i have a thinkpad p16v2 in 24.04 with Intel 915 after a minimal time of
use, he freeze, i have test with 6.11.0-17 kernel, 6.8.0-41 and 6.8.0-54
kernel, and many 6.5.x but all freeze i have format and install 22.04
with 6.8.40 this fresh install (without update)and any freeze in 2h of
use !
--
Yo
I installed the package from noble-proposed (0.9.8-1ubuntu0.1).
It fixes the bug in my use case ("-n -o
session.path.set=$HOME/.cache/rtorrent/vm" options).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
I'm facing the same crash when I use the "-s" option of rtorrent on
Ubuntu 24.04.
So I tried to recompile the package after applyng the patch from
upstream suggested in the original post. It fixes the crash.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I made an Ubuntu update this week and now my laptop is able to connect
to my Orbi access point.
Maybe this one ?
Start-Date: 2024-03-13 06:52:44
Commandline: apt-get upgrade
Requested-By: fred (1000)
Upgrade: dpkg:amd64 (1.21.1ubuntu2.2, 1.21.1ubuntu2.3), libcups2:amd64
(2.4.1op1-1ubuntu4.7, 2.
** Package changed: ubuntu => network-manager (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055124
Title:
WiFi adapter cannot get IP configuration from Netgear orbi RBR20
To manage notifi
Public bug reported:
Since a recent Ubuntu update (~6 weeks ago), my laptop cannot connect
anymore to my Netgear Orbi RBR20 WiFi access point.
The wifi connection is still working fine with my Android smartphone set
as a WiFi access point.
My other devices can connect successfully to the Orbi RB
Yes. That solved my problem.
Thank you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969593
Title:
rules to prevent non-root users from rebooting not taken into account
To manage notifications ab
Additional information.
Reboot is not authorized when the (non-root) user is connected via SSH. We got
the following message:
$ reboot
Failed to set wall message, ignoring: Interactive authentication required.
Failed to reboot system via logind: Access denied
Failed to open initctl fifo: Permiss
Public bug reported:
Hi,
capnproto 0.8.0-2ubuntu1 fails on ppc64el :
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/capnproto/0.8.0-2ubuntu1/+build/23090234/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-ppc64el.capnproto_0.8.0-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
Lowering optimization (O3->O2) level makes the failing test pass, for
i
I confirm this bug is still active on firefox
92.0+build3-0ubuntu0.21.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913775
Title:
Copy from Firefox Wayland fails to be pasted anywhere else
To
Ok so since gcc-11, it won't pass tests with -O3, neither O2.
Got it work with O1.
```
export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -O3
export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -O1
```
As it worked fine as is with gcc-10 on Impish, I guess it's definitely
something for the toolchain team.
--
You received this bu
7 years later, I have this bug in Hirsute ! (or at least the same symptoms: I
click on a mailto link and a window named “close Thunderbird” appears, with the
message :
“Thunderbird is already running, but is not responding. To use Thunderbird, you
must first close the existing Thunderbird proces
update works with Synaptic.
Packages updated by Synaptic :
gnome-control-center (1:3.36.5-0ubuntu1) to 1:3.36.5-0ubuntu2
gnome-control-center-data (1:3.36.5-0ubuntu1) to 1:3.36.5-0ubuntu2
gnome-control-center-faces (1:3.36.5-0ubuntu1) to 1:3.36.5-0ubuntu2
grub-common (2.04-1ubuntu26.11) to 2.04-1ub
Public bug reported:
update-manager displays a false grub2 dependency error :
"Impossible de résoudre les dépendances du paquet
grub-efi-amd64-signed: Depends: grub2-common (>= 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.31) mais
la version 2.04-1ubuntu26.11 va être installée"
It should not display this error, since 2.
That would be nice!
What is the rational behind the choice of not enabling wifi for instance ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925335
Title:
subiquity installer : ibmveth disabled by
Public bug reported:
Hi,
on PowerVM, when installing a ppc64el LPAR (P8, P9, P10) with an ibmveth
network interface,
this one is disabled by default even if it works and has a working DHCP server
entry leading
subiquity installer to propose to "Continue without network" whereas it
actually has
skiboot.lid is available on all architectures as part of qemu-system-data
package which is "all", not ppc specific.
