[Bug 1851851] Re: Add option to explicitly accept repository changes

2019-11-08 Thread AtesComp
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #944375 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944375 ** Also affects: synaptic (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944375 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 1851851] [NEW] Add option to explicitly accept repository changes

2019-11-08 Thread AtesComp
Public bug reported: Occasionally, repository owners change related information, keys, etc. This generally causes apt to issue an error to the user, such as: ... Reading package lists... Done E: Repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net///ubuntu disco InRelease' changed its 'Lab

[Bug 1848892] Re: "error: Unknown TPM error." after upgrading to grub 2.04

2019-10-27 Thread AtesComp
To make it permanent, see #10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848892 Title: "error: Unknown TPM error." after upgrading to grub 2.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: ht

[Bug 1848892] Re: "error: Unknown TPM error." after upgrading to grub 2.04

2019-10-27 Thread AtesComp
Specifically: sudo grub-install --no-uefi-secure-boot /dev/sd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848892 Title: "error: Unknown TPM error." after upgrading to grub 2.04 To manage notifi

[Bug 1848892] Re: "error: Unknown TPM error." after upgrading to grub 2.04

2019-10-23 Thread AtesComp
On a 19.04 system, I don't see the /boot/grub/x86_64-efi/tmp.mod file-- so added during the upgrade. Speculation: So, the problem might be related to signed versus unsigned kernels. The earlier kernel was probably signed. The new kernels from the upgrade are probably not s

[Bug 1848892] Re: "error: Unknown TPM error." after upgrading to grub 2.04

2019-10-23 Thread AtesComp
I also blah, blah, blah, upgraded Kubuntu to 19.10 and updated to 5.3.0-19-generic. System: ASUS GL553VE Laptop GPT Disk with EFI partition No TPM module installed that I can determine BIOS: Latest == 308 No TPM settings Turned off Secure Boot and CSM GRUB Boot Error:

[Bug 1769404] Re: grub is installed to /dev/sda by default and fails

2019-03-22 Thread AtesComp
FYI: The dpkg configuration setting for all packages are in: > /var/cache/debconf/config.dat My setting for the GRUB devices were stored around: > Name: grub-pc/install_devices -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1769404] Re: grub is installed to /dev/sda by default and fails

2019-03-22 Thread AtesComp
Found the issue. Do the following: > sudo debconf-show grub-pc > sudo dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc The last screen sets the default GRUB device(s). See: https://askubuntu.com/questions/135741/how-should-one-set-the-grub- pc-packages-install-devices-debconf-setting ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1769404] Re: grub is installed to /dev/sda by default and fails

2019-03-22 Thread AtesComp
So, the undocumented "GRUB_DEVICE" may be the answer. I could only find it in a Gentoo post: GRUB_DEVICE (detected) Device node for the volume containing the root filesystem. Set this to override the grub2-mkconfig command's root device auto-detection. For example, GRUB_DEVICE=/dev/ram0 will forc

[Bug 1769404] Re: grub is installed to /dev/sda by default and fails

2019-03-22 Thread AtesComp
Ok, UUID is only for partitions, so maybe the serial number instead. This error crops up when a new kernel is installed during an update/upgrade. The update-grub command is called which in turn may call grub-install. It seems to always default to /dev/sda instead of the where the sdX grub-instal

[Bug 1769404] Re: grub is installed to /dev/sda by default and fails

2019-03-22 Thread AtesComp
Bin Li is incorrect. The boot order may not determine the allocation of /dev/sdX for any number of hard drives. In general, IDE drives will always be assigned first and SATA drives will be assigned second. If you are booting from a SATA drive and have 2 IDE drives, you will always get /dev/sda to

[Bug 1621629] Re: package-data-downloader fails to process download requests

2016-09-08 Thread AtesComp
** Patch added: "Solution as per initial comment" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1621629/+attachment/4737125/+files/package-data-downloader.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1621629] Re: package-data-downloader fails to process download requests

2016-09-08 Thread AtesComp
** Description changed: A persistent bug exists in the update notifier that affects the ttf-mscorefonts-installer and may also affect other packages. On boot, a user is presented with an update notification indicating that the ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed to install and needs installatio

[Bug 1621629] Re: package-data-downloader fails to process download requests

2016-09-08 Thread AtesComp
** Description changed: A persistent bug exists in the update notifier that affects the ttf-mscorefonts-installer and may also affect other packages. On boot, a user is presented with an update notification indicating that the ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed to install and needs installatio

[Bug 1621629] Re: package-data-downloader fails to process download requests

2016-09-08 Thread AtesComp
** Description changed: A persistent bug exists in the update notifier that affects the ttf-mscorefonts-installer and may also affect other packages. On boot, a user is presented with an update notification indicating that the ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed to install and needs installatio

[Bug 1621629] [NEW] package-data-downloader fails to process download requests

2016-09-08 Thread AtesComp
Public bug reported: A persistent bug exists in the update notifier that affects the ttf-mscorefonts-installer and may also affect other packages. On boot, a user is presented with an update notification indicating that the ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed to install and needs installation: --

