How long till a fix is relreased? Its kinda very important to ubuntu
server system administrator like me. Please do the needful as soon as
possible
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055114
** Description changed:
When trying to suspend my Laptop (clicking suspend in the drop down menu) the
screen goes black and all lights go out, but then everything springs back to
life and the computer shows me the login screen again. When clicking suspend
(in the drop down menu) again the GUI
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960808
Title:
Suspend does not work, trying twice crashes GUI. Hibernation crashes
GUI when having have
** Description changed:
When trying to suspend my Laptop (clicking suspend in the drop down menu) the
screen goes black and all lights go out, but then everything springs back to
life and the computer shows me the login screen again. When clicking suspend
(in the drop down menu) again the GUI
Public bug reported:
When trying to suspend my Laptop (clicking suspend in the drop down menu) the
screen goes black and all lights go out, but then everything springs back to
life and the computer shows me the login screen again. When clicking suspend
(in the drop down menu) again the GUI cras
Public bug reported:
installation of the package lxd crashed .
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: lxd 1:0.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-26.28-generic 5.3.13
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-26-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.2
AptOrdering:
lxd:amd64: Purge
NULL: C
Public bug reported:
I attempted to install Ubuntu onto my second hard disk with a new
partition table, and while installing grub2 failed to install and meant
I would not be able to load.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: ubiquity 2.21.63.3 [modified:
lib/partman/automaticall
Public bug reported:
Tried to Install GIMP, but it didn't work
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libstdc++6:amd64 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-28.47-generic 4.4.13
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.2
** Summary changed:
- Can't create GPG key - it stop before before asking for passphrase
+ Can't create GPG key - it stop before asking for passphrase
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158
** Description changed:
My distribution: lubuntu 16.04
environment: encrypted home drive
I have run the following to create the key for signing
gnu --gen-key
The program interactively asks for information and it was provided
accordingly.
- at the end this is information I r
Public bug reported:
My distribution: lubuntu 16.04
environment: encrypted home drive
I have run the following to create the key for signing
gnu --gen-key
The program interactively asks for information and it was provided
accordingly.
at the end this is information I receive
Change (N)ame, (C
14.04
A few days ago it's work in the System Setting → Keyboards. Now,
manually bind shortcut using CCSM works for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1224732
Title:
Custom keyboard s
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773040
Title:
package initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
stat
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: initramfs-tools
This error always occurs when I'm doing anything with apt-get
(installing, removing, ...).
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
U
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642190/+attachment/1603780/+files/AlsaDevices.txt
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642190/+attachment/1603781/+files/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: pulseaudio
.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: pulseaudio 1:0.9.22~0.9.21+stable-queue-32-g8478-0ubuntu19
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.32-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sou
I guess it's a general problem with rounded progress bars in the murrine
engine.
--
Progress bars look odd for little progress using Radiance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551107
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
yep, this bug is still present in 0.1.6.4.
I've tested it with `zenity --progress --percentage=6`
** Attachment added: "zenity percentage=6, bug still present"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44317974/progressbar-zenity.png
--
Progress bars look odd for little progress using Radiance
https://b
** Attachment added: "Nautilus sidepane in Karmic"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44277843/karmic-nautilus-sidepane.png
--
Border of nautilus sidepane looks not smooth
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563914
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
** Attachment added: "Nautilus sidepane in Lucid"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44277755/lucid-nautilus-sidepane.png
--
Border of nautilus sidepane looks not smooth
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563914
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: light-themes
The thin, dark border around the nautilus sidepane and fileview doesn't
look nice in my opinion. Without it, nautilus looks much cleaner (which
is the case if I'm using light-themes on Karmic, see screenshot).
I'm not sure if this can be fix
Whoops, sorry, didn't notice that. I've created a new patch using the
latest update.
** Patch added: "Patch for lighter buttons in Radiance (light-themes 0.1.6.0)."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42438757/gtkrc.patch
--
buttons are too dark and blurry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542736
You
(Sorry, I decided to just add the *.patch file, not the whole gtkrc)
--
buttons are too dark and blurry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542736
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
** Attachment removed: "Full gtkrc including patch for lighter buttons in
Radiance."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42006190/gtkrc-lighter-buttons
** Patch added: "Patch for lighter buttons in Radiance."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42006506/gtkrc.patch
--
buttons are too dark and blurry
** Attachment added: "Full gtkrc including patch for lighter buttons in
Radiance."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42006190/gtkrc-lighter-buttons
--
buttons are too dark and blurry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542736
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Totally agree on that.
After playing around with the gtkrc of Radiance I've found a setting
which looks good imho (see the attachment) and is more consistent with
the buttons used in the software center.
I just added the following settings to the `style "button" = "wider"`-section:
http://paste.p
@Mark: Doesn't work for me. If he change UUID to /dev/sda1 in grub and
fstab, I get this message and then it drops me into BusyBox:
mount: mounting /sys on /root/sys failed: No such file or directory.
... (some more of these messages, but with other directories) ...
Target filesystem doesn't have
** Package changed: ubuntu => initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
--
root filesystem fails to mount
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33269
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
** Tags added: 2.6.31 boot linux root
** Tags removed: cft-2.6.31
--
root filesystem fails to mount
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33269
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
It's also booting if I remove the quiet-option from the grub kernel
command line (but not the "set quiet=1" as in the recovery mode menu
entry). Why is the system not booting with the quiet-option, but
without?
--
root filesystem fails to mount
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33269
You received t
Booting recovery mode works. But doing normal boot still doesn't work
after installing all updates since beta-release (now kernel 2.6.21-14).
--
root filesystem fails to mount
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33269
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Output of "cat /proc/modules":
usbhid 38208 0 - Live 0xf8026000
forcedeth 54152 0 - Live 0xf805f000
--
root filesystem fails to mount
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33269
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
I have a similiar problem here on Ubuntu Karmic Beta:
- Athlon 64 with ASRock N68PV-GS Mainboard and nForce 630 Chipset
- 2 SATA (no raid)
- sda1: root
- sdb1: my data
When trying to boot Ubuntu Karmic, after a few seconds it drops to a
BusyBox shell with the message:
"Gave up waiting for roo
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33557975/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33557985/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33557994/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: jffnms
tried to install mysql and jffnms together... it doesn't accept mysql
password.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Oct 13 01:29:50 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
** Attachment added: "HCL MiLeap"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25937462/evtouch_hal.out
--
evtouch meta bug to collect lshal info
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
This is the emerald theme
** Attachment added: "creamlooks-0.0.4.emerald"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17274379/creamlooks-0.0.4.emerald
--
Ugly step in shadow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238683
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
I did it on this way because there is only one "Attachment-Include-Box" when
writing a comment.
Now I've added two attachments ;)
** Attachment removed: "Archive includes a screenshot of the bug and the
used emerald theme"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17268574/emerald-bug.tar.gz
** Attachm
Hi,
I'm not Sebastian but I'm involved in the project
I've attached the screenshot and the emerald theme as a gzip archive.
Immanuel
** Attachment added: "Archive includes a screenshot of the bug and the used
emerald theme"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17
The JavaSVN bundled with Subclipse 1.1.8 seems to be a 1.4 Subversion
client. The current command line client is 1.3.
After I used Subclipse to update my working copies, I can no longer use
the command line client (the following message is displayed):
svn: This client is too old to work with w
40 matches
Mail list logo
