Bump, something needs to be done about this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916800
Title:
Unmaintained and can crash, leaving fans at minimum speed
To manage notifications about thi
** Also affects: macfanctld
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916800
Title:
Unmaintained and can crash, leaving fans at minimum speed
To man
Original bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gui-
ufw/+bug/1916799.
I'd like to get the above patch into Ubuntu to fix this issue, I'm
assuming you have the ability to do that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Marked as invalid as unintentional duplicate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918468
Title:
Ubuntu 20.04: GUFW doesn't display firewall information correctly
when ufw issues warnin
Public bug reported:
Hello,
1) Ubuntu release: 20.04 LTS
2) GUFW version: 20.04.1-1ubuntu1
3) Firewall displays information and state correctly despite warnings from UFW.
4) Firewall displays no rules and incorrectly displays enable/disabled status.
Previous discussion here: https://answers.laun
Unsure how to link to focal. Hopefully someone will notice it and pick
it up.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916799
Title:
Ubuntu 20.04: GUFW doesn't display firewall information cor
This seems to work fine now - close?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253119
Title:
PPA packages do not show a changelog in update-manager
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Also affects: gui-ufw
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916799
Title:
Ubuntu 20.04: GUFW doesn't display firewall information correctly wh
Ah, I thought that was who I was reporting it to.
I'll see if I can figure it out.
Hamish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916799
Title:
Ubuntu 20.04: GUFW doesn't display firewall i
All done, hope this helps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916800
Title:
Unmaintained and can crash, leaving fans at minimum speed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916800/+attachment/5467210/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916800
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916800/+attachment/5467209/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected third-party-packages ulyssa
** Description changed:
Hi there,
1) Ubuntu release: 20.04 LTS (Mint 20).
2) 0.6+repack1-2
3) Software controls fans correctly without any issues.
4) Software randomly crashes, leaving fans at minimum spe
Public bug reported:
Hi there,
1) Ubuntu release: 20.04 LTS (Mint 20).
2) 0.6+repack1-2
3) Software controls fans correctly without any issues.
4) Software randomly crashes, leaving fans at minimum speed regardless of temps.
This package seems to have been unmaintained for several years -
upstre
Public bug reported:
Hello,
1) Ubuntu release: 20.04 LTS
2) GUFW version: 20.04.1-1ubuntu1
3) Firewall displays information and state correctly despite warnings from UFW.
4) Firewall displays no rules and incorrectly displays enable/disabled status.
Previous discussion here: https://answers.laun
NB: Have been informed that this will trickle down from upstream into
the 5.10 kernels for Raspberry Pi OS as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861936
Title:
Raspberry Pi 3 networ
Mentioned to Raspberry Pi people at:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3850
If anyone knows of a more current bug report for this issue, let me
know.
** Bug watch added: github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues #3850
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3850
--
You received this
Nice :)
Does anyone know if this is getting into Raspberry Pi OS?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861936
Title:
Raspberry Pi 3 network dies shortly after a burst of IPv6 tunnel
net
Okay, works for me.
Package version:
3.36.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 (amd64)
Details of testing:
I changed the update frequency to 0.5 and 0.25 seconds and the network
graph and stats continued to work, unlike before when the graph stopped
displaying meaningful information.
** Tags removed: verificati
Thank you! :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881197
Title:
No network usage info presented, always 0 bytes/s.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
I have the same issue, in my case at least it's definitely the issue you
found Sebastien.
As pointed out at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
system-monitor/+question/693912, Ubuntu is not a rolling release, but it
would improve UX, and as noted at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableR
NB: I'm using Linux Mint 20, which is based on Ubuntu 20.04 and uses the
gnome-system-monitor package from Ubuntu 20.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881197
Title:
No network usage
Have you tried the new overlay (dwc2)? It worked really well for me,
thread and instructions here:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3843
** Bug watch added: github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues #3843
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3843
--
You received this bug notificat
@scubachristopher what kernel version did that put you on?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861936
Title:
Raspberry Pi 3 network dies shortly after a burst of IPv6 tunnel
network loa
Also happens on Linux 5.4 on Raspbian 10.
