Dear Ubuntu Bug Control admins,
Looks like canonical-ubuntu-qa membership expired on January 9, just
after two months [1] the team was added to ubuntu-bugcontrol:
On 2025-01-09 06:15, Ubuntu Bug Control wrote:
> Hello Canonical's Ubuntu QA,
>
> The membership of Canonical's Ubuntu QA (canonical-
[Re-sending this as the previous one had a typo in Brian's address.]
Dear Ubuntu Bug Control admins,
Looks like canonical-ubuntu-qa membership expired on January 9, just
after two months [1] the team was added to ubuntu-bugcontrol:
On 2025-01-09 06:15, Ubuntu Bug Control wrote:
> Hello Canonical
Thanks for taking the time to look at this. The issue is when doing unembargo
for subprojects/PPAs that are not the ESM ones. The script has this comment
near the beginning of the file:
```
# Copy from archive to a PPA:
# ./unembargo --ppa ubuntu -d kees --pocket release $PKG
```
But this is r
In general this LGTM, but I wonder if there could be scenarios where
opt.destination != UBUNTU_ARCHIVE and we will need the pocket to still be
security... let's ask others about this just in case!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~octagalland/ubuntu-qa-tools/+git/ubuntu-qa-tools/+merge/479086
Your
Good idea. Now I'm setting the default value for pocket _after_ the `--esm`
toggles take effect. Additionally, specifying a pocket when unembargoing an ESM
update is no longer accepted (since the script was overriding it with `release`
anyways).
I tested the following combinations and seemed to
@octagalland Thanks for the comment, I do think your explanation makes
sense...perhaps you could clean up the esm code that overrides the pocket since
it will no longer be necessary with your change?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~octagalland/ubuntu-qa-tools/+git/ubuntu-qa-tools/+merge/479086
Yo
Which PPA are you trying to unembargo to? There's already code to handle
overriding the pocket when unembargoing to an ESM ppa, is that insufficient?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~octagalland/ubuntu-qa-tools/+git/ubuntu-qa-tools/+merge/479086
Your team Ubuntu Bug Control is requested to review t
7 matches
Mail list logo