[Bug 1814536] [NEW] out of date: 2017.7 -> 2018.1

2019-02-04 Thread Claes Wallin
Public bug reported: Err:6 http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 8B48AD6246925553 NO_PUBKEY 7638D0442B90D010 NO_PUBKEY 04EE7237B7D453EC ** Affects: debian-archive-keyring (Ubunt

[Bug 1348431] Re: -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs

2017-04-26 Thread Claes Wallin
This feature is in e2fsprogs 1.43, which is in yakkety (16.10). The bug can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348431 Title: -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs

[Bug 1348431] Re: -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs

2017-04-26 Thread Claes Wallin
Have verified that `mkfs.ext4 -O inline_data` works with the yakkety e2fsprogs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348431 Title: -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs To mana

[Bug 1385271] Re: Error authenticating some packages

2016-09-22 Thread Claes Wallin
Still getting this when going 14.04->16.04. It complained about my kernel image package. I upgraded to the latest kernel, removed all older kernel packages, now it complained about my fresh installed kernel package. What does this even mean? What is it authenticating? Trying the disabling config

[Bug 591823] Re: "File descriptor \d+ (\S+) leaked on lvs invocation."

2015-05-18 Thread Claes Wallin
Yep, still getting this tty spam multiple times every time update-grub runs from apt. Not when running update-grub, not when running dpkg- reconfigure linux-image-*, only when running apt install. So probably this should be a bug on apt. Suppressing it by setting LVM_SUPPRESS_FD_WARNINGS works, of

[Bug 1348431] Re: -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs

2014-12-17 Thread Claes Wallin
Thank you Daniel and Theodore for your feedback! I tried merging pu into maint the other day, but it didn't apply cleanly. I will try again later. When I get around to trying it out, I will go with your recommendation and use the latest mainline. -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1349020] Re: inline_data option on ext4 truncates symlinks

2014-08-20 Thread Claes Wallin
The bug has been fixed in -proposed. Performed the test in the bug description. The `128` file accurately points to a 128 bytes long filename. Double-checked that the file system was actually using -O inline_data. Disk usage reflects it as well: # du ext4{,_inline}/test{/*,} 4 ext4/test/128

[Bug 1349020] Re: inline_data option on ext4 truncates symlinks

2014-08-20 Thread Claes Wallin
** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1349020 Title: inline_data option on ext4 truncates symlinks To man

[Bug 1349020] Re: inline_data option on ext4 truncates symlinks

2014-08-04 Thread Claes Wallin
That fixes the bug. Even symlinks created by the faulty kernel will be interpreted correctly by the fixed kernel, as the fault is in reading, not in writing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 1349020] Re: inline_data option on ext4 truncates symlinks

2014-07-26 Thread Claes Wallin
** Description changed: To replicate the bug, create two filesystems, one with `mkfs.ext4 -I 256`, one with `mkfs.ext4 -I 256 -O inline_data`. An inode size of 256 bytes is the default, but included here for clarity. To do this, you are going to need an `e2fsprogs` from trunk, or version 1

[Bug 1349020] [NEW] inline_data option on ext4 truncates symlinks

2014-07-26 Thread Claes Wallin
Public bug reported: To replicate the bug, create two filesystems, one with `mkfs.ext4 -I 256`, one with `mkfs.ext4 -I 256 -O inline_data`. An inode size of 256 bytes is the default, but included here for clarity. To do this, you are going to need an `e2fsprogs` from trunk, or version 1.43 if it h

[Bug 1348431] Re: -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs

2014-07-24 Thread Claes Wallin
... so this will be fixed whenever 1.43 is released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348431 Title: -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1348431] Re: -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs

2014-07-24 Thread Claes Wallin
`pu` was merged into `next`/`master` early March 2014. ** Branch linked: lp:~vcs-imports/e2fsprogs/trunk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348431 Title: -O inline_data not supported by

[Bug 1348431] [NEW] -O inline_data not supported by Ubuntu e2fsprogs

2014-07-24 Thread Claes Wallin
Public bug reported: Since kernel version 3.8, ext4 supports the file system option inline_data to put file content into the inode itself as an extended attribute. However, this feature cannot be enabled using the included e2fsprogs in Trusty Tahr. If it has been enabled for a file system, boot e2

[Bug 1188011] [NEW] should conflict with quantal linux-image-extra-* packages

2013-06-05 Thread Claes Wallin
Public bug reported: I have both precise and quantal in my sources.list. Whenever I do an `apt-get install linux-image-generic/quantal` and there is a ~precise version similar to the version linux-image-generic depends on, apt-get always picks the precise version first, which contains all the fil

[Bug 608907] Re: [lucid][maverick][i915] Lenovo U160 Intel i7 620UM blank screen

2011-01-02 Thread Claes Wallin
I confirm that 2.6.37-rc8 works on my Lenovo U160 with an U5400. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608907 Title: [lucid][maverick][i915] Lenovo U160 Intel i7 620UM blank screen -- ubun

[Bug 608907] Re: [lucid][maverick][i915] Lenovo U160 Intel i7 620UM blank screen

2010-12-23 Thread Claes Wallin
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #596557 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596557 ** Also affects: fedora via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596557 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 608907] Re: [lucid][maverick][i915] Lenovo U160 Intel i7 620UM blank screen

2010-12-23 Thread Claes Wallin
Latest drm-intel-fixes solves the problem for my i5 U160! Big hug to Chris Wilson and happy holidays to all the hard-working übergeeks making our lives better every day! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 608907] Re: [lucid][maverick][i915] Lenovo U160 Intel i7 620UM blank screen

2010-12-14 Thread Claes Wallin
I have a U160 with a 8086:0046 chip and Xorg reports the display as EDID vendor "AUO", prod id 12380. Tried running 2.6.37-rc5, which as far as I understand is up-to-date with intel-drm. Problem persists. If I boot without "nomodeset" the machine boots with the screen lit, but black. Also, it doe