Re: [Bug 352077] Re: multiple instances on one box undesirable

I have no problem with this. On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Dave Pusey wrote: > My suggestion would be to have a command-line switch like --allow- multiple that would bypass the check if used. -- multiple instances on one box undesirable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352077 You received this bu

Re: [Bug 352077] Re: multiple instances on one box undesirable

This is what PiP was invented for. Specifically. Myth even lets you switch back and forth which video/audio is outermost (like most commercial solutions). Perhaps a preference could be added to Myth's config screens to allow multiple frontends for

Re: [Bug 352077] Re: multiple instances on one box undesirable

At the time i submitted the bug report I think I was careful to say I couldn't think of a situation where it would be desirable to have multiple frontends running on one machine. I'm intrigued as to what you're doing with multiple frontends. On Feb 22, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Dave Pusey wrote: > Follow

Re: [Bug 352077] [NEW] multiple instances on one box undesirable

that would be even better. It's in sh, and located at /usr/bin/mythfrontend . We'd be glad to integrate it then. On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 20:23, Andrew Roazen wrote: > Public bug reported: > > MythTV does not restrict the number of instances of mythfrontend which > can run s

[Bug 352077] [NEW] multiple instances on one box undesirable

Public bug reported: MythTV does not restrict the number of instances of mythfrontend which can run simultaneously on the same box. There is no particular reason why one box should run multiple instances simultaneously and this can inadvertently lead to symptoms like the sound disappearing and per

[Bug 298914] Re: package mythtv-backend 0.21.0+fixes18722-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709326/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709335/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibra

[Bug 298914] [NEW] package mythtv-backend 0.21.0+fixes18722-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mythtv Something about mythtv-backend refuses to delete itself during every upgrade from one version of Ubuntu to another. It's annoying as hell and I end up having to comment out everything in mythtv-backend.prerm and run Synaptic again. If there's some

[Bug 298910] Re: package kdelibs-data 4:3.5.10-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709223/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709224/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz"

[Bug 298910] [NEW] package kdelibs-data 4:3.5.10-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdelibs Using regular GNOME Ubuntu with Mythtv installed. Update was from 8.04 to 8.10, and as usual mythtv-backend refused to delete itself. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Dependencies: hicolor-icon-theme 0.10-1ubuntu1 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.1

[Bug 298911] Re: package update-manager 1:0.93.35 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709257/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709258/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibra

[Bug 298911] [NEW] package update-manager 1:0.93.35 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Attempted to upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10 and when MythTV refused to update mythtv-backend it hung up the install until I opened the console and CTRL-Ced to make it continue with the install. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRele

RE: [Bug 126337] Re: IDE drivers not loaded at boot with powerpc

Seconded. Is this considered unimportant, or is it actually complex? I have an iMac I'd like to gift with Gutsy on it, but it's a no-go until it actually boots. >= Original Message From Bug 126337 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = >Leann: I don't know much about what's lacking, but it looks like a

Re: [Bug 157484] Re: Gutsy powerpc port unbootable

anks for working > out these bugs, and for the PPC install. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ---- | Andrew Roazen, Application Systems Analyst | Cline Library, Northern Arizona University | ☎ 928.523.6764 vCard <http://ww

[Bug 126337] Still not fixed in Gutsy

Doing a system upgrade to Gutsy yesterday returned the system to this problematic state. Since the updater doesn't see any updates between yesterday and today, I doubt the official Oct. 18 Gutsy release today has this fixed. -- IDE drivers not loaded at boot with powerpc https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 126337] Re: IDE drivers not loaded at boot with powerpc

problem confirmed on 1998 iMac Rev.A (EIDE drive), and modprobe ide_core at busybox fixes it first time, then adding ide_core to /usr/share /initramfs-tools/module and running update-initramfs -u fixes it for future reboots. There seems to be a trend in this kernel with ignoring older NewWorld ha

[Bug 67188] Re: "Error activating XKB configuration." - Requires manual xorg.conf editing

Same problem reported with Rev. A 1998 iMac in Gutsy (these problems did not occur in Feisty): _XKB_RULES_NAMES_BACKUP(STRING) = "xorg", "pc105", "us", "mac", "" _XKB_RULES_NAMES(STRING) = "xorg", "pc105", "us", "mac", "" layouts = [] model = macintosh overrideSettings = true options = [] Se

Re: [Bug 107296] description inaccurately describes RAR support

Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2007, Andrew Roazen wrote: > >> Is the default /usr/lib/p7zip/Formats/Rar.so compliant with RAR 2.9 >> > > Nope. Rar.so is for Rar 2 and inferior. For Rar 3 and superior, indeed, > you'll need Rar 2.9. &g

Re: [Bug 107296] description inaccurately describes RAR support

progressively including more and more non-free content in its distribution. -- -------- | Andrew Roazen, Application Systems Analyst | Cline Library, Northern Arizona University | ☎ 928.523.6764 vCard <http://www2.nau.edu/%7Ear24/aroa

[Bug 107296] Re: description inaccurately describes RAR support

I also would like to mention that the RAR plugin is currently only available as a binary, and only for one architecture (i386) which may explain why it is missing from the Ubuntu repository. -- description inaccurately describes RAR support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107296 You received this

[Bug 107296] description inaccurately describes RAR support

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: p7zip-full The p7zip-full package does *not* have RAR unpacking support. Command- line use of this utility to examine or unpack RAR content will report "unsupported archive". This is unusual because the Windows version of 7zip 4.42 does come with RAR unpa