Hi,
kernel works fine with the patch on IPv6.
Thanks
** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1605494
Title:
Installed it and speed is on par with IPv4 now.
Thanks for the quick response, much appreciated.
One question though, will the manual installation of this version get in
the way of kernel updates or will it pick them up again if a newer one
than 113 comes out?
Have a nice weekend!
--
You recei
Made an error in my previous comment, it's the other way around between
16.04 and 12.04.
Downloading on a 16.04 *from* a 12.04 goes fine (mostly TX for the
12.04). Downloading on 12.04 from 16.04 (or anything else) is horrible
(mostly RX for 12.04).
Any incoming IPv6 on the 12.04's is rather bad
Hi,
having similar issues with 12.04 (with both trusty and precise kernels).
Don't see any fixes for the trusty kernel. Tried adding trusty, but
launchpad gives an oops when I try to.
We have several webservers with IPv6 directly attached to internet. 2
12.04's both running with trusty kernel no
Recently migrating from 12.04 through 12.10 and 13.04 : Bug encountered
with each version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241844
Title:
Cannot see Philips SHB 9100 headset
To manage
Affects 13.04 too.
What does it take to get it fixed? It's only a small python script,
looking at this bug takes more time than fixing it for someone with the
proper access.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
What does it take to get a response here?
This doesn't really make me confident about Ubuntu on servers. Any
response - including we don't care - would have been better than utter
silence.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Buffered fileio mode is not saved properly by the current targetcli
version which causes the setting to be lost upon reboot.
Please see the relevant iscsi-target list thread for the fix:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi.target.devel/3209
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRe
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050841
Title:
PowerDNS binds to webserver port whilst disabled
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/
Public bug reported:
When the webserver option for monitoring is disabled the port is still
claimed. One can connect to it, but it doesn't seem to respond (tried
GET / HTTP/1.0\n\n\n and GET / HTTP/1.1\nHost: localhost\n\n\n - no
response in either case).
Got from the IRC channel that it's a know
** Summary changed:
- Issues with SQL table creation
+ PowerDNS - Issues with SQL table creation
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050829
Title:
PowerDNS - Issues with SQL table creati
Public bug reported:
Hi,
found some issues setting up PowerDNS with MySQL backend. There's a
script to create the tables located at /usr/share/dbconfig-common/data
/pdns-backend-mysql/install/mysql
This script has several issues:
1) It contains type=InnoDB for some tables (doesn't specify engin
PS do note I did check a while ago at home on my desktop and on my
laptop, my laptop reports 32767 for my Vertex 3 SSD as
max_hw_sectors_kb, don't recall the exact number from my home computer
but that had a nice multiple of MiB's instead of N*MiB - 1 kiB. This
doesn't seem to be consistent thus ei
Hi, I've tested with 3.5 (it's still running). Took another one than the
one you linked, as you linked -rc7 and the official release was on the
site too (so just 3.5.0 no rc/prerelease). It seems somewhat resolved
(note - I'm no kernel dev ;). With that I mean the values are much
higher now, howeve
Hi, I will test with the requested 3.5 kernel shortly.
As already stated however I've found posts on, iirc, the kernel mailing
list where a user stated he resolved the problem by upgrading his kernel
to 3.3 vanilla.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
After talking in #ubuntu-server I also got a report from a guy that he
has the same issue in 10.04 with the 2.6.32 kernel. Apparently has been
around for a while thus.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031260
Title:
RAID write performance is horrible. max_sectors_kb is set to the odd
value of 127
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
Public bug reported:
RAID-5/6 write performance utterly sucks. Initially we were on RAID-6,
since RAID write performance was really really poor I converted it to
RAID-5. This only took around 9 days...
After I pointed out write performance was bad on the LIO mailing list
(export it as iSCSI volum
Public bug reported:
walking my first steps with LIO, moving away from IET and running into
an issue.
Rather than have several MD devices created out of partitions, we did
the reverse. Added entire disks to MD and partitioned the MD set,
resulting in device like /dev/md4p1, /dev/md4p2, etc.
Whil
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021785
Title:
targetcli does not recognize md partitions as block devices
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
Public bug reported:
Actually more of a feature request. FreeRDP (freerdp.sf.net) seems to
develop much quicker and is more feature complete than rdesktop. Could
you switch to it? RemoteFX amongst other things is in development and
has code in git now. rdesktop seems to be near dead concerning
dev
FYI todays daily build is faster. Now just have to pray it's stable :)
r...@datavault:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md4 bs=4M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 19.9163 s, 216 MB/s
r...@datavault:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md4 bs=4M count=10240
10240+0 r
FYI,
we've been running with the 2.6.37 release candidate kernel for some
time now.
It seems to be stable (no issues so far with 8 x 2TB RAID-6 (mdadm)).
It's slow as hell though. We get about 60MB/s write (sequential) on
average. It sometimes peaks to ~300MB/s for a short period. In the
beginnin
Hi,
I've been in contact with Manoj through IRC. He advised me to try the
latest 2.6.37 release candicate kernel.
So far it seems to be a huge improvement. I've run several disks on the
machine with this kernel and had bonnie++ running on them several days
(in md raid 1).
What is odd is that the
It seems to be stable for a longer period, but it has borked out now.
As stated the issue seems way more frequent (if not only occuring) when
using md raid (and from what I saw from posts also when using xfs).
The array here has failed now with these messages:
[458706.767334] mvsas :02:00.0:
If this is the right GIT tree to look at for current kernel:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
maverick.git;a=blob;f=drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c;h=8c496b56556ce232cbbe2dc1832b8cafbf2d1fbc;hb=75b2c7ec81606406b0ac2cba8ea54d2d4c8117ee
The patch I linked to isn't included. There were sev
It might be worth noting that the issues with mvsas / SATA disks are
especially notable with md raid sets. Also from what I've seen in posts
XFS filesystem on the drives (when they're not in raid) seems to trigger
the issue a lot.
Anyways my question basically is 2 folded:
I'd like to know what p
Issues with mvsas and SATA drivers (at least not one of the brands I
currently have attached) are unfortunately not solved.
I figured I'd upgrade the server from 10.04 LTS to 10.10 after seeing
josh.k.abbott's message.
As stated/guessed by someone earlier, the issues are indeed NOT ubuntu
specifi
28 matches
Mail list logo
