Thanks for the details! I agree that the rationale sounds sane,
especially with other "large" projects using it. Let’s ack on that one.
Once the other required/recommended TODOs are solved with a version I
can review in the archive, do not hesitate to ping me again.
--
You received this bug noti
@Andreas: the changes in that version are only impacting first boot
experience, at provisionning time, and have no impact on subsequent
boot. This is why I think this is fine to skip orcular for those
particular set of changes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Patch removed: "Noble wsl-setup SRU without the .ico file (readd it
manually)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2091293/+attachment/5844207/+files/wsl-setup_noble_0.5.4~24.04_to_0.5.7~24.04.debdiff
** Patch removed: "livecd-rootfs debdiff"
https://bugs.launc
ORY "/README.md", "r"), &std::fclose);
|^
Would be nice to get it fixed.
** Changed in: nlohmann-json3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: nlohmann-json3 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) => (una
** Changed in: nlohmann-json3 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) => Didier Roche-Tolomelli
(didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093868
Title:
[
** Patch added: "Noble wsl-setup SRU without the .ico file (readd it manually)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2091293/+attachment/5844207/+files/wsl-setup_noble_0.5.4~24.04_to_0.5.7~24.04.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
** Description changed:
[Context]
Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no
longer depends on Windows application packages nor MS Store [1,2].
Instead distros are shipped as a single rootfs tarball with some special
metadata and the ".wsl" extension (to all
this is the noble version
** Patch added: "livecd-rootfs debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2091293/+attachment/5843142/+files/livecd-rootfs_24.04.81_to_24.04.82.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Patch added: "Noble wsl-setup SRU without the .ico file (readd it manually)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2091293/+attachment/5843141/+files/0.5.4~24.04_to_0.5.5~24.04_WITHOUT_icon_file.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
Microsoft is moving to a new package format which will allow us to
release a .wsl rootfs and will be published to releases.ubuntu.com. Move
to that format.
** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: wsl-setup (Ubuntu)
I think there is no active or planned work to bring zsys further on the
time being. This only impacted the new user addition and I we can drop
the patch for now without impacting too many users.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I have rechecked the package set in the ubuntu-oem branch. This version
fixes most of my recommended and required TODOs, Thanks!
* There are new lintian warnings on the binary package now that libraries have
been moved to /opt, I suggest you use lintian overrides there too to cleanup
the package
>>> I see comment #5 had required and recommended todos.
>Changes required from Lenovo side has been addressed and i think other concern
>from Canonical side has been fixed by AppArmor fix . Anything else needed ?
It doesn’t seem so? The version in the archive doesn’t fix any required
TODOs I hav
Override component to main
retry 1.0.5-3build1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in noble: universe/misc -> main
retry 1.0.5-3build1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in noble amd64: universe/utils/optional/40%
-> main
retry 1.0.5-3build1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in noble arm64: universe/utils/optional/40%
-> main
retry 1.0.5-3build1~ubuntu
Override component to main
retry 1.0.4-3build1 in jammy: universe/misc -> main
retry 1.0.4-3build1 in jammy amd64: universe/utils/optional/30% -> main
retry 1.0.4-3build1 in jammy arm64: universe/utils/optional/30% -> main
retry 1.0.4-3build1 in jammy armhf: universe/utils/optional/30% -> main
retr
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080390
Title:
Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol
To manage notifications ab
New images on both noble and jammy have been built with latest livecd-
rootfs and picked up packages from proposed.
The tests plan are passing for both distributions and we end up with the
desired artefacts.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
verification-needed-noble
I have successfully built wsl-pro-service against both packages in noble
and proposed and I confirm that both the build, the tests and the finale
binary has the expected behavior and output.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: ve
So, retry are in the release pocket for focal and noble, it seems we
can’t do post-release promotion in those pockets (which are surely read
only):
I’m getting:
Override component to main
retry 1.0.5-3 in noble: universe/misc -> main
retry 1.0.5-3 in noble amd64: universe/utils/optional/100% -> ma
** Also affects: golang-1.23 (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: golang-1.23 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: golang-1.23 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
Our incoming WSL Pro Service is a go tool that will require for both
security reasons and new features usage Go 1.23.
