This is fixed Ubuntu 16.10, haven't investigated where the fix came
from.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592434
Title:
ssh -X user@machine hangs when using exit to terminate
To manag
Still Reproducible in: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+
a8835936e9d3e19443c63b7b365174254741cf76
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126858
Title:
Search and replace, with tracked changes on, changing on
> Sounds like bug 76238 has proposed a similar remedy. Perhaps one of these
> two should be closed as a dupe of the other?
>
> Status -> NEEDINFO
I'm fine with that solution, not sure which one to keep open though..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 81806 ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350369
Title:
[Upstream] soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in _SaveBox::CreateNew()
To man
Submitted a fix in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/10735/
My testing was run libreoffice --impress in the following scenarios:
daemon off
daemon on - just disable-publishing=yes
daemon on - just disable-user-service-publishing=yes
daemon on - publishing enabled, check to make sure it works
--
Created attachment 103851
incomplete avahi fix
I fixed the original issue by just checking if(client). However it
seems like the issue goes deeper.
Current error is - soffice.bin: thread-watch.c:132:
avahi_threaded_poll_start: Assertion `!p->thread_running' failed. If a
return statement is adde
Alright so I was wrong on the last count it's actually.
-> SearchCell -> The last else statement -> aCol[nCol].SetString(nRow, nTab,
aString, pDocument->GetAddressConvention());
-> aNewCell.release(*this, nRow); (In SetString, column3.cxx)
-> ScCellValue::release (cellvalue.cxx), it falls to defa
I believe the issue was introduced specifically in this commit (by Kohei
Yoshida):
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/sc/source/core/data/column3.cxx?id=c008dc483f8c6840803983e7e351cec6fdd32070
Specifically in the need to change how "Delete" works.
--
You received this bug noti
This call in (table6.cxx)
aCol[nCol].SetString(nRow, nTab, aString, pDocument->GetAddressConvention());
is very slow, and appears to be further to the cause...
Also in a ReplaceAll, for an reason I don't understand SetString is also called
somewhere here:
ScAddress aAdr( nCol, nRow, nTab );
aC
My tests indicate the slowdown is in the bool ScTable::Search function
(or in how it's called) in sc/source/core/data/table6.cxx. When
comparing the speed of the function with FindAll vs ReplaceAll the
performance for Replace All starts at about 141 times the Find all. By
the end of the search t
Closing cause I switched video cards.. and it seems like the system
requirements for NS2 were higher than an HD 3870 anyway.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289860
Title:
compiz crash
I haven't been able to get it ever working on this card. It's a RV670
Radeon HD 3870.
Prior to this most recent build it only worked with 3.1 Compatibility
profile, not core. So this is the first NS2 build it could have worked
on.
I was not succesful getting it to work on fglrx legacy driver ei
Well according to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/19.0/system-
requirements/ the actual GTK requirements are at 2.18 or higher. Which
does already push us to Ubuntu 10.04+, Debian Squeeze+, and to RHEL 6+.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
(In reply to Chris Pearce (:cpearce) from comment #19)
> We talked about this in Auckland, and we'd prefer to use our existing
> built-in backends for Ogg and WebM, since they've been fuzz tested and we
> know they're reliable.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but are there outstanding exploits th
Are there plans to enable this in Linux builds? Should that be a
separate Mozilla bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412647
Title:
Firefox is not able to play mp4 tags
To manage n
This can be closed, they use a different system for resumes than they did then.
(I'm the original reporter)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304221
Title:
Canonical Recruitment: Unable
16 matches
Mail list logo
