[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-04 Thread Carlos Nihelton
--- CLOUD-INIT (JAMMY AND NOBLE ONLY) -- Asserts that existing behaviour won't change. To avoid a long repetition, refer to ISO QA "WSL_cloud-init" test case: https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/450/builds/336438/testcases/1835/results 1. Download an ima

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-04 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [ Impact ] * wsl-setup as the name suggests is specific for Ubuntu on the WSL platform. Other Ubuntu products and experiences are not affected. It holds some configuration data specific needed for smooth integration with that platform as well as the initial set

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-04 Thread Carlos Nihelton
I updated the test description to be possible to run it without a custom image. It's quite more complicated to do, but still doable. ** Description changed: [ Impact ] * wsl-setup as the name suggests is specific for Ubuntu on the WSL platform. Other Ubuntu products and experiences are n

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-04 Thread Carlos Nihelton
> Why did you have to use a PPA? I didn't find a way to build an image from a livefs PPA with '-proposed' enabled. > Is that binary an exact copy of the binary currently in proposed? If you sha256 both, do you get the same results? It's a source copy, not the same binary, as LP requires uploadin

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-04 Thread Carlos Nihelton
> However, not included in the tests, the custom terminal profile with our > Ubuntu customizations doesn't seem to be created for the non-common username > case. Resources like fonts are being installed correctly. > > If the terminal is restarted, then you will find a standard WSL profile > **wi

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-04 Thread Carlos Nihelton
I did the testing for **Plucky** in two devices with different versions of WSL: BINFMT test case -- Windows 11 25H2 Pro Insider Preview Version 10.0.26200.5710 WSL: 2.5.7.0 Kernel: 6.6.87.1-1 WSLg: 1.0.66 Test pass OK SETUP SCRIPT --

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-04 Thread Carlos Nihelton
I did the testing for **Noble** in two devices with different versions of WSL: BINFMT and CLOUD-INIT test cases -- Windows 11 25H2 Pro Insider Preview Version 10.0.26200.5710 WSL: 2.5.7.0 Kernel: 6.6.87.1-1 WSLg: 1.0.66 Tests pass OK SETUP SCRIPT ---

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-04 Thread Carlos Nihelton
To ease testing I uploaded wsl-setup 0.5.10 to a PPA from where I built WSL images: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wsl- dev/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/wsl/+build/821385/+files/livecd.ubuntu-wsl.wsl - ARM64: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wsl- dev/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/wsl/+build/821386/+files/liv

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-08-01 Thread Carlos Nihelton
If the way systemd detects WSL supported versioning that would be an easy task. As that's not the case, to implement your suggestion we'd need to ship a systemd generator that would subprocess `wsl.exe --version`, parse the outputs and decide whether to block or not systemd-binfmt.service. It sound

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-31 Thread Carlos Nihelton
We can receive it in -updates later, let's prioritize more urgent work. I'm changing the milestone in favour of more critical SRUs. ** Changed in: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: ubuntu-24.04.3 => noble-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
> Can you elaborate on what will happen to users of older versions of wsl if they apply this update? Do they need to take some manual action? What will stop working or break? Definetely! What happens depend on which version. Prior to WSL 2.5.1 --- With the removal of the systemd-

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-29 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2118617/+attachment/5894245/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2118617

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-29 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch removed: "debdiff for noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2118617/+attachment/5893079/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2118617

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-07-25 Thread Carlos Nihelton
It seems that the PS7 issue has been addressed. Can we retrigger livecd- rootfs tests and hopefully clear out the last blocker for this SRU to complete? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-25 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [ Impact ] * wsl-setup as the name suggests is specific for Ubuntu on the WSL platform. Other Ubuntu products and experiences are not affected. It holds some configuration data specific needed for smooth integration with that platform as well as the initial set

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-25 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for jammy (diff from jammy-proposed)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2118617/+attachment/5893080/+files/jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-25 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2118617/+attachment/5893079/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2118617

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-25 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2118617/+attachment/5893078/+files/plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2118617

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-25 Thread Carlos Nihelton
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2118617 Title: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-25 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for questing" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2118617/+attachment/5893072/+files/questing.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211