We will have a single code base for 20.04, 22.04 and 24.04 LTSes. Note
that this SRU is only about 22.04 and 24.04 as 20.04 will be treated
separa
Override component to main
libsysprof-6-6 47~beta-1 in oracular amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main
libsysprof-6-6 47~beta-1 in oracular arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main
libsysprof-6-6 47~beta-1 in oracular armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main
libsysprof-6-6 47~beta-1 in orac
In main now
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076381
Title:
[MIR] retry
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/retry/+bug/2076381/+subs
$ ./change-override -c main -S luit
Override component to main
luit 2.0.20221028-1 in oracular: universe/misc -> main
luit 2.0.20221028-1 in oracular amd64: universe/utils/optional/100% -> main
luit 2.0.20221028-1 in oracular arm64: universe/utils/optional/100% -> main
luit 2.0.20221028-1 in oracul
$ ./change-override -c main -S libdex
Override component to main
libdex 0.7.1-1 in oracular: universe/misc -> main
gir1.2-dex-1 0.7.1-1 in oracular amd64: universe/introspection/optional/100% ->
main
gir1.2-dex-1 0.7.1-1 in oracular arm64: universe/introspection/optional/100% ->
main
gir1.2-dex-1
$ ./change-override -c main -S libpanel
Override component to main
libpanel 1.7.1-3 in oracular: universe/misc -> main
gir1.2-panel-1 1.7.1-3 in oracular amd64: universe/introspection/optional/100%
-> main
gir1.2-panel-1 1.7.1-3 in oracular arm64: universe/introspection/optional/100%
-> main
gir1
** Description changed:
Note: all changes are related to each other and need to land together
before next WSL image rebuild.
Previously, WSL instances relied on a very lightweight build pipeline which
was using the CPC image.
In 22.04 we did a first step to have WSL has its own project
** Description changed:
+ Note: all changes are related to each other and need to land together
+ before next WSL image rebuild.
+
Previously, WSL instances relied on a very lightweight build pipeline which
was using the CPC image.
In 22.04 we did a first step to have WSL has its own project
Public bug reported:
Previously, WSL instances relied on a very lightweight build pipeline which was
using the CPC image.
In 22.04 we did a first step to have WSL has its own project in livecd-rootfs,
with its own seed and image to produce a rootfs.
However, a lot of ubuntu differentatior (enab
$ ./change-override -c main -t cpdb-libs
Override component to main
cpdb-libs 2.0~b5-1.2build1 in oracular: universe/net -> main
Override [y|N]? y
1 publication overridden.
$ ./change-override -c main libcpdb-frontend2t64 libcpdb2t64
Override component to main
libcpdb-frontend2t64 2.0~b5-1.2build1
$ ./change-override -c main -S cpdb-backend-cups
Override component to main
cpdb-backend-cups 2.0b5-1ubuntu1 in oracular: universe/net -> main
cpdb-backend-cups 2.0b5-1ubuntu1 in oracular amd64: universe/net/optional/100%
-> main
cpdb-backend-cups 2.0b5-1ubuntu1 in oracular arm64: universe/net/op
evice-glue (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) => Ubuntu Security Team
(ubuntu-security)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074086
Title:
MIR libimobiledevice-
Override component to main
libdisplay-info 0.2.0-2 in oracular: universe/misc -> main
libdisplay-info-dev 0.2.0-2 in oracular amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100%
-> main
libdisplay-info-dev 0.2.0-2 in oracular arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100%
-> main
libdisplay-info-dev 0.2.0-2 in oracul
I had a rereview as requested by jbicha to unblock GNOME-Shell as slyon
is unavailable for some time. All required TODOs are fixed and some
recommended TODOs are. The package is showing up in c-m mistmatch now.
Acking the MIR.
** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Commi
** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071396
Title:
[MIR] libdisplay-i
one needed for this case
** Changed in: isa-support (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: isa-support (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Ok, I see now that the autopkgtest part was merged and the description
was updated even if the part "- The package does have not failing
autopkgtests right now" was still present.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074086
Title:
MIR libimobiledevice-glue
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libimobiledevice-glue/+
** Changed in: isa-support (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073895
Title:
[MIR] isa-support
To man
** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: ubuntu-x13s-settings (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074078
Title:
[MIR] ubuntu-x13s-settings
To
** Changed in: libimobiledevice-glue (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074086
Title:
MIR libimobiledevice-g
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit or libseed
- not part of the UI for extra checks
- no translation present, but none needed for this case (user visible)?
Note: closed source, so most of the upstream code check can’t be done.
** Changed in: lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier
** Changed in: lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058192
Title:
[MIR] lenovo-wwan-unlock
I have sponsored the package to oracular first. This one is 0.5.3. I did
change the VCS to update debian/changelog. And tag it as v0.5.3.
I have changed the SRU (noble) backport to:
- target noble as release series in the SRU bug.
- have a version that is SRU compatible (it needs to be ealier than
** Also affects: wsl-setup (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065349
Title:
[SRU] Default user created by cloud-init confuses W
golang 1.22 is now in mantic NEW queue and adsys 0.14.1~23.10 is in the
unapproved queue (the only change on the last one is that I adapted the
debdiff to not remove the rebuild upload changelog entry).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
** Description changed:
[context]
ADSys is a tool designed for administering and implementing Group Policy
Objects (GPOs) from Active Directory on Linux systems. It includes a suite of
services and commands that empower administrators to efficiently manage policy
updates and maintain compli
** Description changed:
[context]
ADSys is a tool designed for administering and implementing Group Policy
Objects (GPOs) from Active Directory on Linux systems. It includes a suite of
services and commands that empower administrators to efficiently manage policy
updates and maintain compli
** Description changed:
As part of our entreprise desktop offering, there is the request to
backport ubuntu-proxy-manager to 22.04 LTS. The package is in universe
for now.
