Intel IMSM/"fakeraid" setups since mdmon is not part of the initrd (tested on quantal alpha3) and therefore only sets up a read-only array which breaks the boot process. If booted from a live cd and entered via a jail root, m