[Bug 2118617] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-24 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Also affects: wsl-setup (Ubuntu Questing) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: wsl-setup (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: wsl-setup (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: wsl-setup (Ubuntu

[Bug 2118617] [NEW] [SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames

2025-07-24 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] * wsl-setup as the name suggests is specific for Ubuntu on the WSL platform. Other Ubuntu products and experiences are not affected. It holds some configuration data specific needed for smooth integration with that platform as well as the initial setup script invok

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-21 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Changed in: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.3 ** Changed in: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Plucky) Milestone: None => plucky-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 2116957] Re: Typos and incorrect Brazilian Portuguese translations across the Settings app

2025-07-15 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The messages changed quite considerably. Of the issues mentioned above I only found this one (in both upstream and 25.10): #: panels/system/users/cc-add-user-dialog.ui:107 msgid "User sets password on _first login" msgstr "Os usuário definem a senha no _primeiro início de seção" (incorrect

[Bug 2116957] Re: Typos and incorrect Brazilian Portuguese translations across the Settings app

2025-07-15 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Thanks for reporting that @o-alquimista. Indeed the words "ecrã" and "Detetar" are correct in European Portuguese but either unusual or incorrect in Brazilian Portuguese. Regarding > 1. Incorrect pluralization in the "Add user" dialog. > In the Password section, the first radio button label star

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-07-15 Thread Carlos Nihelton
It took me long to realize that livecd-rootfs is still held in proposed due an apparent regression, the same previously mentioned. Digging a little bit more with some explanations from @ahasenack, I think this livecd-rootfs autopkgtests are affected by the mandatory proxy settings mentioned in LP 2

[Bug 2116119] Re: autopkgtests fail on PS7 due to mandatory proxy

2025-07-15 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2116119 Title: autopkgtests fail on PS7 due to mandatory proxy To m

[Bug 2116119] Re: autopkgtests fail on PS7 due to mandatory proxy

2025-07-15 Thread Carlos Nihelton
I suspect that's also the case of livecd-rootfs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-rootfs I'm seeing autopkgtest failing to download small text files from addresses like people.canonical.com, ports.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-archive- team.ubuntu.com to name a few. One can see it's failing

[Bug 2103997] Re: [SRU] backport golang-1.23/1.23.7-1 to oracular/noble/jammy/focal

2025-07-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Does this supersede 2085834? Is there anybody working on this? The backport of golang-1.23-go to Focal is interesting for Ubuntu on WSL, besides MAAS. Since I don't see any uploads referring to this SRU I'd like to recommend (or request) version 1.23.11 since it's the latest release of the 1.23 ser

[Bug 2115536] Re: [SRU] Allow building WSL images of Focal in the new format

2025-07-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211553

[Bug 2115426] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-setup as new packge for Focal

2025-07-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Changed in: wsl-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115426 Title: [SRU] Backport wsl-setup as new packge for Focal To manage notifi

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Thanks @uralt! Good that 24.04 users will no longer be able to do- release-upgrade into 24.10! What about the other releases? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106757 Title: [SRU] wsl-p

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-07-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091293 Title: [SRU] Move WSL to

[Bug 2115536] Re: [SRU] Allow building WSL images of Focal in the new format

2025-07-03 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cnihelton/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/488297 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115536 Title: [SRU] Allow building W

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.changes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5887624/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.buildinfo" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5887625/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.buildinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.tar.xz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5887623/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment removed: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.dsc" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871124/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.dsc ** Attachment removed: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.tar.xz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for oracular" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5887620/+files/oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5887621/+files/plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5887619/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch removed: "debdiff for noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5887618/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5887618/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Indeed there was a mistake from my side to mention the toolchain version pinning in the debian/changelog. That happens at the Go workspace scope (see the go.work file in the monorepo at GH: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-pro-for-wsl/blob/0.1.18/go.work#L3), but that's not visible in this sourc

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
andscape, by passing the + CLI flag --register-if-needed to landscape-config. + - Upgrades various golang dependencies. - -- Carlos Nihelton Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:50:32 +  -- Carlos Nihelton Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:50:32 -0300 wsl-pro-service (0.1.5) oracular; urgency=medium

