I think editing the systemwide template should be discouraged. Is it perhaps an
issue of
the linux-image-unsigned-XXX package? Shouldn't it simply Provide
linux-image-XXX?
I am also not sure why some arch specific builds (e.g., amd64, arm64) have an
-unsigned binary
package and other don't (e.g
Public bug reported:
Using latest kernel mainline build, e.g. [1], the binary package generated with
`dkms mkbmdeb`
fails to be installed since it depends on linux-image-XXX but only
linux-image-unsigned-XXX is available (which by the way conflicts with
linux-image-XXX).
It seems that the `/e
