[Bug 232476] Re: Xlib can deadlock when using mutlithreaded

2009-10-09 Thread Jamey Sharp
I think the original poster's problem should have been solved with the socket-handoff rework in newer libX11/libxcb, such as the versions Norbert most recently reported success with from Jaunty. It isn't obvious to me that Karol's bug or Norbert's locking assertion failure were the same bug as the

[Bug 87947] Re: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2008-06-18 Thread Jamey Sharp
Thanks for testing! The handoff patches are based on libxcb git commit 7a74ba3d0212f9bfe021d6da9070f71cbc53f85b and libX11 git commit 64325f38bab082a8e0e9ce779a8e582de5c8588e. It'll probably apply against newer versions of libX11, but there's been a lot of work in libxcb since we started trying to

[Bug 86103] Re: azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2008-03-15 Thread Jamey Sharp
Josh and I just proposed a set of changes to XCB and Xlib/XCB which, among other things, should address all the outstanding assertion failures and synchronization problems that we know of. Could anyone experiencing this bug please build XCB and Xlib with the patches found at http://lists.freedeskt

[Bug 87947] Re: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2008-03-15 Thread Jamey Sharp
Josh and I just proposed a set of changes to XCB and Xlib/XCB which, among other things, should address all the outstanding assertion failures and synchronization problems that we know of. Could anyone experiencing this bug please build XCB and Xlib with the patches found at http://lists.freedeskt

[Bug 185311] Re: hardy, locking assertion failure, xorg/libsdl

2008-03-15 Thread Jamey Sharp
Josh and I just announced a set of changes to XCB and Xlib/XCB which, among other things, should address all the outstanding assertion failures that we know of. Could anyone experiencing this bug please build XCB and Xlib with the patches found at http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/2008-Mar

Re: [Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-12-18 Thread Jamey Sharp
On 12/18/07, Che Guevara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Setting back to confirmed as this bug is back for hardy If you can confirm this bug, then you have an obligation to provide a lot more information. Many quite different problems were reported in this Launchpad bug, and many things have changed

Re: [Bug 86103] Re: azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-11-17 Thread Jamey Sharp
On 11/12/07, Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I reapply the "allow sloppy locks" workaround patch to libxcb the > problem is gone. By "the problem", you mean the stack trace you just reported? That's very strange. I can't find anything related to Xlib or XCB near the top of the stack traces you

Re: [Bug 86103] Re: azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-10-27 Thread Jamey Sharp
On 10/27/07, James Stansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ubuntu Gutsy repositories have the icedtea packages based on JDK7 beta 21. > The Hardy archives have the beta 22 packages. Fascinating, and good for them! I didn't know Ubuntu had icedtea integrated in any sense yet. For the record, though,

Re: [Bug 86103] Re: azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-10-27 Thread Jamey Sharp
On 10/27/07, Luke Hoersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it's just the JDK. Many people trying to use the JRE are > having the same problem ... Yes, this is a generic Java issue. The JRE is a subset of the JDK that contains almost all the same code. The distinction is too troublesome

Re: [Bug 86103] Re: azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-10-23 Thread Jamey Sharp
On 10/23/07, Luke Hoersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Googling the error shows that this is a widespread problem. Sun claims it's > already fixed: > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6532373 > Perhaps the package just needs to be updated or patched? Sun reports the Java bug is

Re: [Bug 86103] Re: azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-10-21 Thread Jamey Sharp
On 10/16/07, Dirk R. Gently <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A library is the issue? NWN worked fine for me until I added the > "Undrentide" expansion pack. Seems related to the > /nwn/en/miles/libmss.so.6.5.2 file. I don't have NWN so I can't reproduce your issue. It's unrelated to the Java bug (wh

[Bug 87947] Re: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-06-10 Thread Jamey Sharp
I believe this bug is now fixed in upstream libX11 git. http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/lib/libX11.git;a=commitdiff;h=c2f88cdf5cd9c94b77e5bfdac572b5ac06ab4aa8 ** Changed in: libx11 (Debian) Sourcepackagename: libxcb => libx11 Bugwatch: Debian Bug tracker #401571 => Debian Bug tracker #4

[Bug 87351] Re: Xorg uses 100% CPU

2007-06-03 Thread Jamey Sharp
This doesn't sound like an XCB-related bug, especially since Ubuntu currently isn't using XCB, so I've marked it no longer a duplicate of #88815. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 88815 Sluggish rendering since xorg 7.2 update -- Xorg uses 100% CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87