The latter is pulled by the binary package qemu-system-ppc, so no particular
action is needed.
---
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu 5.4.0-72-generic #80-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 12
en it did the job !
When I resumed the unit and his subordinated charm, juju reported it as
"active/idle" and on the unit the "designate-producer.service" is
"Active: active (running)" and no problem remains, all packages are up
to date...
I hope it will help anybo
Public bug reported:
Problem occured when I tried ton install on a fresh disk a new ubuntu
desktop from my current ubuntu desktop running.
I did a custom disk partition instead replace my existing system
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubiquity 20.04.15.2
ProcVersionSignatu
I found a partial workaround to this problem:
The solution has been tested under Ubuntu 14.04 and should work also on
more recent versions of Ubuntu.
This solution works only for the cheap Teac USB floppy controllers (for
other usb controllers you will maybe have to adapt the solution
yourself):
This was fixed upstream by linking to a copy on archive.org instead.
Until a future 1.10.3 release comes along, maybe Ubuntu might want to
backport this patch?
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/commit/05082ae12051821b1d969e6672d9e4e5afe1bc07
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/commit/b756c8cdebc4ab6
Small update on this.
Not sure I should have close that bug in my latest upload in Debian, but
with 1.0.15, libdfp has support for i386 and amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809098
Public bug reported:
Hello,
I run Ubuntu 20.04 LTS on my Acer Aspire E5-573G and Ubuntu can't found my
bluetooth device.
I have a QCNFA335 (QCA9565) which can normally support both wifi and
bluetooth
I can use both wifi and bluetooth on windows 10.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Hi,
I'm a beginner in GRUB2 and for my use i need to have BIOS information
to test the model of hardware i'm uses and fix kernel parameters.
I'm working on Debian Jessie. I have downloaded latest sources of GRUB
(2.04) and install it correctly. But smbios module is not present, how
can i include
Public bug reported:
While deploying the package no header files are installed in
/usr/include
Going to the source of the package and using their source zip it appears the
Makefile / ubuntu build process is incomplete and buggy (looks like the lib is
mainly maintained for windows).
To alleviate
@ Jason Hobbs: The solution you gave doesn't work for me:
```
> systemctl show snapd.service | grep -i proxy
DropInPaths=/etc/systemd/system/snapd.service.d/override.conf
/etc/systemd/system/snapd.service.d/snap_proxy.conf
> cat /etc/systemd/system/snapd.service.d/snap_proxy.conf
[Service]
Enviro
Interesting, that very same iso works well on P8 and I tried on a P9
(witherspoon) vm and didn't have any issue.
I don't have access to RaptorCS machines, though I don't get what could be
related to the hardware given the type of error at that point
Could you attach some more logs : /var/log/sysl
Hi Franck,
which iso URL did you use ?
On which machine ? baremetal, vm, LPAR ?
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840580
Title:
19.04 server powerpc64-el Installer fails at base-ins
Thanks Thadeu, good to know the problem has been identified !
I'll be happy to test the fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726
Title:
Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing
a fully working certificate, on Disco with proposed package, dns domain
changed to exemple.com
root@test2:~# /usr/bin/dehydrated -c -t dns-01 -k
/etc/dehydrated/remote_dns_hook.sh
# INFO: Using main config file /etc/dehydrated/config
# INFO: Using additional config file /etc/dehydrated/conf.d/con
-
fresh disco install:
-
root@test2:~# uname -a
Linux test2 4.15.0-64-generic #73-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 12 13:16:13 UTC 2019
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@test2:~# cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=19.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=disco
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
verification-needed-disco
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic
** Tags added: verification-needed-disco
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Freshly installed bionic
root@test:~# uname -a
Linux test 4.15.0-64-generic #73-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 12 13:16:13 UTC 2019 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@test:~# cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=18.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=bioni
The fix is in 5.3.0-12.13 but trying current
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/eoan-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/netboot/mini.iso
(2019-09-21 81M, 3ed00b52f4335c589f4e1b070107c1af mini.iso)
the kernel of the installer just panics without much details...
