** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097688
Title:
[BPO] openvpn/2.6.12 from Noble to Jamm
lgtm. thanks!
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097688
Title:
[BPO] openvpn/2.6.12 from N
Sponsored to jammy-backports
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097688
Title:
[BPO] openvpn/2.6.12 from Noble to Jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
> When you generate the new source package to upload, please make sure
not to include changelog info from more than the backport changelog
entry;...
I've been told explicitly to *include* that on SRUs (hence I just
tweaked my sbuild wrapper to generate it automatically), because users
want to know
I'll sponsor this today
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097688
Title:
[BPO] openvpn/2.6.12 from Noble to Jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
New patch based on 2.6.12-0ubuntu0.24.04.3
** Patch added: "lp2097688_v4.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/2097688/+attachment/5875079/+files/lp2097688_v4.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subs
> When you generate the new source package to upload
I just realized you might not have upload rights and maybe @waveform
sponsored it? In that case the last point in my comment would be
directed to @waveform, or whoever is doing the building and uploading.
--
You received this bug notification
Thanks for testing with network-manager! I feel better about not
including the Breaks:, as I think many people do use network-manager-
openvpn (I do on my laptops).
> New patch removing the breaks rule for network-manager-openvpn
A few minor requests:
1. It looks like the security team has updat
New patch removing the breaks rule for network-manager-openvpn
** Patch added: "lp2097688_v3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/2097688/+attachment/5873329/+files/lp2097688_v3.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backpo
So, I tested the backported code with network-manager and it worked for
the canonical vpn at least. I marked as broken just to be extra cautious
but it clearly is not completely broken. I'd be happy to upload a new
debdiff removing that breaks rule.
--
You received this bug notification because y
>netowrk added Breaks rule for network-manager-openvpn as the package
has patches for openvpn 2.6 in noble.
Since jammy's network-manager-openvpn version is 1.8, and there is no
backport of network-manager-openvpn in jammy, this appears to completely
prevent the use of network-manager-openvpn with
Yes, I *think* I got it in the right pocket the second time round:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=openvpn
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Hi folks,
I'd like to get an update on the status of this backport. Has it been
re-uploaded to the correct pocket?
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097688
Title:
Argh, I did indeed use -d with sbuild (because it's what I always use --
there was some issue with -c I needed to work around historically that I
can't recall -- probably cross-building related). Anyway, I'll prep
another upload this evening.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
nope, sbuild -d is a clear override of what's in the changelog:
"Explicitly set the distribution for the package build. This will be
selecting the correct chroot to use and also sets the value of the
Distribution field in the created .changes file"
Indeed I checked the .changes file that was in th
@mapreri: target Distribution is based on changelog entry I believe when
uploaded, even with `-d DIST` in `sbuild`. So that's something to
always check in changelog that it targets the correct pocket (jammy-
backports instead of jammy).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
It's in the wrong queue, it has "Distribution: jammy" instead of
"Distribution jammy-backports".
Now it will need somebody from the SRU team to reject it, a rebuild and
re-upload.
I'm not sure how that happened, it used to be the case when somebody
used sbuild with `-d DIST` instead of `-c DIST`
Jorge, thanks for providing a test-plan! I see this is already sponsored
and pending review by the backports team in the unapproved queue:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=openvpn
I'm therefore unsubscribing the ~ubuntu-sponsors team. Feel free to re-
subscribe, s
[Test Plan]
The bug can be reproduced by just running:
openvpn --show-ciphers
The non-patched version returns no algorithms and the patched version
should include a list of cipher algorithms like this:
AES-128-CBC (128 bit key, 128 bit block)
AES-128-CFB (128 bit key, 128 bit block, TLS client/s
Based on Vladimir's tests passing, and the major points being addressed,
this seems ready for sponsorship to jammy. I'll upload making the
trivial tweaks to d/changelog that Vladimir pointed out. On the subject
of copying the test-plan it would *appear*, looking at the BPO process
[1] that the temp
Hi Vladimir, thank you for your help.
I think the test plan from LP: #2077769 should cover both cases (FIPS and
non-FIPS). Do you want me to copy it over here?
Regards
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
h
Hi,
Thank you for the patch!
Minor nits:
- trailing whitespaces in changelog after LP: #2091575
- typo in dependencies
I have applied those to the diff and will try to build/test the package
now.
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
New patch version. Added documentation for changes and also added Breaks
rule for network-manager-openvpn as the package has patches for openvpn
2.6 in noble.
** Patch added: "lp2097688_v2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/2097688/+attachment/5860266/+files/lp2097
23 matches
Mail list logo
