[Bug 1960749] Re: dpkg incorrectly installs singular-doc in jammy Docker container

2022-02-14 Thread Dima Pasechnik
All these links points to names like foobar.png, but what's important that they point to locations excluded by the policy (actually, the same directory where the links reside!). As long as the policy is in force, nothing can be installed to locations they point to - besides more broken links, of c

[Bug 1960749] Re: dpkg incorrectly installs singular-doc in jammy Docker container

2022-02-14 Thread Dima Pasechnik
In this case the links are not pointing to directories, they are pointing to files in the same directory. So there is no excuse to install them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960749 T

[Bug 1960749] Re: dpkg incorrectly installs singular-doc in jammy Docker container

2022-02-14 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Sure, when I was filing the report I had no idea what's really going on - the only indications were `dpkg -V` reporting missing files, and broken links in /usr/share/doc. ** Description changed: Also reported on https://github.com/tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu- core/issues/230 Using official

[Bug 1960749] Re: dpkg incorrectly installs singular-doc in jammy Docker container

2022-02-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
And if you want to keep this behaviour, at least make sure `dpkg -V` reports that files are missing due to a policy, not cause it's a bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960749 Title:

[Bug 1960749] Re: dpkg incorrectly installs singular-doc in jammy Docker container

2022-02-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
This was discovered during the run of a CI, and interactive steps are provided for the ease of reproduction, not because it's the way it was found. If you don't know how to use Docker images interactively, it doesn't mean they are not used this way. Also, even if I'd agree that Docker containers a

[Bug 1960749] [NEW] dpkg incorrectly installs singular-doc in jammy Docker container

2022-02-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Public bug reported: Also reported on https://github.com/tianon/docker-brew-ubuntu- core/issues/230 Using official Jammy image in Docker (macOS) and Podman (Fedora). In both cases, using CLI in the image and running apt install singular-doc dpkg -V singular-doc reports a lot of missing files. In

[Bug 1960749] Re: dpkg incorrectly installs singular-doc in jammy Docker container

2022-02-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
What's unusual about singular-doc_4.2.1-p3+ds-1_all.deb ? I suppose * data.tar is compressed using zst * it contains symbolic links within the tarball. The data.tar.zst tarball extracted from .deb works fine in Docker image CLI (assuming zstd is installed), so I presume it's something to do with

[Bug 1897371] Re: don't ship libgc with -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions

2020-09-26 Thread Dima Pasechnik
** Description changed: - This option leads to various issues, see the upstream discussion on + This option leads to various issues, see the upstream discussion on https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/issues/321 Steps to reproduction are given there. We ran into it in Sagemath, see https://tra

[Bug 1897371] [NEW] don't ship libgc with -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions

2020-09-26 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Public bug reported: This option leads to various issues, see the upstream discussion on https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/issues/321 Steps to reproduction are given there. We ran into it in Sagemath, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30629 Basically, ecl built with this libgc is broken. ** Aff

[Bug 713985] Re: [armel] Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM

2014-07-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
It would be great to know in more details how to get the fix mentioned on an armhfl Ubuntu 12.10 (no, we cannot upgrade the system, unfortunately). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713985

[Bug 713985] Re: [armel] Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM

2012-02-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
This boils down to eglibc working with 8-byte floats on ARM, even if it's declared long double. To see this behaviour on x86, build and run the following: #include #include int main () { double x = 6.0; printf("sizof(double)=%d\n",sizeof(double)); printf("lgamma (%.20f)=%.20f\n", x, lgamm

[Bug 713985] Re: [armel] Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM

2012-01-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
The bug is in fact in lgammal, as tgammal(x) simply takes expl(lgammal(x)); namely, lgammal(6.0) produces 4.78749174278204581157 on armel, while it should be closer to 4.7874917427820459942477, i.e. armel gives relative error of about 3.8e-17 -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 903562] [NEW] installer does not recognize kbd on Japanese ac100

2011-12-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Public bug reported: When installing the current Oneiric version (Ubuntu 11.10) on ARM AC100 (Japanese model AZ/05M PDN01N-00H01C), as described on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/TEGRA/AC100, choosing the Japanese keyboard hangs the installer, as well as attempts to use keyboard recognition hang it