Ubuntu Proxy Manager is a D-Bus mediated service intended to be
triggered by ADSys, our Active Directory GPO inte
** Changed in: python-cepces (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
** Changed in: python-requests-gssapi (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
** Also affects: python-requests-gssapi (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python-cepces (Ubuntu Jammy
** Changed in: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
** Also affects: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification b
** Changed in: golang-1.22 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Description changed:
[context]
ADSys is a tool designed for administering and implementing Group Policy
Objects (GPOs) from Active Directory on Linux systems. It includes a suite of
services and commands that empower
The issue had been identified to be in GDM.
** Package changed: authd (Ubuntu) => gdm3 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061850
Title:
Can't authenticate in TTY after installi
We decided to remove the authd package in noble for the time being.
The current implementation (in particular the one in the PAM module) is
not up to our standard in terms of quality and what we are confortable
to support in the long term. Rather than releasing as is and having
risky SRUs in the f
Removing packages from noble:
authd 0.2.1 in noble
authd 0.2.1 in noble amd64
authd 0.2.1 in noble arm64
authd 0.2.1 in noble armhf
authd 0.2.1 in noble ppc64el
authd 0.2.1 in noble riscv64
authd
We decided to remove the authd package in noble for the time being.
The current implementation (in particular the one in the PAM module) is
not up to our standard in terms of quality and what we are confortable
to support in the long term. Rather than releasing as is and having
risky SRUs in the f
The last security request (having per user certificate to secure the
gRPC communication so that they can’t be hijacked cross-users) is now
addressed with 0.1.4 with many other enhancements fixing some
recommended TODOs.
I’m proceeding thus with the promotion.
** Changed in: wsl-pro-service (Ubunt
yeah, informing the user will go a long way IMHO!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062133
Title:
Migration to the snap issues
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
Public bug reported:
After migrating to the snap, I noticed the following:
- the launcher icon disappeared (I guess it’s because the .desktop file is now
"thunderbird_thunderbird.desktop"
- the snap migration took a good 5 minutes on my machine (I guess it’s the copy
of the email folder), withou
Confirming that it’s fixed on the same machine with 550.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061079
Title:
GTK-ngl (new default backend) rendering issues with the nvidia 470
driver
To
Public bug reported:
With nvidia driver, all GTK4 applications have label rendering issues.
They are not refresh until passing the cursor over them, giving blank
windows. The corner are white and not themed. Passing from one app scren
to another one reproduces the issue.
gnome-control-center or
** Summary changed:
- Update authd to current version
+ [FFe] Update authd to current version
** Description changed:
Authd is a new package in noble, in universe.
This package is not shipped by default, we made many improvements and
fixes in the current version. We don’t plan to seed i
** Summary changed:
- Update and seed wsl-pro-service in the WSL images
+ [FFe] Update and seed wsl-pro-service in the WSL images
** Description changed:
This is a new package for this release. It’s only functional with a
Windows agent which is not publically released and under beta for now.
Public bug reported:
This is a new package for this release. It’s only functional with a
Windows agent which is not publically released and under beta for now.
As the end of the beta will be after the 24.04 release, we want to get
as close as possible to the current code level, knowing that curre
Public bug reported:
Authd is a new package in noble, in universe.
This package is not shipped by default, we made many improvements and
fixes in the current version. We don’t plan to seed it this release,
despite the MIR being approved.
Update contains a lot of vendoring updates, and code chang
Public bug reported:
Tested with 124-1ubuntu1 on noble
1. Create 3 users on the machine:
- sudo-user1, part of sudo group
- sudo-user2, part of sudo group
- normal-user, not part of the sudo group
2. Login with normal-user
3. Try to execute pkexec or any other command prompting for polkit
-> only
With this in light (but we have the wider "everything that is in main
for a very long time in ubuntu, even being security reviewed and got
multiple uploads), I would agree that -server could have another
security/fresh look. Do you think it’s something the security team has
the capacity to look?
O
Confirming that the only REQUIRED TODO is now fixed. Thanks for checking
it slyon!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004442
Title:
[MIR] aom (dependency of libheif)
To manage notificat
Hey everyone and Paul. First, sorry for the delayed answered (I was
thinking you would get me reassign and for some reason, I missed
subscribing to the bug)
> But I do not really understand the harm of having these entries kept
for documentation, except this could pile up and become a mess at some
I continued exploring this topic myself last week and was able to rely
on a tool developed for this: https://github.com/coreos/cargo-vendor-
filterer/.
This tool is not ideal in the sense that:
- it vendorize the whole content
- then, it filters by replacing entire crates based on some filtering r
translation present, but none needed for this case
Problems:
- Some usage of setuid, but ok as this is not in the -client package but
-server.
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) => (un
We agreed during the MIR meeting that a generic tooling as part of
debhelper would be the best way, didn’t we?
See my arguments above different upstream policies in different source
packages, where if we start introducing this in a per-package base, that
would create divergences between projects.
73 matches
Mail list logo
