[Bug 569495] Re: no log-in required for multiple users

2010-04-24 Thread Alacrityathome
Thanks so mucha little embarrasing! Is that a new menu itemthe Login Screen? In any case, that fixed the issue. Sorry to bother you busy professional developers! Thanks again. -- no log-in required for multiple users https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569495 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 569495] Re: no log-in required for multiple users

2010-04-24 Thread Alacrityathome
For further claification, I did a full Ubuntu 10.04 RC installation on to an 8GB usb flash (which I have done with a number of previous Ubuntu versions). -- no log-in required for multiple users https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 569495] Re: no log-in required for multiple users

2010-04-24 Thread Alacrityathome
This also shows up in the remastersys process. A remastersys iso from Ubuntu 10.04RC boots up but then results in a log-in requirement which has an authentication failure. I am assuming the two issues are related. -- no log-in required for multiple users https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569495 Y

[Bug 569495] [NEW] no log-in required for multiple users

2010-04-24 Thread Alacrityathome
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox For 10.04RC, added three different users (admin and desktop) with password required for each. Used the System admin "users and groups" function. But, at boot-up, no log-in requirement occurs and o/s boots up automatically. I expected ubuntu to

[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk

2008-09-23 Thread Alacrityathome
I had the duplicate bug 272630 and consider myself lucky. I had the Intel NIC but had used Alpha 5. I only had the dmesg error and not the hardware eeprom failure. I had Alpha 6 ready to test until I found this bug thread. For folks like me, it will be a good decision to blacklist e1000e pendin

[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e kernel places Intel gigE chipsets at risk

2008-09-22 Thread Alacrityathome
Colin, Seems that a warning may be insufficient. I would think most of the folks testing a pre-release may not know they have an e1000e driver or affected NIC. Maybe blacklist e1000e asap and then re-instate e1000e after a fix is found. Perhaps have the "warning" state something about the e1000

[Bug 267952] Re: Ibex alpha 5 renders Pro/1000 ethernet non functional

2008-09-22 Thread Alacrityathome
you may want to try the fix I describe in bug #272630 -- Ibex alpha 5 renders Pro/1000 ethernet non functional https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug

[Bug 272630] Re: eth0 not connected. ubuntu boot gives e1000 eeprom checksum error and an eth0 MAC of 00:00:00:00:00

2008-09-21 Thread Alacrityathome
** Description changed: This bug has re-appeared. Googling shows this error going back to 2.6.17 but having a fix committed in 8.04.1. I am using 8.04.1 with a kernel updated to 2.6.26-5. - Solved by setting via terminal the MAC : sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether - 00:1c:25:1e:0f:e6 or by

[Bug 272630] Re: eth0 not connected. ubuntu boot gives e1000 eeprom checksum error and an eth0 MAC of 00:00:00:00:00

2008-09-21 Thread Alacrityathome
** Description changed: This bug has reappeard. Googling shows this error going back to 2.6.17 but having a fix committed in 8.04.1. I am using 8.04.1 with a kernel updated to 2.6.26-5. Solved by setting via terminal the MAC : sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:1c:25:1e:0f:e6 or by pu

[Bug 60388] Re: e1000 EEPROM Checksum validity check should be disabled

2008-09-20 Thread Alacrityathome
I have this problem with both 2.6.26-5 and with Alpha 5 Ubuntu 8.10 (2.5.27-3). Solving it with a work around at the moment on 2.6.26 by using the terminal command ... sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:1c:25:1e:0f:e6 or by putting the command in the rc.local file. I have not tried a work-around for

[Bug 272630] Re: eth0 not connected. ubuntu boot gives e1000 eeprom checksum error and an eth0 MAC of 00:00:00:00:00

2008-09-20 Thread Alacrityathome
Also fails under Alpha 5 Ubuntu 8.10 with the dmesg error below: e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 0.4.1.7 [2.501559] e1000e: Copyright (c) 1999-2008 Intel Corporation. [2.501591] e1000e :00:19.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 [2.501606] e1000e :00:19.

[Bug 272630] [NEW] eth0 not connected. ubuntu boot gives e1000 eeprom checksum error and an eth0 MAC of 00:00:00:00:00

2008-09-20 Thread Alacrityathome
Public bug reported: This bug has reappeard. Googling shows this error going back to 2.6.17 but having a fix committed in 8.04.1. I am using 8.04.1 with a kernel updated to 2.6.26-5. Solved by setting via terminal the MAC : sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:1c:25:1e:0f:e6 or by putting this comm

RE: [Bug 3731] Re: Xorg resolution falling back to 640x480 and/or 800x600when h/v freqs incorrect

2007-09-28 Thread Alacrityathome
Nice progress, Bryce. Yes, for me on Tribe 5 and on safe video (otherwise, I get a blank screen), I get edidfail for the ddcprobe command.so, I am one of the lucky ones. By the way, is there a new web site for bug 3731? My old bookmarks for bug 3731 have disappeared. Thanks. John Locke -

[Bug 3731] Re: Xorg resolution falling back to 640x480 and/or 800x600 when h/v freqs incorrect

2007-08-29 Thread Alacrityathome
Byce, Not sure if I should post this here or add to the wiki solution but I have attached the boot screen for the MEPIS solution to the Ubuntu #3731 bug. The MEPIS 6.0 Linux distro is actually based on Ubuntu packages but they added this front end capability to resolve the monitor resolution prob

[Bug 3731] Re: Xorg resolution falling back to 640x480 and/or 800x600 when h/v freqs incorrect

2007-08-27 Thread Alacrityathome
Many thanks, Bryce, for investing so much in this solution. I love testing a wide range of Linux live CDs and find that a % recognize my i810 1024/768 laptop monitor and a % do not recognize it. My question is not part of the wiki spec discussion but more general. Can I ask if, in your mind, the

[Bug 3731] Re: Xorg resolution falling back to 640x480 and/or 800x600 when h/v freqs incorrect

2007-08-25 Thread Alacrityathome
Just tested tribe 5 Ubuntu and hoped the new GUI for screen resolution would finally assist in recognizing my 1028 x 768 LCD intel 810/815 screen resolution. Did not work. Only worked at low resolution on the safe video mode start up. Then use the terminal and the sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-