Preparing to b
OK, I missed the fact that a release manager needed to approve, before a
new package would be generated/published.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841619
Title:
dehydrated: Mi
This is a real BUG fixed in 0.6.2-2.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934039
It impact any fresh install of 18.04, trying to run dehydrated as well:
Same error as Debian Bug report logs - #934039
On Ubuntu 18.04 dehydrated is stuck in version 0.6.1-2
Let's encrypt production API
When you ran your"Test Case" did you first run ?
/usr/bin/dehydrated --register --accept-terms
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841619
Title:
dehydrated: Missing ID field for new regis
Thanks Seth, I'll test this as soon as it's released.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726
Title:
Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram
To manage notification
Public bug reported:
Same error as Debian Bug report logs - #934039
On Ubuntu 18.04 dehydrated is stuck in version 0.6.1-2
Bug fixed upstream in 0.6.2-2
** Affects: dehydrated (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
apport-collect is not available from the installation iso shell
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726
Title:
Ins
Public bug reported:
Hi,
since eoan and kernel 5.2, the installation fails when installing grub at the
end.
Actually /dev/nvram does not exist.
nvram support was previously built in the kernel and is now built as a module,
and the module is not shipped within the iso or in udebs.
This is probably
Hi,
what I know from the upstream is that libdfp is work in progress on x86 32b/64b.
So as the Debian package maintainer of libdfp, I don't intend to add other
architectures than the one well supported.
In Debian, libdfp is also compiled on powerpc and ppc64.
So no other arch is planned to be adde
Reassigning to qtdeclarative-opensource-src; I'll let them confirm in
which version the fix was introduced.
** Package changed: twinkle (Ubuntu) => qtdeclarative-opensource-src
(Ubuntu)
** Also affects: twinkle (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notifi
** Bug watch added: github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues #9
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/9
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131161
Title:
Adaptive jitter buffer
To manage n
Thank you very much for the backtrace.
It would appear this is actually a bug within Qt (libqt5qml5 from the
looks of it). I managed to find a KDE bug[1] with a similar backtrace,
and their conclusion was the same (though they pointed to QtQuick as the
culprit). In any case, I have reassigned th
** Package changed: twinkle (Ubuntu) => qtdeclarative-opensource-src
(Ubuntu)
** Also affects: twinkle (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** No longer affects: twinkle-sip-client
** Bug watch removed: github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues #157
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/157
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18249
** Also affects: twinkle-sip-client via
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/157
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824986
Title:
twi
This would appear to be a (now resolved) Qt bug, specifically
QTBUG-48391[1]. The backtrace here (35 frames of Qt on top of Twinkle's
run() method) looks eerily identical to the one in QTBUG-48391 (save for
two extra frames at the top in our case). For the record, the fix[2]
seems to have made it
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1603988 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603988
Looking at the backtrace, this is a duplicate of #1603988.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1603988
twinkle terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::logic_error'
--
You receiv
Hi, Twinkle upstream co-maintainer here. If you could, please open an
issue on our GitHub tracker[1], along with a backtrace[2]. (The strace
attachment was appreciated, but it didn't really help in this case,
unfortunately.) Thanks!
[1] https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues
[2] https://githu
Hi, Twinkle upstream co-maintainer here. This issue has been filed on
our GitHub tracker[1], and we have a pending pull request which fixes
it[2].
[1] https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/88
[2] https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/pull/150
To summarize, this issue arises when two user profile
Hi, Twinkle upstream co-maintainer here. This issue has been filed on
our GitHub tracker[1], and we have a pending pull request which fixes
it[2].
[1] https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/121
[2] https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/pull/149
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
VanillaMozilla: If Twinkle fails to run even with a valid profile, this
is a different matter, and you should definitely file a new bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533561
Title:
Hi, Twinkle upstream co-maintainer here. That's a very good point,
Rolf, so I have opened a corresponding issue for this at
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/156. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Hi, Twinkle upstream co-maintainer here. If this bug is still present,
please open an issue on our GitHub tracker at
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
** Bug watch added: github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues #156
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/156
** Also affects: twinkle-sip-client via
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/156
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Bug watch added: github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues #88
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/88
** Also affects: twinkle-sip-client via
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/88
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Bug watch added: github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues #121
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/121
** Also affects: twinkle-sip-client via
https://github.com/LubosD/twinkle/issues/121
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hi all,
bug #1785081 was not mirrored completely for some reason and I'm working
on fixing this : it's just about the bug happening on 18.04 specifically
kernel 4.15.0-26. Sorry for the lag.
