On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:26:34 -0300, David Olivari
wrote:
> There might an option to deactivate resolving but I didn't found a
> simple way
/etc/default/rsyslog
# Options to rsyslogd
# -x disables DNS lookups on messages recieved with -r
--
Denilson Figueiredo de Sá
Vialink
Rio de Janeiro
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:35:16 -0200, Stefano_PG
wrote:
> I read about "... stable USB drivers..." from the 2.6.28 changelog.
> Maybe it's the end for this bug? I would like testing the 2.6.28 but I'm
> not confident with kernel settings.
I read that at ubuntugeek, but couldn't found anything rela
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:52:00 -0200, Oisín Mac Fhearaí
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everybody seems to be assuming lately that this bug only affects USB
> storage devices. However, I was getting these errors with a USB
> wireless adapter and I'm sure other people on this buglist are not
> only ha
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:31:26 -0200, MountainX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Pardon me for asking my question a second time. I appreciate anyone
> pointing me to a source of info that will tell me which hardware is NOT
> subject to this bug. I'm willing to change hardware to keep Ubuntu.
My laptop
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 22:59, phaidros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks, consider try blacklisting uhci-hcd and report back. It *might* be
> the help :)
I'm really not sure, but... isn't uhci/ohci required for
low-speed/full-speed devices? Or for USB 1.x devices? (even when
connected to a USB 2
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 21:06, David Morgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, disregard those last two posts, damm thing still happening It just
> didn't at first boot with new kernel. WTF
I was expecting that.
I had this problem years ago, with USB modules built-in. Then, I've
chosen to compi
> Intrepid 2.6.27-7-generic falls back automatically and mounts my
> drive in USB 1.0/1.1 mode when plugged. When booting with the
> drive plugged in, it's mounted full speed.
Just a note: USB 1.x has two speeds: low speed and full speed. USB 2.0
adds another one: high speed.
--
ehci_hcd module
What's more, I think this bug only happens on some types of hardware
(some types of host controller).
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Answering to PiedPiper:
Configurations, Interfaces and Endpoints are the basic structures of an USB
device. You can't limit or mess with those things, else the device will simply
not work. As comparison, it is like limiting the number of legs that a horse
(or maybe any animal) can have. You can'
** Bug watch added: Gentoo Bugzilla #236528
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236528
** Also affects: usbutils (Gentoo Linux) via
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236528
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
lsusb : Fix or remove -t option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
12mbit/s? Isn't that the full-speed USB 1.0/1.1 max transfer rate?
USB 2.0 high-speed has a theoretical limit of 480mbit/s.
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
This is a bug in linux kernel itself, and can happen on any
distribution. I've myself experienced this bug in Gentoo/Linux.
However, this bug appears to happen only in some hardware
configurations. On my old Pentium III 800, Via chipset with on-board USB
1.x, plus an Ali USB 2.0 PCI card, it alway
I disagree with you, Daniel Gimpelevich. I think this issue also happens
when devices are hot-plugged (i.e., after the boot has been completed).
Could someone else confirm this?
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug no
Ok, looks like this update has been finally added to main repository.
Now I can say: problem solved. 2 weeks and half after the issue has been
detected. I don't want to troll here, but just think to yourselves how
many people might have just installed Ubuntu in that time, and found
that flashplayer
But again, why this flash update can't be added to the default repository?
(or it will, but only after a long period of time?)
Without adding any extra repository, I received a firefox update, among
some other packages. Why not flashplayer too?
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-no
I ask to myself if the average Ubuntu user will be able to figure that
by himself.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Is the update already commited to the main repository? I have a new
ubuntu system (installed about two weeks ago) and I still can't install
flashplayer correctly. Here is the synaptic output:
(there is also a side-bug, because synaptic window says "Successfully
applied all changes", I may post the
I don't want to be a troll here, but take a look on how Gentoo guys have
fixed this:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185141
Maybe Ubuntu can take a similar approach?
Other related URLs:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo-x86/net-www/netscape-flash/ChangeLog
http://pack
This bug also happens on newly installed machines.
I see Gentoo guys are now downloading a RPM file and unpacking it to get
the required files. See the link to bug report I posted previously. (and
no, Gentoo is not RPM-based)
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.l
Not sure if this helps, but the related bug report for Gentoo guys is here:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185141
The main reason is upstream changing the tarball without changing its name.
Maybe people from Ubuntu and Gentoo could look at this issue together, because
that's a common prob
Sorry, I said Gentoo has resolved that, but in fact they are still trying to
solve that. See:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185141
The main reason is upstream changing the tarball without changing its name.
Maybe people from Ubuntu and Gentoo could look at this issue together, because
t
Yes, I can confirm that. This happens because recently a new flashplayer
version has been released. Gentoo already uses the new version.
--
flashplugin-nonfree installs everything except the plugin itself
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126590
You received this bug notification because you are a
22 matches
Mail list logo