Okay, I'll keep that in mind. At the moment I'm trying a different
overlay (driver) for the USB chip to see if that helps (not sure yet,
though it hasn't helped with the HDD).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I'm having this issue as well, but on Raspbian 10. Symptoms seems the
same, generally occurs with high load. However, I don't seem to need
IPv6 packets to cause this - my network is IPv4 only.
I thought I had a power problem because I am also using an external HDD
(it's also working as a NAS), but
NB: On Linux 4.9. I'll post here again if it happens on the new kernel
(5.4).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861936
Title:
Raspberry Pi 3 network dies shortly after a burst of IPv6 t
NB: In Debian testing (11) my Ryzen 3600 system boots and runs a 32-bit
image okay.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876737
Title:
GRUB refuses to boot a 32-bit kernel when in EFI mode
As discussed I suppose you can either use an older version of GRUB-EFI
(which as pointed out may cause unknown problems), or perhaps you can
boot in CSM mode?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Okay then, I guess I won't report. 32-bit x86 is going away for a lot of
distros so I doubt the kernel people will have any interest in doing it
tbh.
Glad I'm moving my Debian live disk away from doing this then if it
breaks lots of stuff :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Alkis,
Do you want me to file this for RedHat, or are you/have you already done
so?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876737
Title:
GRUB refuses to boot a 32-bit kernel when in EFI mod
I feel like this is maybe missing the point. These things seem clear to
me:
1. Loading 64-bit kernels on 32-bit UEFIs is a useful feature to have
and I'm glad it was added.
2. AFAICT, the patch was not intended to break loading 32-bit kernels on
64-bit systems (and also what would be the point of
That might be unrelated, unless they use Ubuntu grub packages/patches?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876737
Title:
GRUB refuses to boot a 32-bit kernel when in EFI mode
To manage n
Yes, it'd be good to see this fixed, even if it's not an official fix. I
care more if it's affecting schools rather than just me with my weird
setup.
For what it's worth, Debian Buster's packages don't seem to exhibit
these issues - could install those and lock the version perhaps?
--
You receiv
Thanks for letting me know.
I'm not sure why that change is there either, but I guess there must be
a reason.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876737
Title:
GRUB refuses to boot a 32-
Public bug reported:
Also reported at https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?58300, but
doesn't occur in Debian's v2.04 from Bulleye, and only occurred in the
last few months, so it might be an Ubuntu bug.
This is grub version 2.02-2ubuntu8.15 as reported by "apt show grub-efi"
GRUB2 fails to b
Regardless, it'd be great for this to make it into the LTS release, but
I don't know how to make that happen. It might also be too late, but I
hope not.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17
Don't know if someone should mark as fix committed in this case, seeing
as there are fixes out there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1705064
Title:
lshw doesn't have logicalname, ser
Also works for me. In my case, I ran the binary on Ubuntu 18.04 because
that's what my real hardware is using.
If we can get this into Focal, that'd be great, but I wonder if we can
backport into previous releases as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Note that Fedora has patches in
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1329140 that fix
the NVME issue - maybe these could be used in the Ubuntu package builds
too?
I tried building lshw from the master branch, including the above fix
(comment #1), but it didn't work. However, I can
Doesn't appear to have been looked at yet, but still a longstanding
issue
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851674
Ti
Possibly linked to this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/gnome-software/+bug/1778607
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851674
Title:
All deb packages as being listed as "
Note that the output was from an Ubuntu 18.04 VM.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851674
Title:
All deb packages as being listed as "Proprietary" when opened in
gnome-software
To m
Attached is the output from that command.