[Bug 2098698] Re: [SRU] libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Regarding Test Case 1 - gtk4-demo on containers (running on WSL in my case), installing libgtk-4-1 from noble-proposed pulls out libgles2: ``` s@DESKTOP-551PQ9O:/mnt/c/Users/User$ sudo apt install libgtk-4-1/noble-proposed Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading stat

[Bug 2109978] Re: [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Regarding Test Case 1 - gtk4-demo on containers (running on WSL in my case), installing libgtk-4-1 from noble-proposed pulls out libgles2: ``` s@DESKTOP-551PQ9O:/mnt/c/Users/User$ sudo apt install libgtk-4-1/noble-proposed Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading stat

[Bug 2115426] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-setup as new packge for Focal

2025-07-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cnihelton/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+git/wsl-setup/+merge/487874 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115426 Title: [SRU] Backport

[Bug 2115536] Re: [SRU] Allow building WSL images of Focal in the new format

2025-07-01 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cnihelton/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+git/ubuntu-meta/+merge/488025 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cnihelton/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/488026 -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2115536] Re: [SRU] Allow building WSL images of Focal in the new format

2025-06-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [ Impact ]  * Previously, WSL instances relied on a very lightweight build pipeline which was using the CPC image. In 22.04 we did a first step to have WSL has its own project in livecd-rootfs, with its own seed and image to produce a rootfs, while leaving Focal

[Bug 2115536] Re: [SRU] Allow building WSL images of Focal in the new format

2025-06-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: [ Impact ] - - * Previously, WSL instances relied on a very lightweight build pipeline which was using the CPC image. + +  * Previously, WSL instances relied on a very lightweight buil

[Bug 2115536] [NEW] [SRU] Allow building WSL images of Focal in the new format

2025-06-27 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] * Previously, WSL instances relied on a very lightweight build pipeline which was using the CPC image. In 22.04 we did a first step to have WSL has its own project in livecd-rootfs, with its own seed and image to produce a rootfs, while leaving Focal for later.

[Bug 2115426] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-setup as new packge for Focal

2025-06-26 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Proof of builds (with a very minor difference in the version number, added a ppa suffix): AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+archive/ubuntu/pplayground/+build/30961498 ARM64: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+archive/ubuntu/pplayground/+build/30961499 -- You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 2115426] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-setup as new packge for Focal

2025-06-26 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: Despite being out of standard support, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Focal Fossa remains an important release under WSL. Data insights show that around 10% of the Monthly Active User base of Ubuntu releases on WSL remain on 20.04. The `wsl-setup` package is critical for building

[Bug 2115426] [NEW] [SRU] Backport wsl-setup as new packge for Focal

2025-06-26 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: Despite being out of standard support, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Focal Fossa remains an important release under WSL. Data insights show that around 10% of the Monthly Active User base of Ubuntu releases on WSL remain on 20.04. The `wsl-setup` package is critical for building usable WSL

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-06-26 Thread Carlos Nihelton
I used the wsl-setup package from jammy-proposed (version 0.5.8~22.04.1) to test the behaviour of an existing WSL instance and confirmed no regressions. I also unpacked a rootfs, upgraded wsl-setup and repacked manually to perform the same tests that were previously done with images built from t

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-06-26 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch removed: "debdiff for plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5886249/+files/plucky.debdiff ** Patch added: "debdiff for plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5886253/+files/plu

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-06-26 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Thanks for the review @schopin! Here's the corrected debdiff: ** Patch added: "debdiff for plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5886249/+files/plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-06-24 Thread Carlos Nihelton
--register-if-needed to landscape-config. ++ - Upgrades various golang dependencies. + + -- Carlos Nihelton Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:50:32 -0300 + ``` Regarding Oracular and Plucky I'd happily skip them, but I suspect the SRU team will ask what would happen to a user that runs `do-release- up

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-06-24 Thread Carlos Nihelton
My comment arrived late. I was referring to livecd-rootfs, from the SRU bot comment #46: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd- rootfs/+bug/2091293/comments/46 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-06-24 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Following the same reasoning as for Noble, I'm updating just the changelog for Oracular and will do the same for Plucky as well. ** Patch added: "debdiff for oracular" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5885824/+files/oracular.debdiff -- You re

