I can confirm for Ubuntu 19.10 doing
`gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface scaling-factor 1`
has resolved my issue with Terminal windows on my Dell XPS13 set to
1920x1080 when the native LCD is capable of 3200x1800. I now have 100%
scaling in the Display control panel thingie and my Terminal
I have Bionic with friendly-recovery 0.2.38ubuntu1 and the problem still
occurs. I apparently had three filesystems that were in "timeout". I
went to recovery to see what was causing this and got ~120 seconds
before the session was destroyed and the recovery options menu was
redisplayed. I couldn't
I was able to conquer this problem by copying the
/etc/mysql/debian.cnf-5.7 to /etc/mysql/debian.cnf and running sudo apt
install -f one more time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567612
I just booted today's Yakitty build on my machine and it still does it.
I had to rmmod psmouse && modprobe psmouse so I could get the browser to
work to post this.
[ 80.835756] psmouse serio1: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at
byte 4
[ 80.836859] psmouse serio1: TouchPad at isa0
I can use one machine to start an X11 forwarded client on another. I did
this to start gnome-terminal on a Ubuntu Server 16.04 from a Kubuntu
16.04 desktop by using
ssh -Y -f 192.168.0.89 gnome-terminal
This works. Then I look at that gnome-terminal's environment and DISPLAY
and SSH_CLIENT vari
I just re-read the originator report for this bug. My problem is not
exactly the same as his in that I DO get a X11 forwarded client to work
but I cannot connect any more of them except through additional X11
forwarded ssh commands from the original client. Should I report this as
a separate bug? I
Public bug reported:
I have a Linus tree kernel v3.19.2 built using Ubuntu config + defaults
for new options.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: virtualbox-dkms 4.3.10-dfsg-1ubuntu4
Uname: Linux 3.19.2 x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.10
Architecture: amd64
DKMSKernelV
I had this problem as well, and my situation was a little more
complicated to use the workaround.
My subvolume that was being snapshotted for 'btrfs send' to use was at
the top of the hierarchy - there WAS no parent. But BTRFS always has a
parent, so there is still a workaround.
My situation:
ro
OK the diff was useless, and I'm sorry. But I'm not a python weenie, nor
do I do diffs everyday for bug reports. The code, which is trivial to
someone who writes python all the time, is easy in any case. Thank you
for playing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Oh and the proposed code has a bug too - don't look at columns[2]
without checking for len(columns) == 5. Sheesh.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367455
Title:
MAC address for node's
Public bug reported:
The comparison used in provisioningserver/utils/__init__.py:
find_ip_via_arp(mac) compares MAC addresses to the output of an "arp -n"
command using case sensitive comparison. This MAC address may be entered
by a user in a web UI and often is NOT cut/pasted from ARP but rather
I think you need to install 'texlive-metapost' and maybe even 'texlive-
full' to get the necessary files. This should be more obvious.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1334143
Title:
So
This is caused by the file /usr/share/doc-base/gcc-4.8-itm having two
complete copies of its normal content. If I delete the file and then
install gcc-4.8-doc, both copies are put into the file and the
installation effectively fails to install properly.
--
You received this bug notification becau
Public bug reported:
Sorry if this is repeat. I have no log saying WHY the bug occurred. But
it is probably included in the secret developer info :)
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: ndiswrapper-dkms
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.28-generic 3.5.5
Uname: Linux 3.5.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007011
Title:
package libjline-java 1.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite '/usr/share/java/jline.jar', which is also in package scala
Public bug reported:
Sorry I know nothing more to say about this.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libjline-java 1.0-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.38-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri May
I have sporadic driver failure with the 3.0.0-12 released kernel. I
upgraded to the 3.0.7-030007-generic driver and found that the failure
still occurs. It's sporadic - within a day. It is barely possible that
the failure is less likely with the newer driver, but I don't think I
have enough data ye
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openocd
Description for this package says "STM32 Primer2" platform is supported.
I don't believe it can be supported.
According to OpenOCD's documentation PDF:
"
2.5 USB RLINK based
Raisonance has an adapter called RLink. It exists in a stripped-down fo
18 matches
Mail list logo