[Bug 2054810] Re: Adding bpf to CONFIG_LSM in linux kernel

2024-09-13 Thread Eric Sheridan
Hi Brian / Magali - makes sense re: not supporting Ubuntu Mantic given its EOL. What about the LTS distros, such as those used by cloud providers per my recent messages? Any progress on or anything we can do to help with getting ",bpf" added to "CONFIG_LSM"? -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2054810] Re: Adding bpf to CONFIG_LSM in linux kernel

2024-05-18 Thread Eric Sheridan
Hi Joseph - I just wanted to check in and see how things are going. Is there anything I can do to help? Happy to test out some kernel builds if needed. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 2054810] Re: Adding bpf to CONFIG_LSM in linux kernel

2024-04-17 Thread Eric Sheridan
Joseph - thanks for looking into this. Please let me know if I can be of assistance. I'd be happy to test out the corresponding changes on my end. Just let me know - thank you!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 2054810] Re: Adding bpf to CONFIG_LSM in linux kernel

2024-04-08 Thread Eric Sheridan
Can Ubuntu please consider addressing this as a part of the upcoming 24 LTS release? The ability to leverage LSM based BPF programs on Ubuntu out-of-the-box (ie. without having to update grub and rebooting) opens the door to a growing ecosystem of security tooling. There are major computing environ