It's just adding / changing a field, yes. Benefit is that it lets 32-bit
libraries be installed at the same time as 64-bit ones, without using a
vm or container, which is often useful for running legacy software.
Downside is that if for some reason the package were changed to make it
impossible to
Yes, you can close it
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1731715
Title:
Add multiarch metadata to libibverbs1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
Yes, that worked for me. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1731715
Title:
Add multiarch metadata to libibverbs1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
Thanks!
If I recall correctly, there was advice somewhere to file a bug first
against the distro I actually use, rather than upstream. And then file
against upstream if advised by maintainers.
Also, the problem with multiarch is that it requires the entire
dependency chain to be multiarch to work
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libhwloc-plugins=1.11.5-1
Should just need to add Multi-Arch: same to control file
** Affects: hwloc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libvtk6.3=6.3.0+dfsg1-10build1
Should just involve adding Multi-Arch: same to the control file
** Affects: vtk6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libnetcdf-c++4=4.2-7
Should just need to add Multi-Arch: same to control
** Affects: netcdf-cxx (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
librdmacm1=1.1.0-2
Should just need to add Multi-Arch: same to control
** Affects: librdmacm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libpsm-infinipath1=3.3+19.g67c0807.open-3
Should just need to add Multi-Arch: same to control
** Affects: infinipath-psm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libibverbs1=1.2.1-2ubuntu1
Should just require adding Multi-Arch: same to control
** Affects: libibverbs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libfabric1=1.4.0-1
Should involve doing something with the binary (e.g. a separate
bin/tools package), and adding the appropriate metadata.
** Affects: libfabric (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification bec
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libgl2ps1=1.3.9-4
Should just need to add Multi-Arch: same to control
** Affects: gl2ps (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
liblept5=1.74.4-1
Should just need to add Multi-Arch: same to control file
** Affects: leptonlib (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libogdi3.2=3.2.0+ds-2
Should involving moving the .so files to the multiarch dirs and adding
Multi-Arch: same
** Affects: ogdi-dfsg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libnetcdf11=1:4.4.1.1-2ubuntu1
Should just require adding Multi-Arch: same
** Affects: netcdf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libhdf4-0-alt=4.2.13-1
Should just involve adding the appropriate metadata and moving .so files
to their architecture-dependent paths
** Affects: libhdf4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libgeos-3.5.1=3.5.1-3
Should just need to add Multi-Arch: same to control file.
** Affects: geos (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
libarmadillo7=1:7.960.1+dfsg-1
Should just involve putting the .so files in the multiarch directories,
and marking the package as Multi-Arch: same
** Affects: armadillo (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notificat
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 17.10
liblilv-0-0=0.24.2~dfsg0-1
liblilv-0-0 seems to trivially work in multiarch if the produced .so
files are moved to the multi-arch directories, and the package is marked
Multi-Arch: same
** Affects: lilv (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
Public bug reported:
Release: Artful Aardvark 17.10
Package version: 1.0.28-4
The current version of libsndfile1-dev is not able to be marked Multi-
Arch: same, because the examples it provides includes an autoheader (?)
generated config.h file, which has architecture-specific defines like
SIZEOF
Public bug reported:
Release: Artful Aardvark 17.10
Package version: 1.12.3-1
I modified the debian/gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0.install file to put its
girepository-1.0 files under the architecture-dependent directory, by
removing the target specifier (usr/lib). As far as I can tell, the non-
architectu
Public bug reported:
Release: Artful Aardvark 17.10
Package version: 3.04.01-6
A quick use of dpkg -L libtesseract3 shows that the package only has one
real .so file, which is already in the architecture-dependent lib
folder, and so could probably be easily changed to be Multi-Arch: same.
It's al
Public bug reported:
On my current version of Ubuntu (17.10) and packages libsrtp0 and
libsrtp0-dev at version 1.4.5~20130609~dfsg-2ubuntu1, these packages do
not actually have multiarch support.
I was able to download the package source, add Multi-Arch: same to both,
and build and install libsrt
Public bug reported:
Release: Artful Aardvark 17.10
Package version: 0.34.0-1
After modifying libpixman-1-dev to be Multi-Arch: same, and checking
that it installs architecture-specific files appropriately, and
successfully building and installing both the amd64 and i386 versions
simultaneously,
It might also be sane to mark the mjpegtools package with Multi-Arch:
allowed (or foreign), as programs that use the binary tools may not care
what architecture the tools are.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Public bug reported:
Release: Artful Aardvark 17.10
Package version: 1.14.0~dfsg1-1
As far as I can tell, the package lv2-dev has no architecture-dependent
files at all, and can be marked Multi-Arch: foreign, and lv2-examples
puts .so files outside the architecture-dependent folders, making it
co
** Description changed:
Release: Artful Aardvark 17.10
Package Version: 0.7.1-2
As far as I can tell (after creating a local patch and building and
installing them as Multi-Arch: same) libxkbcommon-dev and
libxkbcommon-x11-dev can be safely marked as Multi-Arch: same with no
additio
Public bug reported:
Release: Artful Aardvark 17.10
Package Version: 0.7.1-2
As far as I can tell (after creating a local patch and building and
installing them as Multi-Arch: same) libxkbcommon-dev and
libxkbcommon-x11-dev can be safely marked as Multi-Arch: same with no
additional changes. Note
>From my own investigations, libsidplay1v5 and libsidplay1-dev could also
be marked as Multi-Arch: same - I made a quick patch of libsidplay1v5
and libsidplay1-dev by adding Multi-Arch: same to both and verified that
the produced debs seem to fit the multiarch spec and could be installed
simultaneo
29 matches
Mail list logo