Also, on ppc64el, RHEL 7.5 with a 4.14 kernel uses deadline, so I guess it's
not a completely unsafe path
Hi,
the log file mode is dealt with by logrotate. So restarting opal-prd won't make
logrotate start and change anything (logrotate is called from crontab). The
test case would rather be :
[Test Case]
- install fixed version of opal-prd package
- stop opal-prd daemon : sudo systemctl stop opal-pr
Public bug reported:
Crash after using snap for update the OS.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: base-files 9.4ubuntu4.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-1028.31-oem 4.13.16
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-1028-oem x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18
AptdaemonVersion: 1.1.1+bz
Thanks a lot Steve!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790601
Title:
Ubuntu18.10 - Update libocxl to version 1.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Nevertheless, I've upgraded libocxl to 1.1 in Debian Unstable since
linux 4.18 reached Unstable on September 6th.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790601
Title:
Ubuntu18.10 - Updat
Hi,
this should be done since version 6.0.1-6 :
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-6.0/1:6.0.1-6
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784213
Title:
lld missing on ppc
Dimitri, we've synced the other bug 1785081 that is probably the same
issue as this one.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709889
Title:
Ubuntu 17.04: Bug in cfq scheduler, I/Os do
Fixed in skiboot-6.1-2 (Debian/Unstable).
You may use the same fix for 18.04 there :
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/skiboot/commit/0e6ac150e51a0e7b3701acf78c311709b6336d58
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
Łukasz, Adam, thanks a lot for your help.
I don't know if Abdul tested Ubuntu's build but he did test successfully
with a build I did last week, when debian-installer was no yet rebuilt
on Ubuntu's side. Indeed that made sense on hwe which he tested ok.
Thanks for taking this pro-actively in 16.0
Hi,
the packaging I pushed in Debian was accepted by ftpmasters into unstable and
synced to 18.10/universe.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771813
Title:
[Ubuntu 18.10 FEAT] new
Public bug reported:
I’ve upgraded a server to bionic beaver, and it couldn’t boot anymore.
Using the “recovery boot” option hanged a long time with the message
"waiting for resume device".
Some googling lead be to the bug #206358, and I deduced that do-release-
upgrade “messed with my swap” (as
** Also affects: df-libreoffice via
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100158
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727958
Ti
** Description changed:
Hi,
I did a really small patch for xrdp upstream. It was pulled and merged in
version 0.9.6.
Debian as just accepted 0.9.6 in buster (testing).
I understand you will not update to 0.9.6 for the 18.04 LTS, but could
you import my patch in current 0.9.5 it has n
** Description changed:
- Hi,
+ Hi,
I did a really small patch for xrdp upstream. It was pulled and merged in
version 0.9.6.
Debian as just accepted 0.9.6 in buster (testing).
I understand you will not update to 0.9.6 for the 18.04 LTS, but could
you import my patch in current 0.9.5 i
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I did a really small patch for xrdp upstream. It was pulled and merged in
version 0.9.6.
Debian as just accepted 0.9.6 in buster (testing).
I understand you will not update to 0.9.6 for the 18.04 LTS, but could
you import my patch in current 0.9.5 it has no impact whatso
A detailed answer to this problem is provided here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg131388.html
In summary, these "complex" webcams need drivers both in kernel space and user
space, and it will take some time before they are supported under linux.
If ubuntu devs can help to speed up
** Also affects: wayland (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513160
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1724977
Title:
Hi Dimitri,
I did the test with the netboot vmlinux/initrd.gz from xenial-proposed and
'apt-setup/proposed=true'
and it worked :
---
ubuntu@garri:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS
Release:16.04
Codename: xenial
Hi Dimitri,
hard to say, but this is taken into account :
https://github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues/15
F.