** Attachment added: "Output from jounralctl -b 0 on affected system"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1851674/+attachment/5304835/+files/log.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
** Description changed:
It seems all open-source packages, including for example the official
package for lshw (https://packages.ubuntu.com/disco/lshw) seem to be
listed as "Proprietary" in gnome-software/Ubuntu Software. This seems to
- happen from Ubuntu 18.04, with official and 3rd party
Public bug reported:
It seems all open-source packages, including for example the official
package for lshw (https://packages.ubuntu.com/disco/lshw) seem to be
listed as "Proprietary" in gnome-software/Ubuntu Software. This seems to
happen from Ubuntu 18.04, with official and 3rd party packages (l
Agreed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844518
Title:
Ubuntu 19:10 - Python 3 os.path.isfile not working as expected
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
Public bug reported:
When one runs "os.path.isfile("/vmlinuz")" or the same for
os.path.exists, False is returned. However, given the information at:
https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/os.path.html#os.path.isfile and
https://docs.python.org/3.7/library/os.path.html#os.path.isfile, True
should be
Tested on my production system (Mint 19.1 aka Bionic), and the test
script provided in the description is now working fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806060
Title:
Newer version
The script is passing in cosmic as well.
Changing verification-needed-bionic and verification-needed-cosmic to
verification-done-bionic and verification-done-cosmic.
I'm leaving the original verification-needed tag for the moment, in case
anyone else wants to test / extra testing is needed.
** T
Noted that the lower-case version is not equivalent.
Just tested, and working in bionic - the script in the description works
successfully for all options.
Now testing in cosmic.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notifi
Link to the bug: https://gitlab.com/psmisc/psmisc/issues/13
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806060
Title:
Newer versions of killall (Ubuntu 18.04+) fail when signal specified
in cap
Looks like this was fixed in v23.2, despite the misleading title of the
bug. I will also notify the Fedora team now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806060
Title:
Newer versions of ki
Note: Looks like this is present in Fedora as well, do I need to report
this upstream somehow as well?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806060
Title:
Newer versions of killall (Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Newer versions of killall (Ubuntu 18.04+) display usage when the signal
is passed like:
killall -INT
and instead require it to be passed as:
killall -int
In previous versions from Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04, this doesn't happen.
Is this a bug or a feature change? If so perha
** Package changed: lshw (Ubuntu) => lshw
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1749580
Title:
Weird behaviour with hybrid MBRs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
Public bug reported:
Occurs with: B.02.17 on Ubuntu 16.04, and also other versions (don't
know which exactly, but affects every version I've tried this on over
the years).
Seems to affect the lshw program on other Linux distros too. I tried
reporting on https://www.ezix.org/project/wiki/HardwareL
** Changed in: unity
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1275076
Title:
pkexec cann
No this doesn't seem to happen any more in 12.04, and I recall it
working correctly with 14.04 and onwards.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1275076
Title:
pkexec cannot be used in Unit
Sorry, but I don't have the knowledge to help you any further.
I'm not sure about open shot 2 either, as it's now a year behind,
and even though I was going to help develop it, it was never in a good enough
state for me to build it,
and there's been no activity for a few months, unfortunately.
Ho
This is a wierd one...
It seems you upgraded to trusty (14.04) via precise (12.04), which may mean
there is some crud left over on your system that is causing this problem,
although it's hard to say.
This might not get fixed, because of the new openshot 2.0 coming up (hopefully)
soon, so hopeful
Does this still occur in new versions of openshot and Ubuntu?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922196
Title:
openshot cuts off the last second of video when exporting to bluray
To mana
** Project changed: unity => unity (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1275076
Title:
pkexec cannot be used in Unity!
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
Probably because 10.04 is out of support and no one's been able to
reproduce it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543059
Title:
openshot crashed with AttributeError in on_btnCancel_clic
Additional information found: The progress bar moves as expect until
dpkg starts processing triggers. Then the bar is completely still,
therefore the progress bar for update-manager may have some code missing
from it. This does not occour when performing operations with the
Synaptic Package Manager
It may be helpful if an attempt to reproduce this was made. Even though
this is unimportant, it makes Ubuntu look a little rough around the
edges.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169691
Public bug reported:
All updates apply successfully, but the progress bar doesn't reach the
right. My ubuntu version is precsie, running on an emachines er1402 from
2011.
Output of lsb_release -rd:
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS
Release:12.04
Output of apt-cache policy update-manage
67 matches
Mail list logo