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-06-24 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Those "regressions" seem unrelated to the changeset herein proposed IIUC: AMD64: 84s * Downloading http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu.jammy/STRUCTURE 84s ! Could not open (any of): 84s ! http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu.jammy/STRUCTURE 84s aut

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-06-24 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5885825/+files/plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-06-20 Thread Carlos Nihelton
There was a funky character stream in the changelog due a fancy apostrophe that got messed during the Jammy debdiff generation, I don`t know how... `1. Copy the font to userM-CM-"M-bM-^BM-,M-bM-^DM-"s directory.$` ... ** Patch added: "wsl-setup debdiff for jammy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 2098698] Re: libgtk-4-1: Missing dependency libgles2 on Noble

2025-06-17 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Updated the bug description and title to turn this into a SRU bug. ** Description changed: - While doing the WSL Import and run test for 24.04.2, gtk4-demo failed to - launch due to missing the library for libGLESv2. + [ Impact ] + + * libgtk-4-1 has an implicit dependency on libgles2. GTK4 apps

[Bug 2109978] Re: [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Also affects: gtk4 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109978 Title: [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble To manage notific

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The previous debdiff of livecd-rootfs for jammy contained a bunch of spurious whitespace changes in the debian/changelog file. This one eliminates those spurious changes. Otherwise, the source contents remain the same. Proof of build can be found at: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+ar

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Also affects: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Questing) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble + [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Questing, Plucky, Oracular and Noble -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The previous debdiff contained undesired changes past the changelog. This one is correctly bound to only add the relevant changelog entries without rewriting the package history. Otherwise, the source contents remain the same. Proof of build can be found at: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~cnihe

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch removed: "wsl-setup debdiff for jammy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2091293/+attachment/5875016/+files/jammy-wsl-setup.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-05-08 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch removed: "livecd-rootfs debdiff from jammy-updates" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/2091293/+attachment/5874911/+files/jammy-livecd-rootfs.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-05-07 Thread Carlos Nihelton
We need to update questing first, thus here's the appropriate debdiff. ** Patch added: "debdiff for questing" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5876408/+files/questing.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 2109978] Re: [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble

2025-05-07 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: [ Impact ] 4.14.5 is a new bugfix release from upstream: - https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/blob/4.18.5/NEWS?ref_type=tags + https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/blob/4.14.5/NEWS?ref_type=tags - * Bugs fixed: - - #5844 `gdk_surface_get_device_position: asser

[Bug 2109978] [NEW] [SRU] Update gtk4 to 4.14.5 for Noble

2025-05-05 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] 4.14.5 is a new bugfix release from upstream: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/blob/4.18.5/NEWS?ref_type=tags * Bugs fixed: - #5844 `gdk_surface_get_device_position: assertion 'GDK_IS_SURFACE (surface)' failed` on popover close (Alessandro Astone) - #7

[Bug 2109853] Re: [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: - [WIP] + [Impact] + + With the increasing adoption of tools like authd, it's very likely that + Linux desktop users in corporate environments end up with their + usernames like 'u...@org.com', what doesn't play nice with + sbuild/schroot. Without properly escaping the use

[Bug 2109853] Re: [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Here's the debdiff for oracular ** Patch added: "oracular.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild/+bug/2109853/+attachment/5875432/+files/oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 2109853] Re: [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Here's the debdiff for noble. ** Patch added: "noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild/+bug/2109853/+attachment/5875433/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 2109853] Re: [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Here's the debdiff for plucky ** Patch added: "plucky.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild/+bug/2109853/+attachment/5875431/+files/plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 2109853] [NEW] [SRU] Make sbuild usable for 'u...@org.com' users

2025-05-02 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: [WIP] Fore more information about the issue, please check the upstream bug: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sbuild/-/issues/4 Skipping questing because it will receive the fix via debian-merges. ** Affects: sbuild (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-04-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The AMD64 build above behaved as expected in my tests. Other community members are invited to test them if they have some time to spare. ** Description changed: [Context] Microsoft recently announced a new format for WSL distributions that no longer depends on Windows application packages

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-04-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Images for AMD64 and ARM64 architectures are available at the following Launchpad build links: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wsl-dev/+livefs/ubuntu/jammy/wsl/+build/781418 - ARM64: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wsl-dev/+livefs/ubuntu/jammy/wsl/+build/781419 Those images were built from

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-04-30 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Attached is the debdiff proposed for wsl-setup on 22.04 to make it possible to build images of that LTS in the new WSL tar-only image format. The following links point to proof of builds from a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wsl- dev/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/30662779 and https://launchpad.ne

[Bug 2091293] Re: [SRU] Move WSL to new Microsoft WSL package format

2025-04-29 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Attaching now my proposed debdiff for livecd-rootfs targetting 22.04, based on the current version available in jammy-updates. Here's a link to a PPA as a proof of build: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+archive/ubuntu/pplayground/+build/30661786 With that we aim to provide supported images from

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-04-14 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Proof of builds with the already attached debdiffs can be found on the following PPA links. Their version numbers are suffixed with the "~ppaN" to ensure version released in the archive will override the PPA version afterwards. Plucky: - AMD64: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+archive/ubuntu

[Bug 2107145] [NEW] [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: As part of our offerings to bring Ubuntu Pro to wider audiences we need to backport this service to Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, so users can benefit of the upcoming GA of Ubuntu Pro for WSL, as Windows system that allows more easily secure and manage WSL instances, by automatically pro-

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Proof of build can be seen in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cnihelton/+archive/ubuntu/pplayground/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=jammy The version numbers are slightly changed because I wanted to make sure the archive will contain a higher version

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.changes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871127/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.buildinfo" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871126/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1_source.buildinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.tar.xz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871125/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 2107145] Re: [SRU] Backport wsl-pro-service to Jammy

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Attachment added: "wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.dsc" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2107145/+attachment/5871124/+files/wsl-pro-service_0.1.18~22.04.1.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
tem journal. + * Removes workaround for livepatch no longer needed since pro-client v35 + - systemd service is more confined again. + * Prevents unnecessary re-registration with Landscape + - by passing the CLI flag --register-if-needed to landscape-config. + * Upgrades va

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble

2025-04-11 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Summary changed: - [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373 + [SRU] wsl-pro-service version 0.1.18 for Plucky, Oracular and Noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5870932/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for oracular" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5870931/+files/oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Patch added: "debdiff for plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2106757/+attachment/5870908/+files/plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2106757] Re: [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
** Description changed: - WIP + [ Impact ] + + * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and justification +for backporting the fix to the stable release. + + * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an +explanation of how the upload fixes this bug. + + [ T

[Bug 2106757] [NEW] [SRU] Fix too much logging and fix vulnerabilities GO-2025-3563, GO-2025-3447 and GO-2025-3373

2025-04-10 Thread Carlos Nihelton
Public bug reported: WIP ** Affects: wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106757 Title: [SRU] Fix too much loggin

[Bug 2100586] Re: package javascript-common 11+nmu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed javascript-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2025-03-29 Thread Carlos Eduardo Dutra Brum
Skia, Thanks for your support. I've issued that command you recommended, got some more errors googled a bit and got the solution (chatgpt). You were right. I've tried to upgrade my hole system some days before. You support was fundamental to get me to the solution. Thanks a lot. -- You received

[Bug 2100586] Re: package javascript-common 11+nmu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed javascript-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2025-03-29 Thread Carlos Eduardo Dutra Brum
This was what I'd got from GPT GPT's Message The message indicates that your system needs to be fully updated before you can upgrade to a new Ubuntu release. Follow these steps to resolve the issue: ### Step 1: Update Your Current System Run the following commands: ```bash sudo apt update

[Bug 1987970] Re: after installing wsl-setup WSLG GUI apps stopped working

2025-03-27 Thread Carlos Nihelton
The current way of updating WSL is via its own command line: wsl --update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987970 Title: after installing wsl-setup WSLG GUI apps stopped working To m

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >