[Bug 1967479] Re: snaps lost connections during 22.04 upgrade

2022-04-05 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
Here's my log since 2022-03-31 ** Attachment added: "snapd.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1967479/+attachment/5577352/+files/snapd.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1967479] [NEW] snaps lost connections during 22.04 upgrade

2022-04-01 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
Public bug reported: Upgrading to yesterdays state of 22.04 (from 20.04) led to problems during upgrade, and lost all snap connections. (To be fair, the release upgrade itself had issues already, that might need an additional bug report, but at least no custom PPAs and just relying on Snaps for w

[Bug 1620635] Re: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional

2019-10-20 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
Seems as if label lookup is done using dbus: https://github.com/ubports /content-hub/blob/xenial/src/com/ubuntu/content/utils.cpp#L254 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620635 Title: li

[Bug 1620635] Re: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional

2019-10-20 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
AppArmor userspace in use: AppArmor parser version 2.10.95 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620635 Title: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules con

[Bug 1620635] Re: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional

2019-10-20 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
Nothing special from what I could gather, just: -) Calling an internal utility function for getting the allow status: https://github.com/ubports/content-hub/blob/xenial/src/com/ubuntu/content/detail/transfer.cpp#L187 -) Which eventually lands here: https://github.com/ubports/content-hub/blob/xenia

[Bug 1620635] Re: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional

2019-10-20 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
We're hitting this bug in UBports Ubuntu Touch on the Sony Xperia X (4.4 kernel, xenial AppArmor) as in #6 and #12, apps using content-hub to request files from a confined application fail receiving the file due to aa_query_label returning a denial before trying transfering a file. -- You receive

[Bug 1838419] Re: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144

2019-09-04 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
This seems to be the commit the backported fixes are based on: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=261588 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838419 Title: ICE in emit_

[Bug 1838419] Re: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144

2019-08-15 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
A similar ICE (as in "in the same function in the same file") in the Debian gcc-6 (6.4.0) package has been fixed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901290 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #901290 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901290 -- You received th

[Bug 1838419] Re: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144

2019-07-30 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
** Description changed: When building the Skia parts of QtWebEngine/Chromium GCC runs into an assert and fails building. - The build host is running Ubuntu 16.04 aarch64 trying to generate armhf binaries. + The build host is running Ubuntu 16.04 with GCC 5.4.0 on aarch64 trying to generate ar

[Bug 1838419] [NEW] ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144

2019-07-30 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
Public bug reported: When building the Skia parts of QtWebEngine/Chromium GCC runs into an assert and fails building. The build host is running Ubuntu 16.04 aarch64 trying to generate armhf binaries. Full build log incl. preprocessed C file is attached. ** Affects: gcc-5 (Ubuntu) Importan

[Bug 1788927] [NEW] Removing repo key doesn't work

2018-08-24 Thread Alfred E. Neumayer
Public bug reported: Removing an apt key from within the software-properties GUI doesn't work, neither before (when the permission is not granted to the process and cached already) nor after entering the user password in the polkit prompt. Existance and enabled state of the repository related to