[Bug 90072] Re: [feisty5] kcmshell crashes on closing following administrator mode

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
Josh Triplett and I are doing the upstream release wrangling right now. I expect we'll release libX11 1.1.2 tomorrow. -- [feisty5] kcmshell crashes on closing following administrator mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 87947] Re: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
Per the debian-devel-announce message, please make sure your X libraries are up to date. If you can still reproduce the problem, can you supply a backtrace? -- xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87947 You received this bug notification

[Bug 96901] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
Given that the crash occurred in malloc, this sounds like arena corruption rather than an XCB bug. -- [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -

[Bug 97604] Re: [apport] kicker crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
The mention of _xcb_unlock_io looks very much like stack corruption. I doubt that the segfault actually occurred in XCB. ** Summary changed: - [apport] kicker crashed with SIGSEGV in _xcb_unlock_io() + [apport] kicker crashed with SIGSEGV -- [apport] kicker crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.lau

[Bug 88906] Re: synergyc crashes when opening a new gnome-terminal tab

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
Can you supply a backtrace for this problem? -- synergyc crashes when opening a new gnome-terminal tab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@l

[Bug 99385] Re: vmware reporting libxcb not found after upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
On further thought, it sounds like Ubuntu needs to supply a 32-bit version of libxcb. -- vmware reporting libxcb not found after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubun

[Bug 99385] Re: vmware reporting libxcb not found after upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
Since the libraries exist and yet aren't being found by the dynamic linker, it seems pretty clear that this is not an XCB bug. Sounds like an Ubuntu packaging bug, perhaps. -- vmware reporting libxcb not found after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99385 You received this bug notification

[Bug 99560] Re: vmware does not run on feisty because of assertion failure in libxcb

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
Can you supply a backtrace for this problem? -- vmware does not run on feisty because of assertion failure in libxcb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 99667] Re: [apport] beryl crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
The stack trace looks completely corrupt. I find it very unlikely that the crash actually occurred in xcb_poll_for_event. ** Summary changed: - [apport] beryl crashed with SIGSEGV in xcb_poll_for_event() + [apport] beryl crashed with SIGSEGV -- [apport] beryl crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.l

[Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
We believe that current libX11 from upstream git fixes the problems when GL-using apps exit on systems with the proprietary nVidia driver. To the people who reported other bugs here: please ensure your X libraries are up-to-date, and if you can still reproduce the problem please supply a backtrace

[Bug 96703] Re: Kubuntu System Settings crashes on exit

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
We believe this bug is fixed in current upstream libX11 git. -- Kubuntu System Settings crashes on exit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@

[Bug 95266] Re: Updated libxcb1 crashes the system.

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
Can you supply a backtrace for these crashes? -- Updated libxcb1 crashes the system. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com ht

[Bug 89211] Re: Monitor & Display (in System Settings) is always crashing

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
We believe this bug is fixed in current upstream libX11 git. -- Monitor & Display (in System Settings) is always crashing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-systemsettings in ubuntu. --

[Bug 90072] Re: [feisty5] kcmshell crashes on closing following administrator mode

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
We believe this bug is fixed in current upstream libX11 git. -- [feisty5] kcmshell crashes on closing following administrator mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kdebase in ubuntu. --

[Bug 91077] Re: Closing glxgears window causes xcb_xlib_lock assertion and sound interruption

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
We believe this bug is fixed in current upstream libX11 git. -- Closing glxgears window causes xcb_xlib_lock assertion and sound interruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 86103] Re: azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
The Neverwinter Nights issue is unrelated to the bug originally reported here. The bug likely lies in a library that NWN is using, rather than in the game itself, and so is likely fixable. A backtrace would help in tracking down the cause of that failure. Regarding the Sun Java bug, according to J

[Bug 86103] Re: azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
The Neverwinter Nights issue is unrelated to the bug originally reported here. The bug likely lies in a library that NWN is using, rather than in the game itself, and so is likely fixable. A backtrace would help in tracking down the cause of that failure. Regarding the Sun Java bug, according to J

[Bug 88815] Re: Sluggish rendering since xorg 7.2 update

2007-06-02 Thread Jamey Sharp
The x11perf results are a known issue, but not obviously significant. (How many apps do you have that use the X NoOperation request?) Despite our belief that the "slow" requests have almost no impact on real applications, we are working on improvements in this area. However, I believe the bug you