** Bug watch added: github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues #15
https://github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues/15
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Hi Manoj, the patches that fixed this issue are the 3 listed above in my
comment :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1739498/comments/6
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
After some research, it seems the webcams depend on a new intel driver which
will be released in kernel 4.16:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg122619.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
Public bug reported:
I installed ubuntu 17.10 on a Dell latitude 5285 detachable laptop.
Unfortunately, the webcams (both rear and front) do not work.
There is no /dev/video* file.
I tried upgrading the kernel to version 4.14 and 4.15rc3, but the problem is
still there.
Below are my lsusb and lsp
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu dock in 17.10 has a fixed size, that you can configure manually.
As a consequence, if you exceed the number of visible icons, further icons are
hidden and it is quite awkward/difficult to make them visible.
I would recommend an option for automatic size, as is the case
Hi again,
I tested the latest netboot installer there
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/xenial-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/hwe-netboot/ubuntu-installer/ppc64el/
and it worked perfectly.
Thanks,
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Hi Steve,
sorry for the delay, I've been afk. I'll check this today and let you know.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715101
Title:
Xenial : installer fails on POWER9
To manage no
Hi Vasant,
does that mean that we don't need to run vpdupdate on both, installation of a
new package, and upgrade of the package ?
If so, what is vpdupdate binary needed for ? Do we still need to keep it
packaged ?
Regards,
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Thanks Vasant for double checking the fix.
The patch is in ppc64-diag 2.7.4-2 in Unstable.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715397
Title:
systemd 234-2ubuntu9 ADT test failure with
Hi there,
I upgraded ppc64-diag to 2.7.4 in Debian Unstable.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708494
Title:
Update Package request for ppc64-diag
To manage notifications about thi
Public bug reported:
Hi,
could you please update the installer to use linux-hwe version >=
4.10.0-29 for POWER9 on Xenial.
At the moment the kernel/vmlinux in
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/xenial-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/hwe-netboot/ubuntu-installer/ppc64el/
** Tags added: i386
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709885
Title:
package libxfont1-dev (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/libxfont-dev/f
Hello,
di the install test on i386 arch, and it's working as well.
libxfont1-dev (1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.2) installs cleanly alongside
libxfont-dev (1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
I guess this bug corresponds to the one reported and corrected here
https://github.com/tomboy-notes/tomboy/issues/45
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307198
Title:
Notes with high bit c
I confirm the bug is still valid for Tomboy 1.15.7, shipped with Ubuntu
17.04
** Bug watch added: github.com/tomboy-notes/tomboy/issues #45
https://github.com/tomboy-notes/tomboy/issues/45
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
A previous Ubuntu upgrade made me change from SCIM to iBus, so I can’t really
test.
I did not manage to reinstall SCIM on 17.04. However, looking into the the file
/usr/share/scim/tables/LaTeX.bin leads me to the conclusion that \bot and \top
are now correct (for scim-tables-additional/zesty,ze
I confirm this now works for me
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643184
Title:
The ripole package installs the doc, but not the software itself
To manage notifications about this bug
Could you review this rollback patch ?
Thanks
** Patch added: "partman-auto-fix-baremetal-ppc64el.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1689829/+attachment/4875551/+files/partman-auto-fix-baremetal-ppc64el.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Public bug reported:
Hi,
on ppc64el, using autopartitioning with LVM, the system will install but after
rebooting petitboot won't find the /boot content that is on LVM, because
petitboot doesn't handle LVM yet.
So the system will not be bootable.
The changes that cause this are in the following
This is fixed in Debian Unstable but due to the freeze in Ubuntu, it was
not synced to Zesty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549098
Title:
Systemd init script does not pass --pnor
T
Yep! working on ubuntu 16.04.2 now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609700
Title:
username is not saved in openconnect connection dialog
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Freeze still occurs after installed linux-image-4.4.0-67-generic and
linux-image-extra-4.4.0-67-generic from proposed.
Are they correct packages to test?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Hi Steve,
indeed, not all the machines would be concerned, even if the daemon won't be
loaded as it already does
this check itself, which is why I was not sure to do the check at install time
or later by the daemon itself.
It's better though to target only the specific configuration.
The criteria
1 - 100 of 606 matches
Mail list logo