[Bug 1242854] Re: udisks2 prevents external hard drive from working

2014-01-29 Thread AtesComp
See the solution for bug #1240336 It's probably related since the user upgraded to Saucy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242854 Title: udisks2 prevents external hard drive from worki

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation / Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid

2014-01-29 Thread AtesComp
Further testing indicates that the above (#50) solution can be removed once you have a working system. Steps: 1. Added session required pam_loginuid.so session required pam_systemd.so to top of /etc/pam.d/ 2. Logout, Restart X, Login 3. Check that you can do it all. 4. Remove

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation / Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid

2014-01-29 Thread AtesComp
Cleaned up /etc/pam.d and used "sudo pam-auth-update" and "sudo pam- auth-update --force" to autofix thing. I found I had an extra likewise PAM profile in /usr/share/pam-configs/. Nothing worked. Finally, I retried a previous solution: Tried version of #32 * Added session required pam_login

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation / Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid

2014-01-27 Thread AtesComp
OK, it is this issue. PolicyKit is choking udisk2. Here are the sample commands: $ udisksctl mount -b /dev/sdm1 --no-user-interaction Error mounting /dev/sdm1: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Error.NotAuthorizedCanObtain: Not authorized to perform operation $ udisksctl mount -b /dev/sdm1

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation / Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid

2014-01-27 Thread AtesComp
My problem has something to do with KDE, udisk, and multiple authentication identities. Disregard my prior comments. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240336 Title: Not authorized to p

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation / Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid

2014-01-27 Thread AtesComp
Checked the login screen shutdown problem using KDM: this works. Reviewing the PAM files shows that the kdm file calls the common-session file. Tried version of #32 * modified to session required pam_systemd.so in /etc/pam.d/common-session * reboot => did not work Tried version of #32 * mo

[Bug 1240336] Re: Not authorized to perform operation / Unable to determine the session we are in: No session for pid

2014-01-27 Thread AtesComp
I'm using Kubuntu and KDM. Updated to 13.10 (64bit, Kubuntu) and encountered the same problem. Cannot mount USB devices. Cannnot change settings in System Settings->Login Screen (apply and leave screen asks to apply again resulting in "Unable to authenticate/execute the action: (code 4)". Tried

[Bug 746082] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139

2011-04-30 Thread AtesComp
I experienced the same problem. Apparently, the google-talkplugin (64 bit) cause interference. Uninstalling google-talkplugin fixed the problem. (Re)Installing nspluginwrapper (and flash, acroread) work thereafter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 772742] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139

2011-04-30 Thread AtesComp
I experienced the same problem. Apparently, the google-talkplugin (64 bit) cause interference. Uninstalling google-talkplugin fixed the problem. (Re)Installing nspluginwrapper (and flash, acroread) work thereafter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 773285] Re: nspluginwrapper installation fails during upgrade to Natty

2011-04-30 Thread AtesComp
Same here. Solution worked. Posted on other similar bugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773285 Title: nspluginwrapper installation fails during upgrade to Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mai

[Bug 773605] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139

2011-04-30 Thread AtesComp
I experienced the same problem. Apparently, the google-talkplugin (64 bit) cause interference. Uninstalling google-talkplugin fixed the problem. (Re)Installing nspluginwrapper (and flash, acroread) work thereafter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 773856] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139

2011-04-30 Thread AtesComp
I experienced the same problem. Apparently, the google-talkplugin (64 bit) cause interference. Uninstalling google-talkplugin fixed the problem. (Re)Installing nspluginwrapper (and flash, acroread) work thereafter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 773758] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139

2011-04-30 Thread AtesComp
I experienced the same problem. Apparently, the google-talkplugin (64 bit) cause interference. Uninstalling google-talkplugin fixed the problem. (Re)Installing nspluginwrapper (and flash, acroread) work thereafter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 773899] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139

2011-04-30 Thread AtesComp
I experienced the same problem. Apparently, the google-talkplugin (64 bit) cause interference. Uninstalling google-talkplugin fixed the problem. (Re)Installing nspluginwrapper (and flash, acroread) work thereafter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 217798] Re: tsclient should recognize Xephyr for XDMCP login

2010-12-13 Thread AtesComp
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/tsclient -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217798 Title: tsclient should recognize Xephyr for XDMCP login -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 217798] Re: tsclient should recognize Xephyr for XDMCP login

2010-12-07 Thread AtesComp
Here is an updated patch for Maverick. Apply all patches (tsclient/debian/patches/) in order to the Maverick branch, then this one. ** Patch added: "Xephyr Addition for Maverick" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tsclient/+bug/217798/+attachment/1759138/+files/xephyr_addition.patch -

[Bug 217798] Re: tsclient should recognize Xephyr for XDMCP login

2010-12-06 Thread AtesComp
Here is a patch to use Xephyr. It worked well for me on Ubuntu 9.10. Not much to it. ** Patch added: "Xephyr Addition" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tsclient/+bug/217798/+attachment/1757792/+files/Xephyr.patch ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/maverick/tsclient ** Branch linked: lp:~u