[Bug 1913062] Re: netplan apply backtrace

2021-03-17 Thread Bill Nickless
@slyon looks like you released https://github.com/canonical/netplan/releases/tag/0.102 with the fix two days ago; how long does it usually take to filter upstream releases out to focal-updates and groovy-updates? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1914945] [NEW] iftop ignores passively sniffed IPv6 traffic

2021-02-07 Thread Bill Nickless
Public bug reported: IPv4 traffic is displayed but IPv6 is not, when running iftop against a passive promiscuous network interface. ** Affects: iftop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "0001-Support-passively-sniffing-IPv6.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 697803] Re: xfsdumpBULKSTAT failed on 2.6.32-27-server

2011-05-06 Thread Bill Nickless
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 692848 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Good news -- per bug #692848, it's fixed in -31. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697803 Title:

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-03-21 Thread Bill Nickless
I've verified that the proposed "Linux nitwo-ubuntu 2.6.32-31-generic #60-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 17 22:15:39 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux" fixes the problem. I also confirmed that the warnings noted in #30 appear to be harmless; I see them too but the resulting dump includes the files and the restored fi

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-03-02 Thread Bill Nickless
Regression problem is still present in Lucid 2.6.32-29: d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:~$ gunzip < ~/Desktop/100mb.xfs.gz > /tmp/100mb.xfs d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:~$ sudo mkdir -p /mnt/100mb d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:~$ sudo mount -o loop /tmp/100mb.xfs /mnt/100mb d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:~$ sudo xfsdump /mnt/100mb -f /dev

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-02-22 Thread Bill Nickless
I found that gzip'ing the image makes it small enough to attach to this bug. So to replicate the problem under -28, download the attached file and do the following: d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:/tmp$ gunzip < ~/Desktop/100mb.xfs.gz > /tmp/100mb.xfs d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:/tmp$ sudo mkdir -p /mnt/100mb d3m40

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-02-22 Thread Bill Nickless
I have a 100mb xfs filesystem that causes xfsdump to fail every time. I created it by copying /usr/include to a newly created xfs filesystem within a file in /tmp/, deleting a few files, and then restoring them from /usr/include again. Should I attach it to this bug, or would you like me to put i

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-02-22 Thread Bill Nickless
For what it's worth, I use xfs for the root and /home filesystem on my Dell M6500. /home is also encrypted with ECRYPTFS. Since -26, xfsdump always fails immediately on both filesystems. I've been rebooting back to -26 to perform my weekly backups to offline media. -- You received this bug not

[Bug 697803] Re: xfsdumpBULKSTAT failed on 2.6.32-27-server

2011-01-26 Thread Bill Nickless
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 692848 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 692848 Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 * You can subscribe to bug 692848 by following this link: https://bugs.l

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-01-26 Thread Bill Nickless
Problem still exists under 2.6.32-28 on x86_64: + sudo xfsdump -p 10 -L NITWO Ubuntu Home Filesystem -M Written 2011-01-26 -f /media/tvms/Backups/nitwo-ubuntu/home/2011-01-26.xfsdump /home xfsdump: using file dump (drive_simple) strategy xfsdump: version 3.0.4 (dump format 3.0) - Running single-

[Bug 586553] [NEW] casper misinterprets ipv6.disable=1 on kernel command line

2010-05-27 Thread Bill Nickless
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: casper In Lucid (casper 1.236), the script /usr/share/initramfs- tools/scripts/casper has a function parse_cmdline. It iterates over the words in /proc/cmdline looking for boot options. Inside that loop is a case statement. Starting in line 43 we see: