Proposed description, drawing from previous comments, Danny Piccirillo's
draft in Bug #332371 [1] and Empathy documentation:
Empathy Instant Messenger
IM with your friends
Instant messaging program supporting text, voice, video, file
transfers and inter-application communication over many d
2009/7/17 David Stansby :
> What is the point in epiphany-browser if it's just a dummy package that
> depends on one other package? Unless it is a metapackage (with plans to
> make it depend on more packages in the future) then surely we could just
> get rid of epiphany-browser and make packages de
2009/7/17 David Stansby :
> What is the point in epiphany-browser if it's just a dummy package that
> depends on one other package? Unless it is a metapackage (with plans to
> make it depend on more packages in the future) then surely we could just
> get rid of epiphany-browser and make packages de
Presuming there is more or less consensus on Jonathan Marsden's (a), I'm
setting the status of this bug report to Invalid. If there are
objections, speak up and revert the status!
** Changed in: sed (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
sed -i option needs clarification in manpage
https:
s/original maintainer/mantainer/
--
epiphany-browser should depend on epiphany-browser-data (purge problem)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313690
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
This does seem to be a strange issue, but it may be more complex than
this bug report suggests.
First of all, it's important to note that epiphany-browser is actually a
dummy package that depends on epiphany-gecko [1]. epiphany-gecko in turn
carries epiphany-browser-data as one of its dependencies
Hi Micah, I've upgraded to Jaunty since reporting this bug, so I can no
longer test it under the same circumstances. What I can confirm is that
I no longer experience the problem under the new dependencies, which is
a good sign. Perhaps it was simply the outdated package as you
suspected... can any
I'm changing the status of this report to Confirmed because it appears
to catalogue a real bug and carry sufficient detail. At the same time, a
couple possibly important pieces of information (i.e. the full backtrace
and *~/.xsession-errors) have still not been included; hopefully Szilárd
Páll can
Hi again, Szilárd. According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Reporting, X
lockup reports require some additional information not yet included
here. You've already provided a detailed description of the problem,
version information, the clearest steps for reproduction that you have
available and your /
Hi again, Nicklas. I just realized that my system is handling this
differently from the way you described, and that my previous
confirmation was probably a mistake. You said:
> If mouse keys accessibility featured is turned on for the keyboard,
activating the numpad's regular behavior through num
Hi Szilárd Páll, thank you for taking the time to report this bug, and
for helping to make Ubuntu better. Your report did not specify an
associated package, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked
at by the proper developers. (You can learn more about how to find the
right package at ht
I can confirm this bug for xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu18 and GNOME 2.26.1 on a
Dell Inspiron 1520 laptop running Ubuntu 9.04 with Linux kernel
2.6.28-12-generic.
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Numpad unusable even with numlock if mouse keys are enabled
https://bugs.launch
Hi Nicklas, thank you for taking the time to report this bug, and for
helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug report did not come with an
associated package, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked
at by the proper developers. (You can learn more about how to find the
right package at h
** Package changed: ubuntu => xorg (Ubuntu)
--
Numpad unusable even with numlock if mouse keys are enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371282
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
Hi Damien, thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping
to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with
it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper
developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at
https://wiki.ubun
** Package changed: ubuntu => firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
--
firefox and gdebi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371266
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
16 matches
Mail list logo
