[Bug 132373] Re: cryptsetup luks commands randomly fail

So are we pushing a gutsy release next without this patched anywhere? -- cryptsetup luks commands randomly fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 132373] Re: cryptsetup luks commands randomly fail

Just pinging on this, it's a fairly serious bug for anyone trying to do anything automated with cryptsetup. -David -- cryptsetup luks commands randomly fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact

[Bug 123548] Re: lcd brightness down doesn't work when gpm running (t60)

This is _not_ an exact duplicate of #81407, and by marking is as duplicate, all the logs here are hidden, the other bug has not been updated in months. As of g-p-m 2.19.6-0ubuntu2 brightness keys are now (kind of) working on the X60, but the OSD doesn't always display/update. Also, entering g-p-m

[Bug 123548] Re: lcd brightness down doesn't work when gpm running (t60)

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 81407 [Feisty] Thinkpad (all models) LCD brightness control cycles between lowest settings only -- lcd brightness down doesn't work when gpm running (t60) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123548 You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 123548] Re: lcd brightness down doesn't work when gpm running (t60)

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 81407 [Feisty] Thinkpad (all models) LCD brightness control cycles between lowest settings only -- lcd brightness down doesn't work when gpm running (t60) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123548 You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 132373] Re: cryptsetup luks commands randomly fail

Patch that appears to fix this by calling UDEVSETTLE ** Attachment added: "2249-001.bin" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8805748/2249-001.bin -- cryptsetup luks commands randomly fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 132373] cryptsetup luks commands randomly fail

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cryptsetup This is on gutsy 2:1.0.4+svn29-1ubuntu4 luksAdd/luksDel can randomly fail with errors such as "Failed to setup dm-crypt key mapping Check kernel for support for the aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 cipher spec and verify that /dev/sda5 contains at least

[Bug 123548] Re: lcd brightness down doesn't work when gpm running (t60)

** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager This is on a Thinkpad T60p smbios.bios.release_date = '03/15/2007' (string) smbios.bios.vendor = 'LENOVO' (string) smbios.bios.version = '79ETD1WW (2.11 )' (string) smbios.chassis.manufacturer = 'LENOVO'

[Bug 14833] Re: POST_VIDEO option need to be commented on Dell Latitude D800

Having POST_VIDEO=true also stops resume working on a T60p (FireGL 5200) with the fglrx driver. This is driver 8.37.6 in gutsy Tribe 2. The same system with the vesa driver suspends/resumes fine with POST_VIDEO=true -- POST_VIDEO option need to be commented on Dell Latitude D800 https://bugs.lau

[Bug 123548] Re: lcd brightness down doesn't work when gpm running (t60)

** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager This is on a Thinkpad T60p smbios.bios.release_date = '03/15/2007' (string) smbios.bios.vendor = 'LENOVO' (string) smbios.bios.version = '79ETD1WW (2.11 )' (string) smbios.chassis.manufacturer = 'LENOVO'

[Bug 123548] lcd brightness down doesn't work when gpm running (t60)

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager This is on a Thinkpad T60p smbios.bios.release_date = '03/15/2007' (string) smbios.bios.vendor = 'LENOVO' (string) smbios.bios.version = '79ETD1WW (2.11 )' (string) smbios.chassis.manufacturer = 'LENOVO' (string) smbios.

[Bug 106937] depmod isn't run when built with m-a

Public bug reported: When the pwc-modules deb is built from pwc-source using module- assistant, _KVERS_ is not substituted in the postinst. It's just left as if [ "`uname -r`" = "_KVERS_" ] ; then depmod -a fi Which of course is never true. Does this test actually achieve much?